Abstract
Interest has been widely investigated through questionnaire surveys in traditional psychology. A scrutiny of the language used in interest questionnaires shows differences in terms of language used. Despite claiming to investigate ‘interest’, what is being measured through questionnaire surveys may not always be the same construct. Dissatisfaction with such traditional psychological approaches has given rise to alternative methods: a discursive psychological and a dynamic system approach. Interest is not only a psychological phenomenon but also a social, discursive construct, which meaning is co-constructed through our conversations with others about interest. Interest as a dynamic system has a reciprocal relation with other dynamic systems and thus should.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 391–405.
Ainley, M. (2013). One ingredient in the mix: Interest and psychological well-being. In A. Efklides & D. Moraitou (Eds.), A positive psychology perspective on quality of life (Social indicators research series, Vol. 51, pp. 243–258). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.
Dan, Y., & Todd, R. (2014). Examining the mediating effect of learning strategies on the relationship between students’ history interest and achievement. Educational Psychology, 34(7), 799–817.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink, E. A., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105–122.
Hiller, H. H., & DiLuzio, L. (2004). The interviewee and the research interview: Analysing a neglected dimension in research. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 41(1), 1–26.
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., et al. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 647–671.
O’Keefe, P. A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). The role of interest in optimizing performance and self-regulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 70–78.
Potter, J. (2005). Making psychology relevant. Discourse & Society, 16, 739–747.
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2014). Situational interest and learning: Thirst for knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 32, 37–50.
Roth, W.-M. (2008). The nature of scientific conceptions: A discursive psychological perspective. Educational Research Review, 3, 30–50.
Roth, W.-M., & Hsu, P.-L. (2008). Interest and motivation: A cultural historical and discursive psychological approach. In J. E. Larson (Ed.), Educational psychology: Cognition and learning, individual differences and motivation (pp. 81–112). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
Roth, W.-M., Lee, Y. J., & Hwang, S.-W. (2008). Culturing conceptions: From first principles. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 231–261.
Schraw, G. (1997). Situational interest in literary text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 436–456.
Silvia, P. J. (2008a). Appraisal components and emotion traits: Examining the appraisal basis of trait curiosity. Cognition and Emotion, 22(1), 94–114.
Silvia, P. J. (2008b). Interest—The curious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 57–60.
van der Sluis, F. (2013). When complexity becomes interesting: An inquiry into the information experience. CTIT Ph.D.-thesis series no. 13–262 (ISSN: 1381–3617). Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT), The Netherlands. Retrieved October 9, 2015, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.396.1811&rep=rep1&type=pdf
van der Sluis, F., van den Broek, E. L., Glassey, R. J., van Dijk, E. M. A. G., & de Jong, F. M. G. (2014). When complexity becomes interesting. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(7), 1478–1500.
Swarat, S. (2008). What makes a topic interesting? A conceptual and methodological exploration of the underlying dimensions of topic interest. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(2), 1–26.
Swarat, S., Ortony, A., & Revelle, W. (2012). Activity matters: Understanding student interest in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 515–537.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (2006). Dynamic systems theories. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 258–312). Hoboken: Wiley.
Tin, T. B. (2006). Investigating the nature of ‘interest’ reported by a group of postgraduate students in an MA in English language teacher education programme. System, 34(2), 222–238.
Tin, T. B. (2008). Exploring the nature of the relation between interest and comprehension. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(5), 525–536.
Tin, T. B. (2009a). ‘Emergence and maintenance of student teachers’ ‘interest’ within the context of two-hour lectures: An actual genetic perspective. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 109–133.
Tin, T. B. (2009b). Features of the most interesting and the least interesting postgraduate second language acquisition lectures offered by three lecturers. Language and Education, 23(2), 117–135.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tin, T.B. (2016). Studying ‘Interest’: Approaches and Methodological Issues. In: Stimulating Student Interest in Language Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-34042-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-34042-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-34041-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-34042-9
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)