Advertisement

Post-18 Educational Choices: ‘Our Students Need to Avoid the easyJet Version of Universities’

  • Kate Hoskins
Chapter
  • 297 Downloads
Part of the Policy and Practice in the Classroom book series (PPC)

Abstract

This chapter explores how the students decide upon their post-18 educational pathways in terms of the resources and support available to them from their teachers and families. I then explore how recent policy changes to higher education tuition fees have influenced the students’ views on attending university and I provide the teachers’ views on university as an option for their students’ participation. Finally, I explore how the students’ gender, social class and ethnicity influence their decisions to attend university and the type of university course and institution they intend to apply for. In examining their plans for their post-18 choices, I highlight any advantages possessed by those young people with more academically ‘successful’ identities in terms of their achievements.

Keywords

College Attendance Higher Education Funding Council Of England (HEFCE) White British Russell Group Institutions Black African Caribbean 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Ainley, P., & Allen, M. (2010) Lost Generation? New strategies for youth and education. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  2. Alcock, R. (2011) ‘Why universities are charging £9,000 fees; Economic theory shows universities are like champagne, not potatoes’. The Guardian 7 April. Online https://www.theguardian.com/education/mortarboard/2011/apr/07/tuition-fees-economic-theory (accessed 9 September 2015).
  3. Archer, L., Mendick, H., & Hollingworth, S. (2010) Urban Youth and Schooling. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Macrae, S. (2000) Choice, Pathways and Transitions Post-16: New Youth, New Economies in the Global City. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  5. Basit, T., & And Modood, T. (2016) Ethnic Capital, Higher Education and Life Chances, in J. Cote & A. Furlong. (eds) Oxford Handbook of Higher Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. BBC Science (2013) ‘The Great British Class Survey – Results’. BBC 3 April. Online www.bbc.co.uk/science/0/21970879 (accessed 17 May 2013).
  7. Bishop, D. (2016) ‘Clarity of purpose in the TEF and the REF’, Times Higher Education. Online: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/clarity-purpose-tef-and-ref (accessed 9 January 2017).
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1993) Sociology in Question. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992) An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bradley, H., & Ingram, N. (2013) Banking on the Future: choices, aspirations and economic hardship in working-class student experience, in W. Atkinson, S. Roberts, & M. Savage. (eds) Class Inequality in Austerity Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Brignall, M., & Timms, A. (2015) ‘EasyJet - the airline that’s difficult to deal with’. The Guardian 5 December. Online: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/dec/05/easyjet-complaints-compensation-claims-denied (accessed 12 December 2015).
  13. Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (2012) Education: In Search of A Future. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Burke, P. J. (2012) The Right to Higher Education: Beyond widening participation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Burke, P. J. (2013) ‘Formations of Masculinity and Higher Education Pedagogies’ in Culture, Society and Masculinities, Vol. 5 (2): 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Callender, C., & Jackson, J. (2008) ‘Does the fear of debt constrain choice of university and subject of study?’ in Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 33 (4): 405–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Codiroli, N. (2015) ‘Inequalities in students’ choice of STEM subjects: An exploration of intersectional relationships’. CLS working paper. London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies.Google Scholar
  18. Cree, V. E. (ed.) (2013) Social Work: A Reader. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Croxford, L., & Raffe, D. (2014) ‘Social class, ethnicity and access to higher education in the four countries of the UK: 1996-2010’ in International Journal of Lifelong Education, Vol. 33 (1): 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crozier, G., & Reay, D. (2011) ‘Capital Accumulation: Working Class Students Learning How to Learn in Higher Education’ in Teaching in Higher Education Journal, Vol. 16 (2): 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. David, M., & Naidoo, R. (eds) (2012) The Sociology of Higher Education: Reproduction, Transformation and Change in a Global Era. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Doward, J., & Ratcliffe, R. (2016) ‘Quarter of UK graduates are low earners 10 years after university’. The Guardian 13 August. Online: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/aug/13/quarter-of-graduates-are-low-earners (accessed 12 September 2016).
  23. European Union Committee (2012) ‘TVET and Skills Development in E. U. Development Cooperation’. European Commission. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/tvet-study-aets-2012-final-report_en.pdf (accessed 5 July 2015).
  24. Evans, J., & Shen, W. (eds) (2010) Youth Employment and the Future of Work. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Francis, B. (2000) Boys, Girls and Achievement: Addressing the classroom issues. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  26. Fuller, A., Heath, S., Dyke, M., Foskett, N., Foskett, R., Johnston, B., Maringe, F., Rice, P., & Taylor, J. (2006) Non-Participation in Higher Education: Decisionmaking as an embedded social practice ESRC TLRP. Online. http://www.tlrp.org/proj/wphe/wp_fuller.html (accessed October 2014).
  27. Gaine, C. (1995) Still No Problem Here. Staffordshire: Trentham Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  28. Galley, D. (2014) ‘Why are there so few male social workers?’ The Guardian 5 July. Online: https://www.theguardian.com/social-carenetwork/2014/jul/25/why-so-few-male-social-workers (accessed 17 March 2015).
  29. General Teaching Council for England (GTCE) (2011) ‘Annual digest of statistics 2010–11 Profiles of registered teachers in England’. GTCE Online: http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/11914/1/annual_digest_psd110811.pdf (accessed 5 April 2016).
  30. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) (2015) ‘£1.6 million HEFCE Catalyst funding for higher apprenticeships in partnership with business’. HEFCE 16 July. Online: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/newsarchive/2015/Name,104718,en.html (accessed 3 March 2016).
  31. Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) (2012) ‘What do graduates do? Career planning for higher education and beyond. HESA. Online: http://www.hecsu.ac.uk/assets/assets/documents/WDGD_Oct_2012.pdf (accessed 1 January 2013).
  32. HM Government (2010) Unleashing Aspiration: The government response to the final report of the panel on fair access to the professions. CM7755. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  33. Hoskins, K. (2012) ‘Widening participation aims and outcomes: examining higher education prospects for four non-traditional students’ in Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, Vol. 14 (3): 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoskins, K., & Ball, S. (2017) Education and Social Class, in A. Van Zanten. (ed.) Dictionnaire de l’éducation. Quadridge/ PUF.Google Scholar
  35. Hoskins, K., & Barker, B. (2014) Education and Social Mobility: Dreams of Success. London/Staffordshire: IOE and Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  36. Independent Commission on Fees (2014) ‘Analysis of trends in higher education applications, admissions, and enrolments’. ICoF Online: http://www.independentcommissionfees.org.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ICoF-Report-Aug-2014.pdf (accessed 5 November 2015).
  37. Medway, P., Rhodes, V., Macrae, S., Maguire, M., & Gewirtz, S. (2003) Widening Participation through Supporting Undergraduates: what is being done and what can be done to support student progression at King’s?. London: King’s College Department of Education and Professional Studies.Google Scholar
  38. O’Neill, M. (2016) Youth Unemployment Statistics. House of Commons Briefing Paper 5871.Google Scholar
  39. Open University (2016) ‘Fees and Funding’. OU Online: http://www.open.ac.uk/postgraduate/fees-and-funding (accessed 27 September 2016).
  40. Policy Forum (2015) ‘Social mobility and education - school choice, character education and the Pupil Premium’, in http://www.westminsterforumprojects.co.uk/forums/event.php?eid=1067 (accessed 5 January, 2016).
  41. Ratcliffe, R. (2012) ‘Why should I study at a Russell Group university?’ The Guardian 19 December. Online: http://www.theguardian.com/education/2012/dec/19/should-i-go-to-a-russell-group-university (accessed 10 January 2016).
  42. Reay, D., David, M., & Ball, S. J. (2005) Degrees of Choice: social class, race and gender in higher education. Staffordshire: Trentham Books Limited.Google Scholar
  43. Shiner, M., & Noden, P. (2014) ‘‘Why are you applying there?’ ‘Race’, class and the construction of higher education ‘choice’ in the United Kingdom’ in British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 36 (8): 1–22.Google Scholar
  44. Skelton, C., & Francis, B. (2009) Feminism and the Schooling Scandal. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Stahl, G. (2015) Identity, neoliberalism and aspiration in white working-class boys: educating white working-class boys. USA: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  46. Swain, H. (2012) ‘Are lessons for lecturers the way ahead?’. The Guardian 20 November. Online: https://www.theguardian.com/higher-educationnetwork/blog/2012/nov/20/lessons-for-lecturers-hea-roundtable (accessed 5 January 2013).
  47. Unterhalter, E., Ladwig, J., & Jeffrey, C. (2014) ‘‘Aspirations, education and social justice: applying Sen and Bourdieu’ in British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 35 (1): 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vignoles, A., Goodman, A., Machin, S., & McNally, S. (2008) Widening Participation in Higher Education: A Quantitative Analysis: Full Research Report ESRC End of Award Report, RES-139-25-0234. Swindon: ESRC.Google Scholar
  49. Vincent, C., & Ball, S. (2007) ‘‘Making up’ the middle-class child: families, activities and class dispositions’ in Sociology, Vol. 41 (6): 1061–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Welham, H. (2014) ‘The glass ceiling in education: why are so few women becoming headteachers?’ The Guardian 12 February. Online: https://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/teacher-blog/2014/feb/12/women-headteachers-education-glass-ceiling-careers (accessed 1 May 2016).
  51. Wilkins, A., & Burke, P. J. (2014) ‘Widening participation in higher education: The role of professional and social class identities and commitments’ in British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 36 (3): 434–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilkins, S., Shams, F., & Huisman, J. (2013) ‘The decision-making and changing behavioural dynamics of potential higher education students: the impacts of increasing tuition fees in England’ in Education Studies, Vol. 39 (2): 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wright, O. (2015) ‘Key Government strategy in decline as apprenticeships fall’. The Independent 1 January. Online: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/key-government-strategy-in-decline-as-apprenticeships-fall-9953533.html (accessed 14 September 2016).

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate Hoskins
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of RoehamptonLondonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations