Advertisement

Constitutional Reform

  • Judi Atkins
Chapter
  • 170 Downloads
Part of the Rhetoric, Politics and Society book series (RPS)

Abstract

Following intense negotiations, the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats agreed to equalize constituency boundaries and hold a referendum on the Alternative Vote (AV). The chapter examines the parliamentary debate on these reforms, showing that both sides employed different definitions of ‘fairness’ to foster ideological identification. This concept also dominated Cameron’s case against AV in a bitter referendum campaign, and the ensuing friction between the leaders was manifested in a dispute over House of Lords reform. The analysis reveals that this conflict stemmed from the parties’ different interpretations of the Coalition Agreement, which were shaped by their perceived interests. Consequently, Liberal Democrats could justify their decision to back the postponement of the boundary review, which angered the Conservatives but allowed the junior partner to reassert its distinctiveness.

References

  1. BBC. (2013, January 14). Peers Vote to Block MP Constituency Boundary Changes. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21016025
  2. Blau, A. (2004). Fairness and Electoral Reform. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(2), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bogdanor, V. (2011). The Coalition and the Constitution. Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Cameron, D. (2011a, February 18). Votes Referendum: Cameron’s Speech in Full. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12504935
  5. Cameron, D. (2011b, March 6). Speech to Conservative Spring Conference. Retrieved from http://www.newstatesman.com/2011/03/enterprise-government-party
  6. Cameron, D. (2011c, April 30). Why Keeping First Past the Post Is Vital for Democracy. Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/av-referendum/8485118/David-Cameron-why-keeping-first-past-the-post-is-vital-for-democracy.html
  7. Clegg, N. (2011a, February 18). Votes Referendum: Clegg Speech in Full. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12504941
  8. Clegg, N. (2011b, April 9). AV is a Very British Reform. Retrieved from http://www.libdemvoice.org/clegg-av-is-a-very-british-reform-23757.html
  9. Clegg, N. (2011c, April 21). AV Gives People More Power, More Choice. Retrieved from http://www.libdemvoice.org/nick-cleggs-speech-at-the-ippr-on-political-reform-23865.html
  10. Clegg, N. (2012, August 6). Statement on House of Lords Reform. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-19146853
  11. Clegg, N. (2016). Politics: Between the Extremes. London: The Bodley Head.Google Scholar
  12. Curtice, J. (2013). Politicians, Voters and Democracy: The 2011 UK Referendum on the Alternative Vote. Electoral Studies, 32(2), 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Curtice, J. (2015). The Coalition, Elections and Referendums. In A. Seldon & M. Finn (Eds.), The Coalition Effect 2010–2015 (pp. 577–597). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. d’Ancona, M. (2013). In It Together: The Inside Story of the Coalition Government. London: Viking.Google Scholar
  15. Finn, M. (2015). The Coalition and the Liberal Democrats. In A. Seldon & M. Finn (Eds.), The Coalition Effect 2010–2015 (pp. 492–519). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Grice, A. (2009, December 23). Review of the Year 2009: Expenses Scandal. Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/andrew-grice/review-of-the-year-2009-expenses-scandal-1847865.html
  17. Hazell, R., & Yong, B. (2012). The Politics of Coalition: How the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Government Works. Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  18. HC Deb., 6 September 2010, vol. 515 cols. 34–116.Google Scholar
  19. HC Deb., 29 January 2013, vol. 557 cols. 806–840.Google Scholar
  20. HM Government. (2010). The Coalition: Our Programme for Government. London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
  21. Laws, D. (2016). Coalition: The Inside Story of the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition Government. London: Biteback Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  22. Liberal Democrats. (2010). Liberal Democrat Manifesto 2010. London: Liberal Democrats.Google Scholar
  23. Loughlin, M., & Viney, C. (2015). The Coalition and the Constitution. In A. Seldon & M. Finn (Eds.), The Coalition Effect 2010–2015 (pp. 59–86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Norton, P. (2011). The Con-Lib Agenda for the ‘New Politics’ and Constitutional Reform. In S. Lee & M. Beech (Eds.), The Cameron-Clegg Government: Coalition Politics in an Age of Austerity (pp. 153–167). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Norton, P. (2012). Coalition Cohesion. In T. Heppell & D. Seawright (Eds.), Cameron and the Conservatives: The Transition to Coalition Government (pp. 181–193). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Norton, P., & Thompson, L. (2015). Parliament and the Constitution: The Coalition in Conflict. In M. Beech & S. Lee (Eds.), The Conservative-Liberal Coalition: Examining the Cameron-Clegg Government (pp. 129–144). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judi Atkins
    • 1
  1. 1.Coventry UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations