This Is Not … The Truth: On Fabulation

  • Paul Stenner
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Psychosocial book series (STIP)

Abstract

This chapter examines a phenomenon that is largely ignored in contemporary literature: fabulation. Fabulation is closely related to imagination, which in turn is classically distinguished from perception (where we are assumed to perceive a reality that is co-present) and memory (where a reality which did exist has now passed). In contrast to memory and perception, imagination conjures a ‘fabulous’ reality which need neither exist nor have existed. Fabulation is the name given to this process of invention that is implied within imagination. This chapter makes the case that fabulation involves far more than presenting an inadequate or distorted representation of reality. It rethinks fabulation as a symbolic means through which human beings gain imaginative access to a world in process of constant construction and reconstruction. Understood as a means of conveying insight into unspoken depths of changing social experience, fabulation is revealed to be crucial to human creativity and hence to the actual emergence of novelty.

References

  1. Artaud, A. (1964/1974). The theatre and its double. Collected works: Volume 4. London: John Calder.Google Scholar
  2. Bergson, H. (1932/1986). The two sources of morality and religion (R. Ashley Audra & C. Brereton, Trans.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bogue, R. (2006). Fabulation narration and the people to come. In C. V. Boundas (Ed.), Deleuze and philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bogue, R. (2010). Deleuzian fabulation and the scars of history. Brown and Reavey, memory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, S. D., & Reavey, P. (2015). Vital memory and affect: Living with a difficult past. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, S. D., & Stenner, P. (2009). Psychology without foundations: History, philosophy and psychosocial theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Deleuze, G. (1986). Cinema 1: The movement-image. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Deleuze, G. (1998). Essays critical and clinical (D. W. Smith & M. A. Greco, Trans.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dilthey, W. (1883/1989). Introduction to the human sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DiMaggio, Paul.Google Scholar
  12. Durkheim, E. (1912/1995). In K. Fields (Ed.), The elementary forms of religious life. London: Allen.Google Scholar
  13. Harrison, J. (1908). Prolegomena to the study of Greek religion (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hesiod, & Caldwell, R. S. (1987). Hesiod’s theogony. Cambridge, MA: Focus Information Group.Google Scholar
  15. Kaag, J. (2009). The neurological dynamics of the imagination. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Langer, S. (1978). Philosophy in a new key: A study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. LeDoux, J. E. (1995). In search of an emotion system in the brain: Leaping from fear to emotion and consciousness. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1049–1061). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Motzkau, J. F. (2007). Matters of suggestibility, memory and time: Child witnesses in Court and what really happened. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 8(1), Art. 14. Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-07/07-1-14-e.htm. Last Accessed 2 Aug 2017.
  19. Piaget, J. (1928/1972). Judgement and reasoning in the child (M. Warden, Trans.). Littlefield: Adams.Google Scholar
  20. Plato, & Grube, G. M. A. (1977). Plato’s Phaedo. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  21. Stenner, P., & Moreno, E. (2013). Liminality and affectivity: The case of deceased organ donation. Subjectivity, 6(3), 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Szakolczai, Á. (2009). Liminality and experience: Structuring transitory situations and transformative events. International Political Anthropology, 2(1), 141–172.Google Scholar
  23. Thomassen, B. (2014). Liminality and the modern. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Throop, C. J. (2002). Experience, coherence, and culture: The significance of Dilthey’s ‘descriptive psychology’ for the anthropology of consciousness. Anthropology of Consciousness, 13(1), 2–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  26. Van Gennep, A. (1961 [1909]). The rites of passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Whitehead, A. N. (1938/1966). Modes of thought. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Stenner
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations