Advertisement

This Is Not … a Pipe: On the Complexity of Experience

  • Paul Stenner
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Psychosocial book series (STIP)

Abstract

This chapter follows Chap. 3 in being structured around the contemplation of an art object from which a number of theoretical distinctions, and indeed the makings of an ontology, are unfurled. In this case the art object is René Magritte’s well-known painting called Ceci n’est pas une pipe. The stable visible form of the painting captures felt insights for a theory of experience richer than that typically considered by social scientists. Usually (outside of psychology and neuroscience) experience is treated in a rather one-dimensional way that is informed by a long-standing bifurcation of nature into a physical world of pure meaningless matter and a mental world of pure matterless meaning. On this assumption, experience is falsely equated with the conscious experience of adult humans, and the more primordial modes of experience at large throughout nature are ignored. This black and white picture in which object and subject of experience are cleaved apart gives rise to a shallow empiricism which grossly distorts our knowledge. An alternative deep empiricism is proposed.

References

  1. Araújo, A. (2014). William James and Jakob von Uexküll: Pragmatism, pluralism and the outline of a philosophy of organism. Cognitio-Estudos – Revista Electrônica de Filosofia/ Philosophy Electronic Journal, São Paulo, 11(2), 146–156.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, S., & Stenner, P. (2009). Psychology without foundations: History, philosophy and psychosocial theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Dilthey, W. (1883/1989). Introduction to the human sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Foucault, M. (1983). This is not a pipe. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Galilei, G. (1623/1960). The Assayer (Il Saggiatore), in The controversy of the comets of 1618 (S. Drake, Trans.). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  7. Halewood, M. (2011). A.N. Whitehead and social theory: Tracing a culture of thought. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  8. Husserl, E. (1974). Experience and judgment. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  9. James, W. (1890/1950). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  10. James, W. (1911). Some problems of philosophy. London: Longmans Green and Co.Google Scholar
  11. James, W. (1912/2003). Essays in radical empiricism. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  12. Levine, J. (1983). Materialism and qualia: The explanatory gap. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64, 354–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Manzotti, R. (2006). Consciousness and existence as a process. Mind & Matter, 4(1), 7–43.Google Scholar
  14. Newton, I. (1687/1999). The principia: Mathematical principles of natural philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Peirce, C. S. (1998). In Peirce edition Project (Ed.), The essential peirce (Vol. 2). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Salvatore, S. (2015). Psychology in black and white: The project of a theory-driven science. England: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Salvatore, S., & Venuleo, C. (2017). Liminal transitions in a semiotic key: The mutual in-feeding between present and past. Theory and Psychology, 27(2), 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Serres, M. (1982). The parasite. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
  19. Stenner, P. (2005). An outline of an autopoietic systems approach to emotion. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 12(4), 8–22.Google Scholar
  20. Stenner, P. (2008). A.N. Whitehead and subjectivity. Subjectivity, 22(1), 90–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stenner, P. (2011). James and Whitehead: Assemblage and systematization of a deeply empiricist mosaic philosophy. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 3(1), 101–130. http://lnx.journalofpragmatism.eu/
  22. Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Throop, C. J. (2002). Experience, coherence and culture: The significance of Dilthey’s ‘Descriptive Psychology’ for the anthropology of consciousness. Anthropology of Consciousness, 13(1), 2–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Whitehead, A. N. (1926/1985). Science and the Modern World. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  25. Whitehead, A. N. (1927/1985). Symbolism: Its meaning and effect. Virginia: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  26. Whitehead, A. N. (1929/1985). Process and reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Stenner
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations