Skip to main content

Protecting: Assembling Infant Embodied Vulnerability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Childhood and Markets

Part of the book series: Studies in Childhood and Youth ((SCY))

  • 252 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the enactment of protecting as one of the main teleoaffective qualities of child caring. I examine how this teleoaffective priority is produced and maintained in the commercial world through the theme of infant safety, and the constitution of ‘the young child’ as vulnerable in embodied ways. Infant commodity culture is crowded with products that are designed to ‘safeguard’, ‘guide’, ‘monitor’ and ‘promote the health of’ the young child, and my analysis therefore starts with a consideration of three ways in which safety connects with products. I then move on to consider renditions of the young child as vulnerable, enigmatic and unpredictable. Performances of the youngest of children as vulnerable and enigmatic open up opportunities for pecuniary value creation through product innovation and problem multiplication in which techno-medical-science ways of knowing the infant child abound, and in which ‘the child’ is not in any way held responsible (and thus rendered innocent). Performances of the young child as unpredictable, as opposed to enigmatic, point to shifting understandings of vulnerability in relation to age, development and agency. In the final part of the chapter, I draw on my interviews with prospective and new parents to discuss how protecting children gains affective salience through the co-occurrence of vulnerability with lovable and purity. I here also compare commercial and parental enactments of the young child.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Which? Guide is a publication—now present as an online resource—from the UK’s charity the Consumer’s Association.

  2. 2.

    https://www.mothercare.com/advice-buying-guides-and-services/advice/babys-here/caring-for-your-baby/baby-proofing-your-home/advice-ms-baby-caring-sub17.html, accessed on 12 January 2018.

  3. 3.

    The websites analysed here were those of Phillips Avent , Tommee Tippee, NUK, MAM, and Dr. Brown’s. All date from April and May 2013. Tommee Tippee is an American owned company, which has a major production site in the UK. Philips Avent is the merged outcome of the British infant feeding tools brand company Avent, and the Dutch domestic technologies giant Philips. The merger took place in 2006, which signals the shift to a ‘mixed feeding’ narrative (see Chapter 7). MAM is of Austrian origin. NUK originates in Germany. These brand companies all trade globally. The website content of these international commercial organisations change regularly, and many maintain different sites for specific countries. In 2013, for instance, NUK had a ‘generic’ international English language site, and also sites for a range of different countries. For some countries, the organization of the site differed considerably from that of the international site, for others, some or all of the materials used on the international site were used. For NUK and MAM, I analysed the international English language sites. I analysed the UK sites of the other companies. As website content changes over time, the procedure I used was to copy the website content of each brand-company by making screen prints of each page of information, and by storing any additional materials, including any information brochures that were available from the sites. This allowed for the archival of textual and visual materials to return to later.

  4. 4.

    A thank you to my colleague Dr. Emma Head, with whom I had an interesting conversation on finger sucking and its historical association with the malformation of children’s mouths and teeth.

  5. 5.

    The Technology in Motion website was consulted on 11 May 2016, at https://www.technologyinmotion.com/flat-head-syndrome/what-is-flat-head-syndrome/.

  6. 6.

    The product demonstration video on the SleepCurve website was consulted on 11 May 2016, and found at http://www.sleepcurve.com/why-buy-a-sleepcurve-mattress/.

Bibliography

  • Afflerback, S., S.K. Carter, A.K. Anthony, and L. Grauerholz. 2013. Infant feeding consumerism in the age of intensive mothering and risk society. Journal of Consumer Culture 13 (3): 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apple, R.D. 1996. Vitamania: Vitamins in American culture. Camden: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, P. 2016. Liquid materialities: A history of milk, science and the law. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backett-Milburn, K., and J. Harden. 2004. How children and their families construct and negotiate risk, safety and danger. Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research 11 (4): 429–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. 1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P.H. 2000. Childhood and the cultural constitution of vulnerable bodies. In The body, childhood and society, ed. A. Prout, 38–59. London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D.T. 2004. The commodification of childhood: The children’s clothing industry and the rise of the child consumer. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coutant, A., V.I. de La Ville, M. Gram, and N. Boireau. 2011. Motherhood, advertising, and anxiety: A cross-cultural perspective on Danonino commercials. Advertising & Society Review 12 (2): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Tim. 1997. Men in the mirror: Men’s fashion, masculinity and consumer society. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, P. 1994. The consuming body. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, H. 2008. Protecting children in time. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furedi, F. 2008. Paranoid parenting: Why ignoring the experts may be best for your child. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honeyman, S. 2005. Elusive childhood: Impossible representations in modern fiction. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, C. 2005. Childhood. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J., and H. Stapleton. 2013. ‘It won’t do her any harm’ they said, ‘or they wouldn’t put it on the market’. In Motherhoods, markets and consumption: The making of mothers in contemporary Western cultures, ed. S. O’Donohoe, M. Hogg, P. Maclaran, L. Martens, and L. Stevens, 71–87. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, S. 2000. Mothering the self: Mothers, daughters, subjectivities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, L. 2000. He was a real baby, with baby things: A material culture analysis of personhood, parenthood and pregnancy loss. Journal of Material Culture 5 (3): 321–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackendrick, N. 2014. More work for mother: Chemical body burdens as a maternal responsibility. Gender & Society 28 (5): 705–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, L. 2014. Selling infant safety: Entanglements of childhood preciousness, vulnerability and unpredictability. Special issue entitled “New parents and young children in consumer culture”. Young Consumers 15 (3): 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, L., and S. Scott. 2006. Under the kitchen surface: Domestic products and conflicting constructions of home. Home Cultures 3 (1): 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M.K. 2008. Watching children: Describing the use of baby monitors on the Epinions.com. Journal of Family Issues 29 (4): 516–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M.K. 2010. Parenting out of control: Anxious parents in uncertain times. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimmo, R. 2010. Milk, modernity and the making of the human: Purifying the social. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimmo, R. 2011. Actor-network theory and methodology: Social research in a more-than-human world. Methodological Innovations Online 6 (3): 108–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, J.P., K.E. Tyner, and S. Schofield-Tomschin. 2011. Watching over baby: Expectant parenthood and the duty to be well. Sociological Inquiry 81 (3): 285–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton, N. 1991. Governing the family: Child care, child protection and the state. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prout, A. 2005. The future of childhood. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyyhtinen, A. 2016. More-than-human sociology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. 2002. The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine G., and J. McKendrck. (1997). Children’s outdoor play: Exploring parental concerns about children’s safety and the changing nature of childhood. Geoforum 28 (2): 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lydia Martens .

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Martens, L. (2018). Protecting: Assembling Infant Embodied Vulnerability. In: Childhood and Markets . Studies in Childhood and Youth. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-31503-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-31503-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-230-28425-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31503-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics