Skip to main content

Heroic Reading

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pedagogic Criticism
  • 217 Accesses

Abstract

Lays out the historical contexts for the rest of the book. University English is seen as arising in formative association with the extension of adult education, and as characterised by its dynamic positioning on a number of boundaries. These include the borders between institutional and extra-institutional forms of reading, and those between philological and critical studies. The signature pedagogies of literary criticism are examined as the formation of face-to-face oral communities. Literary criticism is seen as a praxis of modernist estrangement, designed to form a new and militant caste of cultural agents in opposition to an increasingly commercialised and exploitative culture. In pursuing this goal, it developed its own strategies for seriousness as a defence lest the promotion of ambiguity should lead to the erosion of stable boundaries. The boundaries felt to be at risk were not simply linguistic but include the fragile margins of ‘mature’ gendered adult identity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    One way of thinking about the rise of critical literary studies would be through placing it in the context of contemporary enquiry into group psychology. During the 1920s, Wilfred Bion worked for a while with Wilfred Trotter at University College, London, and there is a debate over how far the latter influenced the subsequent development of group relations thinking. See, for example, Robert M. Lipgar and Malcolm Pines, Building on Bion – Roots: Origins and Context of Bion’s Contributions to Theory and Practice. London: Jessica Kingsley, 2003, in particular the chapter by Nuno Torres, ‘Gregariousness and the Mind: Wilfred Trotter and Wilfred Bion’. See also Francesca Bion ‘The Days of our Lives’ http://www.psychoanalysis.org.uk/days.htm, and the second volume of Wilfred Bion’s own autobiography, All My Sins Remembered: Another Part of a Life. London: Karnac, 2009. In view of the role Denys Harding plays in Chapter 4 (below), I would note that a preoccupation with social psychology is threaded through his work from The Impulse to Dominate (1941) to Social Psychology and Individual Values (Hutchinson’s University Library, 1953).

  2. 2.

    Pierre Bourdieu, The Logic of Practice, trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Polity, 1990: 53–55.

  3. 3.

    S.T. Coleridge, The Friend (1818 edition, Vol. I), The Collected Works. London: Routledge, 1969: 20–1, 24.

  4. 4.

    Everyman. edition, edited William Greenslade, London, Dent 1997: 355. Note the parallel inauthentic form of living – the circulating library identified with the suburban limbo between city and country. See Queenie Leavis on the distinction between rural and suburban culture and idiom in (Q.D. Leavis 1932: 209–210).

  5. 5.

    See John Sutherland’s biography, Mrs Humphry Ward: Eminent Victorian, Pre-eminent Edwardian. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.

  6. 6.

    See Hilliard (2012), Chapter 5. The theme is picked up in Chapter 7, below.

  7. 7.

    (Anon.) English Literature in Schools: A List of Authors and Works for Successive Stages of Study. English Association Pamphlet No. 21. June 1912. The pamphlet also anticipates a comparative technique: ‘Older pupils will learn a valuable lesson in the art of criticism if they are able to compare the treatment of a similar theme by two different writers’ (English Literature in Schools 1912: 1).

  8. 8.

    Terence Hawkes’ essay ‘Telmah’ reprinted in That Shakespeherian Rag: Essays on a Critical Process. London: Routledge, 1986.

  9. 9.

    A detailed and wonderful contemporary survey of the history and context of adult education is contained in the 1919 Final Report of the Adult Education Committee of the Ministry of Reconstruction. Considerable attention is paid within the report to the teaching of literature. ‘The primary aim of education in literature, as far as adult students are concerned, should be not the acquisition of information but the cultivation of imagination.… The indispensable qualification of the teacher of literature…is not learning, but passion, and a power to communicate it’ (1919: 89, §160).

  10. 10.

    See Fiddian Moulton’s biographical essay on his uncle (Moulton 1926).

  11. 11.

    The Spoils of Poynton (1897), Penguin 1963: 14–15. For talking dolls in the period, see Smithsonian images: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/epic-failure-thomas-edisons-talking-doll-180955442/?no-ist.

  12. 12.

    An apposite caution appears in Medway et al.’s absorbing history of English in postwar London schools: ‘Nowhere did we find a consistency of position so well defined that it might be called a “school”: the history of how English was maintained and changed has to have regard to affiliations, friendships, sympathies, and chance influences – in short conjunctures of circumstances’ (2014: 161). I am too late to do justice to an admirable recent article by Alexander Hutton, ‘An English School for the Welfare State: Literature, Politics, and the University, 1932–1965’, English, 65(248), 2016: 3–34.

  13. 13.

    There is a very interesting commentary by Stefan Collini in ‘Richard Hoggart: Literary Criticism and Cultural Decline in Twentieth-Century Britain’, in (ed.) Sue Owen, Richard Hoggart and Cultural Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008: 36–37.

  14. 14.

    See Matthew Kibble, ‘The Betrayers of Language: Modernism and The Daily Mail’, Literature and History, 11(1), 2002: 62–80.

  15. 15.

    For the complex relations between Scrutiny and the Criterion and other magazines, see Harding (2002).

  16. 16.

    See Knights, ‘Reading as a Man’, in (eds) Mieszkowski et al. 2006; cf. Andreas Huyssen, After the Great Divide: Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodernism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986; Kate Flint, The Woman Reader 1837–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

  17. 17.

    A useful survey can be found in Joseph Bristow, Effeminate England: Homoerotic Writing After 1885. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995.

Bibliography

  • Baldick, Chris. The Social Mission of English Criticism 1848–1932. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Michael. F.R. Leavis. London: Routledge. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantlinger, Patrick. The Reading Lesson: The Threat of Mass Literacy in Nineteenth-century British Fiction. Bloomington: University of Indiana University Press. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle, Thomas. ‘Historic Survey of German Poetry’ (1831) in Complete Works Vol. 15. New York: Collier. 1897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collini, Stefan. Absent Minds: Intellectuals in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Churton. The Study of English Literature: A Plea for its Recognition and Organization at the Universities. London: Macmillan. 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Gordon. ‘The Great Reviews (I)’. Scrutiny 6.1. 1937a: 2–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. ‘The Great Reviews (II)’. Scrutiny 6.2. 1937b: 155–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Brian. English and Englishness. London: Routledge. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • During, Simon. ‘Literature: Nationalism’s Other? The Case for Revision’. In (ed.) Homi K. Bhabha. Nation and Narration. London: Routledge. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, David. Memoirs of a Leavisite. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Colin. Developing University English Teaching: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Humanities Teaching at University Level. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, Kate. The Woman Reader 1837–1914. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Jason. The Criterion: Cultural Politics and Periodical Networks in Inter-war Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilliard, Christopher. English as a Vocation: The Scrutiny Movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Ian. Culture and Government: The Emergence of Literary Education. Basingstoke: Macmillan. 1988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, Henry. The Spoils of Poynton (1897). Harmondsworth: Penguin. 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, Ben (ed.) Masculinities in Text and Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Idea of the Clerisy in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, L.C. ‘Will the Training Colleges Bear Scrutiny?’ Scrutiny 1(3). 1932: 247–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, D.H. ‘Morality and the Novel’. The Calendar of Modern Letters. 2(10): 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, W. Gordon (ed.) Exploring Individual and Organizational Boundaries: A Tavistock Open Systems Approach. London: Wiley. 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrie, Alexandra. The Beginnings of University English: Extramural Study 1885 – 1910. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leavis, F.R. Education and the University: A Sketch for an ‘English School’. London: Chatto and Windus. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. How to Teach Reading: A Primer for Ezra Pound. Cambridge: Minority Press. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. New Bearings in English Poetry: A Study of the Contemporary Situation. London: Chatto and Windus. 1932a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavis, F.R., and Denys Thompson. Culture and Environment: The Training of Critical Awareness. London: Chatto and Windus. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavis, Q.D. (Ed. Ghanshyam Singh) Collected Essays. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1983–1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Fiction and the Reading Public. London: Chatto and Windus. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Vernon. [Violet Paget] The Handling of Words. London: Bodley Head. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medway, Peter, John Hardcastle, Georgina Brewis, and David Crook. English Teachers in a Postwar Democracy: Emerging Choice in London Schools 1945–1965. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Reconstruction, Adult Education Committee. Final Report. His Majesty’s Stationery Office. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Joe. ‘F.R. Leavis, English and the University’. English. 51. 2002: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, R.G. The Modern Study of Literature: An Introduction to Literary Theory and Interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Moral System of Shakespeare: A Popular Illustration of Fiction as the Experimental Side of Philosophy. New York: Macmillan. 1903.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The University Extension Movement. Introduction by James Stuart. London: Bemrose. Reprinted 1887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, W. Fiddian Richard Green Moulton: A Memoir. London: Epworth Press. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhern, Francis. The Moment of ‘Scrutiny’. London: New Left Books. 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Newbolt, Henry] The Teaching of English in England. Being the Report of the Departmental Committee Appointed by the President of the Board of Education to Inquire into the Position of English in the Educational System of England. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office. 1921, 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newlyn, Lucy. Reading, Writing, and Romanticism: The Anxiety of Reception. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ponsonby, Arthur. Falsehood in War-Time. London: George Allen and Unwin. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, H. Edmund. The Teaching of Literature in the WEA with Special Reference to the Tutorial Class. Life and Leisure Pamphlets No. 8. London: British Institute of Adult Education. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiller-Couch, Arthur, Sir. On the Art of Writing. New York: Putnam. 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, Lawrence. Institutions of Modernism: Literary Elites and Public Culture. New Haven CT: Yale University Press. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, I.A. Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgment. [1929]. London: Routledge. 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Principles of Literary Criticism. [1924]. London: Routledge. 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, Bruce. Secular Vocations: Intellectuals, Professionalism, Culture. London: Verso. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Jonathan. The Intellectual Life of the British Working Classes. New Haven CT: Yale University Press. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, Tom. The Emergence of Cultural Studies: Adult Education, Cultural Politics, and the ‘English’ Question. London: Lawrence and Wishart. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Denys. Reading and Discrimination. London: Chatto and Windus. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, David. Paranoid Modernism: Literary Experiment, Psychosis, and the Professionalization of English Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, Wilfred. Instincts of the Herd in Peace and War. [1916]. London: Fisher Unwin. Second edition 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, Gauri. Masks of Conquest: Literary Study and British Rule in India. New York: Columbia University Press. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Allon. Carnival, Hysteria and Writing. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, Virginia. To the Lighthouse. [1927] London: Vintage. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knights, B. (2017). Heroic Reading. In: Pedagogic Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-27813-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics