Advertisement

The Two Dimensions of Ontological Citizenship: Horizontal Versus Vertical

  • Manlio CinalliEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series book series ( CAL)

Abstract

This chapter starts by analysing two main components of horizontal citizenship, understood as the access of MFCs to the French civitas. It then examines two main components of vertical citizenship, by which MFCs gain access to the French polis. In my analysis of horizontal citizenship, I will first focus on policies that promote the full equality of MFCs vis-à-vis the rest of the citizenry, and I will then determine to what extent hegemonic narratives make MFCs more strongly connected to, or detached from, the French civitas.

References

  1. Bereni, L. (2011). Le discours de la diversité en entreprise: Genèse et appropriations, (Sociologies pratiques), 23, pp. 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bleich‚ E. (2003). Race politics in Britain and France: ideas and policymaking since the 1960’s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Borillo, D., & Chappe, V. -A. (2011). La haute autorité de lutte contre les discriminations et pour l’égalité un laboratoire juridique éphémère?, (Revue française d’administration publique), 139, pp. 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burke Edmund, E. (1774). Select works of Edmund Burke, Vol. 4 (Miscellaneous Writings), http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/burke-select-works-of-edmund-burke-vol-4. Accessed January 30, 2016.
  5. Cinalli‚ M. & Sanhueza‚ M. C. (2016). Pathways of Migration: the French Case. Paper presented to the 2016 Conference on Pathways to Power, Political Studies Association, London, February 15.Google Scholar
  6. De Galambert, C. (2004). La gestionpublique de l’islam en France et en Allemagne. De l’improvisation de pratiques in situ à l’amorce d’un processus de régulationnationales, (Revue internationale et stratégique), 52, pp. 62–78.Google Scholar
  7. Doytcheva, M. (2010). Usages français de la notion de diversité: Permanence et actualité d’un débat, (Sociologie), 4, pp. 424–438.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission. (2006a). Eurobarometer 66. Public Opinion in the European Union. TNS Opinion & Social. Available on http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/eb/eb66/eb66_en.pdf.
  9. European Commission. 2006b. Special Eurobarometer: Discrimination in The European Union. TNS Sofres. Available on http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_263_en.pdf.
  10. Favell, A. (1998). Philosophies of Integration: Immigration and the Idea of Citizenship in France and Britain. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  11. Fregosi, F. (2006). Les mosquées dans la république. Quelle régulation locale du culte musulman?, (Confluence Méditerranée), 57, pp. 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lorcerie‚ F. (2008). La ‘loi sur le voile’: une entreprise politique »‚ Droit et Société‚ 68: 53–74.Google Scholar
  13. Maussen, M. (2007). Islamic Presence and Mosque Establishment in France: Colonialism, Arrangements for Guestworkers and Citizenship. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(6), 981–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Renaudie, O. (2011). La genèse complexe du Défenseur des droits, (Revue française d’administration publique), 139, pp. 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Simon, P., & Escafré-Dublet, A. (2009). Représenter la diversité en politique: Une reformulation de la dialectique et la différence de l’égalité par la doxa républicaine, (Raisons politiques), 35, p. 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zwilling, A. -L. (2012). L’architecture des mosquées en France: Construire ou édifier?, (Revue des sciences religieuses), 86(3), pp. 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CEVIPOFSciences PoParisFrance

Personalised recommendations