Skip to main content

A Postscript to the Twentieth Century: Mainstream and Celebrated Limitations, and Counter-narratives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mixed Race Britain in The Twentieth Century

Abstract

From 2000 onwards the image of racially mixed families and people in Britain has been one firmly coalesced around new dominant understandings, where mixedness is posited as both mainstream and celebratory as well as a ‘new’ phenomenon. This postscript chapter offers some thoughts on the factors propelling this continued shift in perspective and how such representations are actually often at variance with lived experiences and statistical reality, as well as how the twenty-first century ‘mixed race project’ fits into the wider historical context of racial mixing and mixedness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, the SCOPUS corpus of literature reflects scholarly attention, UK-attributed articles including the lemmatised term ‘mixed race’ increasing from 9 articles (1993–1999) to 21 (2000–2006) and 49 (2007–2013). Commensurate counts (for England) in Web of Knowledge increased from 14 articles (1993–1999) to 26 (2000–2006) and 40 (2007–2013). Two-thirds of the key British ‘foundation texts’ on ‘mixed race’ show an upward or stable trend in citations till 2010 (Aspinall 2015).

  2. 2.

    For example, between 2008 and 2010, an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)-funded seminar series ‘Thinking About Mixedness and Mixing: International and Interdisciplinary Dialogue’, held at London South Bank University, brought together speakers from Britain, Europe, North America and Australasia; similarly the Critical Mixed Race Studies journal launched in 2011 has an international board.

  3. 3.

    See: Aspinall 2015.

  4. 4.

    http://www.pih.org.uk/images/documents/mr_js_09.pdf [date accessed 19.06.2017].

  5. 5.

    For example, Intermix’s online forums having attracted around 25,000 posts by 8000 members. The Mix-d Museum website has received over 116,000 views from 180 countries, and the UK blog www.mixedracefamily.com has registered 70,000 page views (see Aspinall 2015).

  6. 6.

    See Mail on Sunday, 8 December 2002; The Observer, 11 July 2004.

  7. 7.

    Through Agyeman’s character, the time travelling series has explored the longstanding black presence in Britain several times, including in Elizabethan and Edwardian England.

  8. 8.

    https://ikon-gallery.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Gillian-Wearing-chosen-family-PR-FINAL.pdf [date accessed 19.06.2017] (see Aspinall 2015). Criticism of the statue seems mostly to have centred on the fact that it represents single mothers as a ‘real Birmingham family’ rather than the fact that the mothers are of mixed race. See Birmingham Post, 6 November 2014.

  9. 9.

    Newsweek, 9 November 2003.

  10. 10.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/8618606.stm [date accessed 19.06.2017].

  11. 11.

    Broadcast, 2 November 2009.

  12. 12.

    The Observer, 23 July 2003.

  13. 13.

    Channel 4 announced that ‘today mixed race is the fastest growing demographic predicted to become Britain’s largest ethnic group by 2020’ (Channel 4 Corporation, 2009).

  14. 14.

    See Aspinall (2015).

  15. 15.

    www.mix-d.org/museum/timeline/london-2012-olympics [date accessed 19.06.2017].

  16. 16.

    The dataset had 130 ‘Other Mixed Heritage’ verbatim descriptions (81.3% of those who selected ‘Other Mixed’). These were individuals who eschewed the census pre-designated ‘mixed’ categories to provide a write-in response and so were a residual group (see Aspinall 2015).

  17. 17.

    For some accounts of abuse suffered by interracial couples in the UK, see also The Sunday Express, 12 May 2002; The Sunday Times, 9 April 2000; The Herald, 7 December 2000; The Mirror, 2 September 1998. Also, the BBC2 documentary Love Thy Neighbour, aired 13 August 2003.

  18. 18.

    Guardian, 4 October 2011.

  19. 19.

    The Voice, 28 November 2008.

  20. 20.

    Similarly, as Camacho points out, if more racially mixed people equals greater tolerance, then Brazil—and most of Latin America—should be a racial paradise. [Yet] Indigenous and Afro-descendent people in Latin America remain disproportionately poor, discriminated against, and locked out. The Guardian, 1 April 2017.

  21. 21.

    The Guardian, 1 April 2017.

  22. 22.

    See for example, Bellos (2007) and Lewis (2009: 21).

  23. 23.

    SuAndi, ‘The Truth in Knowing/Now: A Conversation across the African Diaspora’, University of Hull, 12 October 2007, cited in McNeil (2010: 144). With thanks to SuAndi for the full quotation.

  24. 24.

    Like Donnette Francis (2015) we co-opt this phrase from Thompson’s (2009) discussion of African American middle-class sexuality.

References

  • Ali, S. 2003. Mixed-Race, Post-Race: Gender, New Ethnicities and Cultural Practices. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alibhai-Brown, Y. 2001. Mixed Feelings: The Complex Lives of Mixed Race Britons. London: The Women’s Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinall, P.J. 2009. “Mixed Race”, “Mixed Origins”, or What? Generic Terminology for the Multiple Racial/Ethnic Group Population. Anthropology Today 25 (2): 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Social Representations of ‘Mixed-Race’ in Early Twenty-First-Century Britain: Content, Limitations, and Counter-Narratives. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (7): 1067–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Measuring the Health Patterns of the ‘Mixed/Multiple’ Ethnic Group in Britain: Data Quality Problems, Reporting Issues, and Implications for Policy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1399623

  • Aspinall, P.J, and C. Caballero. 2013. ‘Broken Blossoms’, ‘Undesirable Elements’ … Or ‘Ordinary Families’?: Social Attitudes Towards and Lived Experiences of Anglo-Chinese Mixing in Britain, 1900–1950. Asian American Literary Review 4 (2): 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinall, P.J., and M. Song. 2013. Mixed Race Identities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, E. 2010. The Creolisation of London Kinship: Mixed African-Caribbean and White British Extended Families, 1950–2003. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bellos, L. 2007. Against the Term ‘Mixed-Race’. Accessed 29 June 2017. http://mixedness.millipedia.net/Default.aspx.LocID-0hgnew0yt.RefLocID-0hg01l0hg01l001.Lang-EN.html

  • Bland, L. 2005. White Women and Men of Colour: Miscegenation Fears in Britain after the Great War. Gender & History 17 (1): 29–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, B. 2006. Who are the ‘Mixed’ Ethnic Group? London: ONS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, C. 2005. ‘Mixed Race Projects’: Perceptions, Constructions and Implications of Mixed Race in the UK and USA. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. From ‘Draughtboard Alley’ to ‘Brown Britain’: The Ordinariness of Racial Mixing and Mixedness in British Society. In International Perspectives on Racial Mixing and Mixedness, ed. R. Edwards, S. Ali, C. Caballero, and M. Song. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Mixing Race in Britain: The Influence of Academic Publics. In The Entrepreneurial University: Engaging Publics, Intersecting Impacts, ed. Y. Taylor, 223–241. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, C., and R. Edwards. 2010. Lone Mothers of Mixed Racial and Ethnic Children: Then and Now. London: Runnymede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, C., R. Edwards, A. Goodyer, and T. Okitikpi. 2012. The Diversity and Complexity of the Everyday Lives of Mixed Racial and Ethnic Families. Adoption & Fostering 36 (3–4): 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, C., R. Edwards, and S. Puthussery. 2008. Parenting ‘Mixed’ Children: Negotiating Difference and Belonging in Mixed Race, Ethnicity and Faith Families. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Care Quality Commission. 2011. Count Me in 2010: Results of the 2010 National Census of Inpatients and Patients on Supervised Community Treatment in Mental Health and Learning Disability Services in England and Wales. London: Care Quality Commission and National Mental Health Development Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, M. 2000. Multiracial Identity: An International Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, D.A. 2010. Projections of the Ethnic Minority Populations of the United Kingdom 2006–2056. Population and Development Review 36 (3): 441–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. 2011. Youth Cohort Study & Longitudinal Study of Young People in England. The Activities and Experiences of 19 Year Olds: England 2010. London: Department of Education & National Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewan, I. 2008. Recasting Race: Women of Mixed Heritage in Further Education. Staffordshire: Trentham Books Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, I., and S. Clarke. 1989. Demographic Patterns Among Britain’s Ethnic Groups. In The Changing Population of Britain, ed. H. Joshi. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R., S. Ali, C. Caballero, and M. Song, eds. 2012. International Perspectives on Mixing and Mixedness. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equality Challenge Unit. 2013. Equality in Higher Education: Statistical Report 2013. Part 2: Students. London: Equality Challenge Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R., R. Jolley, S. Katwala, and B. Mehta. 2012. The Melting Pot Generation. How Britain Became More Relaxed on Race. London: British Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, D. 2015. “Neither Pathological Nor Perfect”: Joyce Gladwell’s Late Autobiographical Challenge to the Windrush Generation. In Beyond Windrush: Rethinking Postwar Anglophone Caribbean Literature, ed. J. Dillon Brown and L.R. Rosenberg. USA: University Press of Mississippi.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, V. 2010. Experiences of Racism and the Changing Nature of White Privilege Among Lone White Mothers of Mixed-Parentage Children in the UK. Ethnic and Racial Studies 33 (2): 176–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifekwunigwe, J.O. 2004. ‘Mixed Race’ Studies: A Reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, R.L. 2013. Transcending Blackness: From the New Millenium Mulatta to the Exceptional Multiracial. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julme, T. 2003. Marketing Ethnic Ambiguity: Who Benefits from Advertising’s Latest Trend?. Accessed 16 June 2003. www.brown.edu/Students/INDY?article.php?id=21&issue_id=184

  • Katwala, S. 2012. Introduction. In The Melting Pot Generation. How Britain Became More Relaxed on Race, ed. R. Ford, R. Jolley, S. Katwala, and B. Mehta. London: British Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. 2009. Birthing Racial Difference: Conversations with My Mother and Others. Studies in the Maternal 1 (1): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M.B. 2010. Why are Mixed-Race People Perceived as More Attractive? Perception 39 (1): 136–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh, M. 2005. Interethnic Unions. DMAG Update 2005/12. London: GLA (Data Management and Analysis Group).

    Google Scholar 

  • McFall, S.L., ed. 2012. Understanding Society: Findings 2012. Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckenzie, L. 2010. Finding Value on a Council Estate: Complex Lives, Motherhood, and Exclusion. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, D. 2010. Sex and Race in the Black Atlantic: Mulatto Devils and Multiracial Messiahs. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. 2011. Statistics on Race and the Criminal Justice System 2010: A Ministry of Justice Publication Under Section 95 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, D., and C. Street. 2014. Mixed Experiences. Growing Up Mixed Race—Mental Health and Well-Being. London: National Children’s Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muttarak, R. 2004. Marital Assimilation: Interethnic Marriage in Britain. Paper presented at 12th Biennial Conference, Australian Population Association, 15–17 September, Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics. 2012. Ethnicity and National Identity in England and Wales 2011. London: ONS.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. What Does the 2011 Census Tell Us About Interethnic Relationships? London: ONS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Population Censuses and Surveys/General Register Office (Scotland) (OPCS/GRO(S)). 1993. 1991 Census Ethnic Group and Country of Birth, Great Britain. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okitikpi, T. 2009. Understanding Interracial Relationships. London: Russell House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olumide, J. 2002. Raiding the Gene Pool: The Social Construction of Mixed Race. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • ONS. 2005. Focus on Ethnicity and Identity. London: ONS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, C., and J. Statham. 2009. Disproportionality in Child Welfare: The Prevalence of Black and Minority Ethnic Children Within the ‘Looked After’ and ‘Children in Need’ Populations and on Child Protection Registers in England. London: DSCF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D., and M. Song. 2001. Rethinking ‘Mixed Race’. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, F. 2016. Fostering Mixed Race Children: Everyday Experiences of Foster Care. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, W. 1987. Politics and the Measurement of Ethnicity. In The Politics of Numbers, ed. W. Alonso and P. Starr, 187–234. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, K. 2013. What is Your Race. The Census and Our Flawed Efforts to Classify Americans. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, P. 2008. What Happens When International Migrants Settle? Projections of Ethnic Groups in United Kingdom Regions. In International Migration in Europe: Data, Models and Estimates, ed. J. Raymer and F. Willekens, 330–358. London: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G., et al. 2005. Attractiveness of Own-Race, Other-Race, and Mixed-Race Faces. Perception 34: 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root, M., ed. 1996. The Multiracial Experience: Racial Borders as the New Frontier. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, L. 2012. More Segregation or More Mixing? Manchester: Manchester Centre on Dynamics of Ethnicity.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. How Have People’s Ethnic Identities Changed in England and Wales? Manchester: Manchester Centre on Dynamics of Ethnicity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, J.P. 2012. Beautiful Stereotypes: The Relationship Between Physical Attractiveness and Mixed Race Identity. Identities 19 (1): 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, S. 2001. Colour, Culture and Class: Interrogating Interracial Marriage and People of Mixed Racial Descent in the USA. In Rethinking ‘Mixed Race’, ed. D. Parker and M. Song. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeter, C.A. 2003. The Hazards of Visibility: “Biracial” Women, Media Images and Narratives of Identity. In New Faces in a Changing America: Multiracial Identity in the 21st Century, ed. L. Winters and H. DeBose. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabili, L. 1996. ‘Women of a Very Low Type’: Crossing Racial Boundaries in Imperial Britain. In Gender and Class in Modern Europe, ed. L.L. Frader and S.O. Rose. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L.B. 2009. Beyond the Black Lady: Sexuality and the New African-American Middle-Class. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikly, L., C. Caballero, J. Haynes, and J. Hill. 2004. Understanding the Educational Needs of Mixed Heritage Pupils. London: Department for Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tizard, B., and A. Phoenix. 2002. Black, White or Mixed Race: Race and Racism in the Lives of Young People of Mixed Parentage. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. First edition 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twine, F.W. 2010. A White Side of Black Britain: Interracial Intimacy and Racial Literacy. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. 2010. Mixed Matters: Mixed-Race Pupils Discuss School and Identity. Leicester: Troubadour.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohland, P., P. Rees, P. Norman, P. Boden, and M. Jasinska. 2010. Ethnic Population Projections for the UK and Local Areas, 2001–2051. Working Paper 10/02. School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Caballero, C., Aspinall, P.J. (2018). A Postscript to the Twentieth Century: Mainstream and Celebrated Limitations, and Counter-narratives. In: Mixed Race Britain in The Twentieth Century. Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-33928-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-33928-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-33927-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-33928-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics