Skip to main content

Children and Youth Participation in Decision-Making and Research Processes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Capability Approach, Empowerment and Participation

Abstract

In this chapter, Biggeri, Arciprete, and Karkara argue that a capability approach to participation is just as relevant for children and the youth as it is for adults and vulnerable groups. Unlike other approaches, the capability approach puts great emphasis on the instrumental and intrinsic value of participation for well-being. It is also readily adaptable and particularly well placed to analyse the potentialities of children due to its focus on agency and participation. In line with this approach, this chapter tries to show that children can actively contribute to social change if they are given the opportunity for voice and the space to express their concerns. It also shows that neglecting children’s agency does not protect them from the burden of responsibility: it undermines their development, limits their capabilities, and puts them at risk of abuse, exploitation, and hardship. On the other hand, fostering children’s participation is central to the process of ‘evolving capabilities’, promotes gender equality, and has larger societal implications. To help achieve these goals, the authors argue we need to rethink educational systems and require a new expanded focus on functionings for democratic citizenship.

Mario Biggeri and Caterina Arciprete devised the conceptual ideas presented in this chapter and wrote it. Ravi Karkara contributed by writing Sect. 8.3.1 between November 2015 and February 2016.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Noteworthy examples include the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the Bernard Van Leer Foundation, and The Centre for Studies in Childhood and Youth in Sheffield, UK.

  2. 2.

    External capabilities are conferred by direct connection or relationship with another person (Foster & Handy, 2008).

  3. 3.

    The notion of ‘evolving capabilities’ introduced in Ballet et al. (2011) recognizes that the opportunity to exercise self-determination and autonomy evolves continuously and is critical in the process of capability expansion beginning from childhood.

  4. 4.

    A noteworthy example is Philosophy for Children (P4C), an educational movement developed in the 1970s, which aims to develop critical thinking and democratic citizenship in children and youths. This goal can be achieved by cultivating Complex Thinking (Lipman, 2003), which amounts to involving students in philosophizing as a dialogical activity.

  5. 5.

    See UNICEF (2003a) for the report.

  6. 6.

    Rio Declaration is available here: http://www.unicef.org/protection/Rio_Declaration_and_Call_for_Action.pdf

  7. 7.

    For example, responding to a legislative proposal to ban all children under the age of 14 from any kind of work, Juan Evo Morales drew on his conversation with representatives from the Bolivian working children’s movement, to argue that banning child labour can be dangerous (by pushing such activities underground) and can threaten children’s livelihoods.

  8. 8.

    One example of an innovative pedagogical approach is the Reggio Emilia Approach originally adopted in Italy. This education philosophy is influenced by the theories of Loris Malaguzzi and Lev Vygotsky and it is grounded in the idea that children are both the source and constructors of their own experience, and thus active participants in the organization of their identities, abilities, and autonomy. Another example of meaningful children’s involvement in democratic participation can be found in the municipality of Rovigo. Here, a linkage was built between school system and the local government allowing children to learn critical, creative, and caring thinking, and to practice civic participation.

  9. 9.

    See http://www.open.ac.uk/researchprojects/childrens-research-centre/

  10. 10.

    See Alderson and Morrow (2011) for an overview of guidelines for research on children.

References

  • Abebe, T., & Bessell, S. (2014). Advancing Ethical Research with Children: Critical Reflections on Ethical Guidelines. Children’s Geographies, 12(1), 126–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, P. (1995). Listening to Children: Children, Ethics and Social Research. Barkingside, UK: Barnado’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2011). The Ethics of Research with Children and Young People: A Practical Handbook (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S. (2008). Choosing Domains: The Capability Approach and Multidimensional Poverty. In N. Kakwani & J. Silber (Eds.), The Many Domains of Poverty. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballet, J., Biggeri, M., & Comim, F. (2011). Children’s Agency and the Capability Approach: A Conceptual Framework. In M. Biggeri, J. Ballet, & F. Comim (Eds.), Children and the Capability Approach (pp. 22–45). Basingstoke, UK/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ballet, J., Dubois, J. L., & Mahieu, F. R. (2007). Responsibility for Each Other’s Freedom: Agency as the Source of Collective Capability. Journal of Human Development, 8(2), 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baraldi, C. (2008). Bambini e Società [Children and Society]. Roma: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, R., Beresford, P., Boote, J., Cooper, C., & Faulkner, A. (2011). Evaluating the Impact of Public Involvement on Research: A Prospective Case Study. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35, 609–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J., & Weller, S. (2003). “Is It Fun?” Developing Children Centred Research Methods. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23(1/2), 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. (2008). Elé belé: L’India e le illusioni della democrazia globale [Ele bele: India and the Illusions of Global Democracy]. Roma: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellanca, N., Biggeri, M., & Marchetta, F. (2011). An Extension of the Capability Approach: Towards a Theory of Dis-Capability. ALTER – European Journal of Disability Research, 5(3), 158–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., & Anich, R. (2009). The Deprivation of Street Children in Kampala: Can the Capability Approach and Participatory Methods Unlock a New Perspective in Research and Decision Making? Mondes en développement, 37(146), 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., Ballet, J., & Comim, F. (Eds.). (2011). Children and the Capability Approach. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., Bellanca, N., & Trani, J.-F. (Eds.). (2011). Editorial. ALTER – European Journal of Disability Research, 5(3), 139–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., & Karkara, R. (2014). Transforming Children’s Rights into Real Freedom: A Dialogue Between Children’s Rights and the Capability Approach from a Life Cycle Perspective. In D. Stoecklin & J.-M. Bonvin (Eds.), Children’s Rights and the Capability Approach: Challenges and Prospects (pp. 19–42). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., & Libanora, R. (2011). From Evaluating to Valuing: Tools and Procedures to Operationalize the Capability Approach. In M. Biggeri, J. Ballet, & F. Comim (Eds.), Children and the Capability Approach. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., Libanora, R., Mariani, S., & Menchini, L. (2006). Children Conceptualizing Their Capabilities: Results of a Survey Conducted During the First Children’s World Congress on Child Labour’. Journal of Human Development, 7(1), 59–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., & Santi, M. (2012). Missing Dimensions of Children’s Well-Being and Well-Becoming in Education Systems: Capabilities and Philosophy for Children. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13(3), 373–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonvin, J. M., & Galster, D. (2010). Making them Employable or Capable: Social Integration Policy at the Crossroads. In H. U. Otto & H. Ziegler (Eds.), Education, Welfare and the Capabilities Approach (pp. 71–84). Leverkusen, Germany: Barbara Budrich Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boyden, J. (2001). Children’s Participation in the Context of Forced Migration. PLA Notes, 42, 52–56. IIED, London. http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G01968.pdf

  • Boyden, J., & Levison, D. (2000). Children as Economic and Social Actors in the Development Process (EGDI Working Paper No. 1). Stockholm: EGDI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the Family as a Context for Human Development: Research Perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F., González, M., Navarro, D., & Aligué, M. (2013). Children as Advisers of Their Researchers: Assuming a Different Status for Children. Child Indicators Research, 6(2), 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1983). Rural Development. Putting the Last First. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., Kjørholt, A. T., & Moss, P. (Eds.). (2008). Beyond Listening: Children Perspectives on Early Childhood Services. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A. (2002). Visions of Development: A Study of Human Values. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A. (2006). Capability Approach. In D. A. Clark (Ed.), The Elgar Companion to Development Studies (pp. 32–45). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, W. (1985). Friendship and Peer Culture in Early Years. Norwood, CA: NJ Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, W. (2003). We Are Friends, Right? Inside Kid’s Culture. Washington, DC: Henry (Joseph) Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, W. (2005). Collective Action and Agency in Young Children’s Peer Cultures. In J. Qvortrup (Ed.), Studies in Modern Childhood: Society, Agency, Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRC. (1989). Convention on the Rights of Child, United Nations General Assembly A/RES/44/25, 61st Plenary Meeting, 20 November. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/44/a44r025.htm

  • Crivello, G., Camfield, L., & Woodhead, M. (2009). How Can Children Tell Us About Their Wellbeing? Exploring the Potential of Participatory Research Approaches Within Young Lives. Social Indicators Research, 90, 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRPD. (2018). Convention on the Rights of the Person with Disabilities. United Nations (Online). http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convention_accessible_pdf.pdf. Last Accessed 19 Feb 2018.

  • Darbyshire, P., MacDougall, C., & Schiller, W. (2005). Multiple Methods in Qualitative Research with Children: More Insight or Just More? London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Masi, D., & Santi, M. (2012). Poli§ofia: A P4C Curriculum Towards Citizenship Education. In M. Santi & S. Oliverio (Eds.), Educating for Complex Thinking Through Philosophical Inquiry. Models, Advances and Proposals for the New Millennium (pp. 151–167). Napoli, Italy: Liguori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R., & Nussbaum, M. C. (2012). Children’s Rights and a Capabilities Approach: The Question of Special Priority. Cornell Law Review, 97, 549–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doná, G. (2006). Children as Research Advisors: Contributions to a ‘Methodology of Participation’ in Researching Children in Difficult Circumstances. International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care, 2(2), 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeny, T., & Boyden, J. (2004). Acting in Adversity – Rethinking the Causes, Experiences and Effects of Child Poverty in Contemporary Literature (QEH Working Paper, 116). Oxford, UK: Queen Elizabeth House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, C., Karkara, R., & Laws, S. (2004). A Workshop Report on Child Participation in the UN Study on Violence Against Children. London: Save the Children Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. E., & Handy, C. (2008). External Capabilities. In K. Basu & R. Kanbur (Eds.), Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. (1998). The Sociology of Childhood and Children’s Rights. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 6(4), 433–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A., & Fitzgerald, R. (2010). Progressing Children’s Participation: Exploring the Potential of a Dialogical Turn. Childhood, 17(3), 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1981). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C. S. (2014). Agency, Participation and Transitions Beyond Schools. In C. S. Hart, M. Biggeri, & B. Babic (Eds.), Agency and Participation in Childhood and Youth: International Applications of the Capability Approach in Schools and Beyond. London: Bloomsbury.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C. S., Biggeri, M., & Babic, B. (Eds.). (2014). Agency and Participation in Childhood and Youth: International Applications of the Capability Approach in Schools and Beyond. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J. (2008). Displaced Children’s Participation in Political Violence: Towards Greater Understanding of Mobilisation. Conflict, Security and Development, 8(3), 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. A. (1992). Children’s Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship (Innocenti Essays, No. 4, p. 5). Florence, Italy: UNICEF International Child Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, S. (2006). From Individual to Collective Capabilities: The Capability Approach as a Conceptual Framework for Self-Help. Journal of Human Development, 7(3), 398–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, L. G., & Johnson, J. (2005). Interviewing Young Children: Explicating Our Practices and Dilemmas. Qualitative Health Research, 15(6), 821–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Prout, A. (Eds.). (1997). Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood; Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. London/New York/Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karkara, R. (2011). Essential Reader on Strengthening Meaningful and Ethical Participation of Children and Youth – Social Coherence and Human Rights. Istanbul, Turkey: International Training Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellett, M. (2005). Children as Active Researchers: A New Research Paradigm for the 21st Century? Published Online by ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, NCRM/003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleine, D., Pearson, G., & Poveda, S. (2016). Participatory Methods: Engaging Children’s Voices and Experiences in Research. London: Global Kids Online. www.globalkidsonline.net/participatory-research. Last Accessed 7 Dec 2017.

  • Kolucki, B., & Lemish, D. (2011). Communicating with Children: Principles and Practices to Nurture, Inspire, Excite, Educate and Heal. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, G. (2001). Promoting Children’s Participation in Democratic Decision-Making (Innocenti Insight). Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, G. (2005). Can You Hear Me? The Right of Young Children to Participate in Decisions Affecting Them. The Hague, The Netherlands: Bernard van Leer Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, G. (2011). Every Child’s Right to Be Heard: A Resource Guide on the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child General Comment No. 12. London: UNICEF and Save the Children. http://resourcecentre.savethechildren.se/sites/default/files/documents/5259.pdf. Last Accessed 19 Nov 2014

  • Laws, S., & Mann, G. (2004). So You Want to Involve Children in Research? A Toolkit Supporting Children’s Meaningful and Ethical Participation in Research Relating to Violence Against Children. Stockholm: Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieten, K. (2008). Children, Structure and Agency: Realities Across the Developing World. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lücker-Babel, M.-F. (1995). The Right of the Child to Express Views and to Be Heard: An Attempt to Interpret Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 3, 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, G., & Tolfree, D. (2003). Children’s Participation in Research: Reflections from the Care and Protection of Separated Children in Emergencies Project. Stockholm: Save the Children Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapp, S. C. (2010). Global Child Welfare and Well-Being. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, H. (2003). Children and Regeneration: Setting and Agenda for Community Participation and Integration. Children & Society, 17, 264–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, B. (2000). Intergenerational Relations and the Politics of Childhood. Paper Presented to ESRC Young People 5–16 Programme Conference, London 20–21 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moehling, C. (1997). The Impact of Children’s Income on Resource Allocations (Manuscript). Columbus: Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina, G., Molina, F., Tanner, T., & Seballos, F. (2009). Child-Friendly Participatory Research Tools (Participatory Learning and Action 60: Community-Based Adaptation to Climate Change). London: International Institute of the Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, T., Noble-Carr, D., & McArthur, M. (2016). Changing Things for the Better: The Use of Children and Young People’s Reference Groups in Social Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(2), 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard: Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kane, C. (2011). Children’s Agency and Participation – Its Relevance for Development, Peace, and Human Rights: Reflections on Practice from Diverse Contexts. Paper for International Conference on Human Development and Human Rights: Decades of Advancement. What’s Next for Children and Youth? Agency and Participation for Enhancing Equity Organised by UNICEF, UNFPA and UNDP, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic 27–29 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mally, K. (2004). Children and Young People Participating in PRSP. Lessons from Save the Children’s Experiences. London: Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1997). Emancipatory Research: Realistic Goal or Impossible Dream. Doing Disability Research, 2, 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onano, V. (2015). Without Access to Education, It Is Impossible to Make Gender Equality a Reality. UN Women News, 29 May. http://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2015/5/vivian-onano

  • Orkin, K. (2011). “See First, Think Later, Then Test”: How Children’s Perspectives Can Improve Economic Research. European Journal of Development Research, 23, 774–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palaiologou, I. (2014). “Do We Hear What Children Want to Say?” Ethical Praxis When Choosing Research Tools with Children Under Five. Early Child Development and Care, 184(5), 689–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prout, A. (2000). Children’s Participation: Control and Self-Realization in British Late Modernity. Children and Society, 14, 304–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punch, S. (2002). Research with Children: The Same or Different from Research with Adults? Childhood, 9(3), 321–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1997). The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. University of Chicago Law Review, 64, 765–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Save the Children. (2000). Children and Participation: Research, Monitoring and Evaluation with Children and Young People. London: Save the Children UK. http://www.participatorymethods.org/sites/participatorymethods.org/files/children%20and%20participation_wilkinson.pdf. Last Accessed 19 Feb 2018.

  • Save the Children. (2007). Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children in Honduras. Honduras: Save the Children UK. https://archive.crin.org/en/docs/Save_UK_Honduras.pdf

  • Scott, J. (2008). Children as Respondents: The Challenge for Quantitative Methods. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1980). Equality of What. In S. M. McMurrin (Ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Value (pp. 195–220). Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1990). Justice: Means Versus Freedom. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19, 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoecklin, D. (2009). L’enfant acteur et l’approche participative [The Child Actor and the Participative Approach]. In J. Zermatten & D. Stoecklin (Eds.), Le droit des enfants de participer. Norme juridique et réalité pratique: contribution à un nouveau contrat social. [Children’s Rights to Participate. Legal Standard and Practical Reality: A Contribution to a New Social Contract] (pp. 47–71). Sion: IUKB/IDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall, E., & Liebel, M. (2008). Theorising Children’s Participation in ‘Collective’ Decision-Making. Overview Paper for the European Science Foundation Seminar, Children’s Participation in Decision-Making: Exploring Theory, Policy and Practice Across Europe, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treseder, P. (1997). Empowering Children and Young People: Promoting Involvement in Decision Making. London: Children’s Rights Office and Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2006). Report of the Independent Expert for the United Nations Study on Violence Against Children, General Assembly, A/61/299, 29 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Women. (2015). UN Women’s Youth and Gender Equality Strategy: Empowered Young Women and Young Men as Partners in Achieving Gender Equality, Draft 18 September 2015, United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2003a). Building a World Fit for Children: The United Nations General Assembly Special Session on Children 8–10 May 2002. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund. http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/pub_build_wffc_en.pdf

  • UNICEF. (2003b). The State of the World’s Children 2003. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2010). Handbook: Children as Advocates – Strengthening Child and Young People’s Participation in Advocacy Fora. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M., & Unterhalter, E. (Eds.). (2007). Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. C. (2002). Being, Becoming and Relationship: Conceptual Challenges of a Child Rights Approach in Development. Journal of International Development, 14(8), 1095–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M., & Faulkner, D. (2008). Subjects, Objects or Participants: Dilemmas of Psychological Research with Children. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices. London: Falmer Press/Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, R., & Moore, K. (2003). Including Disabled People in Poverty Reduction Work: “Nothing About Us Without Us”. World Development, 13(3), 571–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zermatten, J. (2005). Les enfants ont des droits: une révolution? [Children Have Rights: Is It a Revolution?]. Sion: Institut Universitaire Kurt Bösch/Institut international des Droits de l’Enfant.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Biggeri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Progress Towards Children’s Participation

Appendix: Progress Towards Children’s Participation

Global progress towards promoting child participation can be summarized as follows:

  • 1989: Article 12 of the UNConvention on the Rights of the Child(CRC)lays down the basic principle and purpose of the meaningful and ethical participation of children and young people.

  • 2002: A World Fit for Children is adopted by the UN General Assembly. Paragraph 32 of this document includes a strong commitment towards increasing the participation of children.

  • 2006: Report of the independent expert for the UnitedNations study on violence against children ‘recommend that States actively engage with children and respect their views in all aspects of prevention, response and monitoring of violence against them, taking into account article 12 of the Conventionon the Rights of the Child. Children’s organizations and child-led initiatives to address violence guided by the best interests of the child should be supported and encouraged’ (UN, 2006, para 106).

  • 2007: Article 7 of theUNConvention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities(CRPD) states with respect to children that ‘Parties shall take all necessary measures to ensure the full enjoyment by children with disabilities of all humanrights and fundamental freedoms on an equal basis with other children’. And that ‘Parties shall ensure that children with disabilities have the right to express their views freely on all matters affecting them, their views being given due weight in accordance with their age and maturity, on an equal basis with other children, and to be provided with disability and age-appropriate assistance to realize that right’ (CRPD, 2018).

  • 2009:UNGeneral Assembly Resolution on the Rights of the Child (the ‘Omnibus resolution’). The resolution details various facets of the Rights of the child to be heard, encouraging children’s participation in all settings on matters affecting them. Among other things, Governments are called on to designate, establish, and strengthen relevant structures for children, to involve them in enacting the national action plans set out in ‘A world fit for children’, and to ensure the equal participation of girls, including adolescent women.

  • 2009: UNCRC adopted General Comment 12 on the Right of the Child to be Heard. This elaborates in detail on the scope of Article 12, and how the Committee expects governments to interpret their obligations to children under its provision.

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Biggeri, M., Arciprete, C., Karkara, R. (2019). Children and Youth Participation in Decision-Making and Research Processes. In: Clark, D.A., Biggeri, M., Frediani, A.A. (eds) The Capability Approach, Empowerment and Participation. Rethinking International Development series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-35230-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics