Part of the Studies in Childhood and Youth book series (SCY)


In the conclusion of Childhood and Markets, I review the substantive and theoretical reasons for the work done in this book on the practice of child caring. Drawing on theoretical resources from theories of practices, and inspiration from feminist and science and technology theory, I revisit how the book has attended to, and illustrated, the ongoing processes through which this practice’s teleoaffective qualities are performed, and the implications of these qualities for the work of child caring and the sales of goods. One of the book’s main arguments has been that these qualities are essentially ways of understanding the young child, and that these lead to the whys and hows of child caring. An analytical nuance developed in the book is also highlighted. This is that the teleoaffective qualities of child caring converges around a distinct set of primary qualities: those of loving, vulnerability, purity and stimulation. However, much cultural work and contestation underlies the achievement of these homogeneous and purified qualities. I return to some of the questions asked in the book’s Introduction. This includes the argument that childhood and markets are equally generative, with both informing practices and carrying cultural weight. I also argue that future research on children, childhood, and consumer culture needs to attend more closely to children’s age, to the generational qualities of both child caring and wider understandings of children, and to the intermediating importance of love.


Consumer Culture Child Care Young Children adultsAdults Teleoaffective Structures 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Beckert, J. 2009. The social order of markets. Theory and Society 38 (3): 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bettany, S.M., B. Kerrane, and M.K. Hogg. 2014. The material-semiotics of fatherhood: The co-emergence of technology and contemporary fatherhood. Journal of Business Research 67 (7): 1544–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brownlie, J., and V. Leith. 2011. Social bundles: Thinking through the infant body. Childhood 18 (2): 196–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brusdal, R., and I. Frønes. 2013. The purchase of moral positions: An essay on the markets of concerned parenting. International Journal of Consumer Studies 37 (2): 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckingham, D. 2000. After the death of childhood. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Buckingham, D. 2011. The material child. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  7. Cairns, K., J. Johnston, and N. MacKendrick. 2013. Feeding the ‘organic child’: Mothering through ethical consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture 13 (2): 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cook, D.T. 2004. The commodification of childhood: The children’s clothing industry and the rise of the child consumer. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook, D.T. 2008. The missing child in consumption theory. Journal of Consumer Culture 8 (2): 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cross, G. 2002. Valves of desire: A historian’s perspective on parents, children, and marketing. Journal of Consumer Research 29 (3): 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cross, G. 2004. Wondrous innocence print advertising and the origins of permissive child rearing in the US. Journal of Consumer Culture 4 (2): 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, R.A. 2011. Brilliance of a fire: Innocence, experience and the theory of childhood. Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (2): 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fourcade, M., and K. Healy. 2007. Moral views of market society. Annual Review of Sociology 33: 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freeman, O. 2009. “The Coke side of life”—An exploration of pre-schoolers’ constructions of product and selves through talk-in-interaction around Coca-Cola. Young Consumers 10 (4): 314–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, O. 2012. ‘I do like them but I don’t watch them’: Preschoolers’ use of age as an accounting device in product evaluations. In Situating child consumption: Rethinking values and notions of children, ed. A Sparrman, B Sandlin and J Sjöberg, 157–175. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fuentes, M., and H. Brembeck. 2017. Best for baby? Framing weaning practice and motherhood in web-mediated marketing. Consumption Markets & Culture 20 (2): 153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gram, M. 2015. Buying food for the family: Negotiations in parent/child supermarket shopping: An observational study from Denmark and the United States. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 44 (2): 169–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halkier, B. 2010. Consumption challenged: Food in mediated everyday lives. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Halkier, B. 2013. Contesting food—Contesting motherhood? In Motherhoods, markets and consumption: The making of mothers in contemporary Western cultures, ed. S. O’Donohoe, M. Hogg, P. Maclaran, L. Martens, and L. Stevens, 87–102. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Halkier, B., T. Katz-Gero, and L. Martens. 2011. Special issue on “Applications of practice theory in consumption research.” Journal of Consumer Culture 11 (1): 3–13.Google Scholar
  21. Higonnet, A. 1998. Pictures of innocence: The history and crisis of ideal childhood. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  22. Honeyman, S. 2005. Elusive childhood: Impossible representations in modern fiction. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Karsten, L., A. Kamphuis, and C. Remeijnse. 2015. ‘Time-out’ with the family: The shaping of family leisure in the new urban consumption spaces of cafes, bars and restaurants. Leisure Studies 34 (2): 166–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keenan, J., and H. Stapleton. 2013. ‘It won’t do her any harm’ they said, ‘or they wouldn’t put it on the market’. In Motherhoods, markets and consumption: The making of mothers in contemporary Western cultures, ed. S. O’Donohoe, M. Hogg, P. Maclaran, L. Martens, and L. Stevens, 71–87. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Kenway, J., and J. Bullen. 2001. Consuming children: Education-entertainment-advertising. Michigan: Open University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kopytoff, I. 1986. The cultural biography of things: Commoditisation as process. In The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective, ed. A. Appadurai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Knorr Cetina, K.K., and U. Bruegger. 2002. Traders’ engagement with markets: A postsocial relationship. Theory, Culture & Society 19 (5–6): 161–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawler, S. 2000. Mothering the self: Mothers, daughters, subjectivities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Lindsay, J., and J. Maher. 2013. Consuming families: Buying, making, producing family life in the 21st century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Martens, L. 2005. Learning to consume—Consuming to learn: Children at the interface between consumption and education. British Journal of Sociology of Education 26 (3): 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martens, L. 2012. Practice ‘in talk’ and talk ‘as practice’: Dish washing and the reach of language. Sociological Research Online 17 (3): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martens, L., D. Southerton, and S. Scott. 2004. Bringing children (and parents) into the sociology of consumption: Towards a theoretical and empirical agenda. Journal of Consumer Culture 4 (2): 155–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martens, L., and S. Scott. 2017. Understanding everyday kitchen life: Looking at performance, into performances and for practices. In Methodological reflections on practice oriented theories, ed. M. Jonas, B. Littig, and A. Wroblewski, 177–191. Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McNamee, S., and J. Seymour. 2013. Towards a sociology of 10–12 year olds? Emerging methodological issues in the ‘new’ social studies of childhood. Childhood 12 (2): 156–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer, A. 2007. The moral rhetoric of childhood. Childhood 14 (1): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nimmo, R. 2011. Actor-network theory and methodology: Social research in a more-than-human world. Methodological Innovations Online 6 (3): 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Donohoe, S. 2006. Yummy mummies: The clamor of glamour in advertising to mothers. Advertising & Society Review 7 (3).Google Scholar
  38. Phillipson, C., R. Leach, A. Money, and S. Biggs. 2008. Social and cultural constructions of ageing: The case of the baby boomers. Sociological Research Online 13 (3): 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Plowman, L., J. McPake, and C. Stephen. 2010. The technologisation of childhood? Young children and technology in the home. Children & Society 24 (1): 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prout, A. 2005. The future of childhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Pugh, A.J. 2009. Longing and belonging: Parents, children, and consumer culture. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  42. Pyyhtinen, A. 2016. More-than-human sociology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Reckwitz, A. 2002. Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schatzki, T. 1996. Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Schatzki, T. 2002. The site of the social. A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Schatzki, T., K. Knorr-Cetina, and E. von Savigny (eds.). 2001. The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  47. Shanahan, S. 2007. Lost and found: The sociological ambivalence toward childhood. Annual Review of Sociology 33: 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shove, E. 2010. Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A 42 (6): 1273–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smart, C. 2007. Personal life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  50. Sparrman, A., and B. Sandin. 2012. Situated child consumption: Introduction. In Situating child consumption: Rethinking values and notions of children, childhood and consumption, ed. A. Sparrman, B. Sandin, and J. Sjöberg, 9–32. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.Google Scholar
  51. Taylor, A. 2010. Troubling childhood innocence: Reframing the debate over the media sexualisation of children. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood 35 (1): 48–57.Google Scholar
  52. Taylor, A. 2013. Reconfiguring the natures of childhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Thomson, R., M.J. Kehily, L. Hadfield, and S. Sharpe. 2011. Making modern mothers. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Verbeek, P.P. 2006. Materializing morality design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology and Human Values 31 (3): 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Warde, A. 1997. Consumption, food and taste: Culinary antinomies and commodity culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Warde, Alan. 2014. After taste: Culture, consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture 14 (3): 279–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Woolgar, S. (ed.). (1988). Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  58. Woolgar, S. 2012. Ontological child consumption. In Situating child consumption: Rethinking values and notions of children, childhood and consumption, ed. A. Sparrman, B. Sandin, and J. Sjöberg, 33–52. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.Google Scholar
  59. Zelizer, V.A.R. 1985. Pricing the priceless child: The changing social value of children. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  60. Zelizer, V. 2012. A grown-up priceless child. In Situating child consumption: Rethinking values and notions of children, childhood and consumption, ed. A. Sparrman, B. Sandin, and J. Sjöberg, 71–80. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Keele UniversityNewcastleUK

Personalised recommendations