Advertisement

Foreign Policy

  • Judi Atkins
Chapter
  • 183 Downloads
Part of the Rhetoric, Politics and Society book series (RPS)

Abstract

This chapter examines the Coalition’s case for humanitarian intervention in Libya (2011) and Syria (2013). It shows that, in both parliamentary debates, Cameron and Clegg employed identification through antithesis to distinguish their approach from the 2003 Iraq war. Buttressing this strategy were appeals for ideological and instrumental identification, which, respectively, were founded on the principle of humanitarian intervention and conceptions of the ‘national interest’. While MPs overwhelmingly supported the mission in Libya, they refused to back military action against Syria. Here, the Coalition’s case for intervention resembled that of Blair in several important respects, notably the bypassing of the UN. This prevented the partners from creating a clear contrast between Iraq and Syria, and so undermined their efforts to foster identification through antithesis.

References

  1. Atkins, J. (2006). A New Approach to Humanitarian Intervention? Tony Blair’s ‘Doctrine of the International Community’. British Politics, 1(2), 274–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkins, J. (2011). Justifying New Labour Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BBC. (2011, March 21). In Full: UK Government’s Legal Note on Libya. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12810050
  4. Beech, M., & Oliver, T. J. (2014). Humanitarian Intervention and Foreign Policy in the Conservative-Led Coalition. Parliamentary Affairs, 67(1), 102–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blair, T. (1999, April 24). Doctrine of the International Community. Retrieved from http://www.britishpoliticalspeech.org/speech-archive.htm?speech=279
  6. Cameron, D. (2013, August 27). Syria: Transcript of PM’s Interview. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/syria-transcript-of-pms-interview
  7. Cheney, G. (1983). The Rhetoric of Identification and the Study of Organizational Communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69(2), 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke, M. (2015). The Coalition and Foreign Affairs. In A. Seldon & M. Finn (Eds.), The Coalition Effect 2010–2015 (pp. 345–369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clegg, N. (2011a, March 29). An Axis of Openness: Renewing Multilateralism for the 21st Century. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/an-axis-of-openness-renewing-multilateralism-for-the-21st-century
  10. Clegg, N. (2011b, August 22). Arab Spring Speech. Retrieved from http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2011/08/22/nick-clegg-arab-spring-speech-in-fulll
  11. Clegg, N. (2013a, August 27). Syria: Transcript of Nick Clegg’s Interview. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/syria-transcript-of-nick-cleggs-interview
  12. Clegg, N. (2013b, August 28). ‘This Is Not Iraq’: Nick Clegg’s Email to Party Members on Syria. Retrieved from https://www.markpack.org.uk/45141/this-is-not-iraq-nick-cleggs-email-to-party-members-on-syria/
  13. Daddow, O. (2013). The Use of Force in British Foreign Policy: From New Labour to the Coalition. The Political Quarterly, 84(1), 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daddow, O., & Schnapper, P. (2013). Liberal Intervention in the Foreign Policy Thinking of Tony Blair and David Cameron. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 26(2), 330–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. d’Ancona, M. (2013). In It Together: The Inside Story of the Coalition Government. London: Viking.Google Scholar
  16. Hague, W. (2011a, March 22). A Turning Point for Africa? Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/a-turning-point-for-africa
  17. Hague, W. (2011b, May 4). We Will Continue to Fight Against Terrorism Wherever It Rears Its Head. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/we-will-continue-to-fight-against-terrorism-wherever-it-rears-its-head
  18. Hajer, M. A. (1997). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamre, J., Barton, F., Crocker, B., Mendelson-Forman, J., and Orr, R. (2003, July 17). Iraq’s Post-Conflict Reconstruction: A Field Review and Recommendations. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/Iraq_Trip_Report.pdf
  20. Hardman, I. (2013, August 29). Syria Defeat: What Happened to the Whips? The Spectator. Retrieved from https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2013/08/syria-defeat-what-happened-to-the-whips/
  21. HC Deb., 21 March 2011, vol. 524 cols. 704–801.Google Scholar
  22. HC Deb., 29 August 2013, vol. 566 cols. 1427–1521.Google Scholar
  23. Kaarbo, J., & Kenealy, D. (2016). No, Prime Minister: Explaining the House of Commons’ Vote on Intervention in Syria. European Security, 25(1), 28–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laws, D. (2016). Coalition: The Inside Story of the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition Government. London: Biteback Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  25. Oliver, T. J. (2015). Intervention by Design or Failure: The Coalition and Humanitarian Intervention. The Political Quarterly, 86(1), 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ralph, J. (2011). After Chilcot: The ‘Doctrine of International Community’ and the UK Decision to Invade Iraq. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 13(3), 304–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seldon, A., & Snowdon, P. (2015). Cameron at 10: The Inside Story 2010–2015. London: William Collins.Google Scholar
  28. Strong, J. (2015). Interpreting the Syria Vote: Parliament and British Foreign Policy. International Affairs, 91(5), 1123–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vickers, R. (2015). Foreign Policy and International Development. In M. Beech & S. Lee (Eds.), The Conservative-Liberal Coalition: Examining the Cameron-Clegg Government (pp. 227–242). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judi Atkins
    • 1
  1. 1.Coventry UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations