Skip to main content

Securitization and Desecuritization of Minority Rights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 403 Accesses

Abstract

Where minority rights are primarily framed as having strong implications for state security, they are securitized. When they are instead discussed in reference to other values (such as democracy or human rights), and when societal actors representing other than security interests dominate their contestation, they are desecuritized. This chapter provides an overview of how Turkey has dealt with its (religious) minorities. It reveals a background of strong securitization of minority rights emerging from the last decades of the Ottoman Empire and the beginnings of the Turkish Republic. It then shows how EU accession negotiations have provided an impetus toward a desecuritization process already begun in the 1980s, which however remains incomplete and far from irreversible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Akçam, T. (1996). Armenien und der Völkermord : Die Istanbuler Prozesse und die türkische Nationalbewegung. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aktar, A. (2000). Varlık Vergisi ve Türkleştirme Politikaları [The Wealth Tax and Turkification Policies]. Ankara: İletişim Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aktaş, P. (2004, June 8). Rüyalarımız bile Türkçe. Milliyet (online). www.milliyet.com.tr/2004/06/08/guncel/agun.html. Accessed 20 Jul 2016.

  • Andrews, P. A. (1989). Ethnic groups in the Republic of Turkey. Wiesbaden: Reichert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avcı, G. (2003). Turkey’s slow EU candidacy: Insurmountable hurdles to membership or simple Euro-scepticism? Turkish Studies, 4(1), 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydınlı, E. (2004). The Turkish pendulum between globalization and security: From the late Ottoman Era to the 1930s. Middle Eastern Studies, 40(3), 102–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balzacq, T. (2009). Constructivism and Securitization Studies. In M. Dunn Cavelty & V. Mauer (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of security studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianet. (2012, August 31). Malları Bulmak da Kanıtlamak da Zor [Finding and Proving the Properties are both difficult]. Bianet. http://www.bianet.org/bianet/azinliklar/140621-mallari-bulmak-da-kanitlamak-da-zor. Accessed 25 Sept 2014.

  • Bigo, D. (1996). Polices en réseaux: l’expérience éuropéenne. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2002). Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives, 27, 63–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2005). La mondialisation de l’(in)sécurité? Réflexions sur le champ des professionels de la gestion des inquiétudes et analytique de la transnationalisation des processus d’(in)sécurisation. Cultures et conflits, 58, 53–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2006a). Liberty, whose Liberty? The Haque Programme and the Conception of Freedom. In T. Balzacq & S. Carrera (Eds.), Security vs freedom? A challenge for Europe’s future (pp. 35–44). London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2006b). Globalized (In)security: The Field and the Ban-opticon. In D. Bigo & A. Tsoukala (Eds.), Illiberal practices of liberal regimes: The (in)security games (pp. 5–49). Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2006c). Global (in)security: The field of the professionals of unease management and the Ban-opticon. In J. Solomon & N. Sakai (Eds.), Traces: A multilingual series of cultural theory (pp. 109–157). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D., Carrera, S., & Guild, E. (2009). The CHALLENGE Project: Final Recommendations on the Changing Landscape of European Liberty and Security. Challenge Liberty & Security. (Research Paper No. 16). Available from ceps.eu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B. (2006). Will the “global war on terrorism” be the New Cold War? International Affairs, 82(6), 1101–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., Waever, O., & De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebeci, M. (2007). Democratization as Desecuritization: The Case of Turkey, ECPR SGIR Turin Conference, 31 August 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cizre, Ü. (2003). Demythologizing the national security concept. Middle East Journal, 57(2), 213–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çağlar, G. (2000). Staat und Zivilgesellschaft in der Türkei und im Osmanischen Reich. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wilde, J. H. (2008). Environmental Security Deconstructed. In H. G. Brauch et al. (Eds.), Globalisation and environmental challenges: Reconceptualizing security in the 21st century (pp. 595–602). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T., Stetter, S., & Albert, M. (2006). The European Union and border conflicts: The transformative power of integration. International Organization, 60(3), 563–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan, B. (2006, September 21–23). Compliance with EU Democratic Conditionality: Turkey and the Political Criteria of EU. ECPR Standing Group on the European Union, 3rd Pan-European Conference on EU Politics, Istanbul.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council. (2004). The Presidency Conclusions of the European Council meeting on December 16–17, 2004. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/83201.pdf.

  • General Assembly. (1974). Decision of the General Assembly for Civil Matters. Substance no: 1971/2-820, numbered 1974/505, dated 08.05.1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesel, C. (2013). Facetten von Multiethnizität und Multireligiosität in der Türkei: Historische Entwicklungslinien und aktuelle Bedingungen im Rahmen politisch-gesellschaftlicher Transformationen. In O. Leisse (Ed.), Die Türkei im Wandel – Innen-und außenpolitische Dynamiken. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesel, C. (2014a) Identität und Sprachgebrauch der slawophonen bosniakischen Auswanderer in Istanbul. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Jena University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesel, C. (2014b). Status and situation of the Jews in Turkey: Historical lines of development and contemporary circumstances in the context of socio-political transformations. Elektronik Siyaset Bilimi Araştırmaları Dergisi/Electronic Journal of Political Science Studies, 5(2), 1–32. Accessed 1 Aug 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesel, C. (2015a). Genese und Erosion des ethnopolitischen Homogenisierungsdogmas sowie offene Entfaltungsmöglichkeiten ethnischer Gruppen im Rahmen politisch-gesellschaftlicher Liberalisierungsansätze in der Türkei im 20. Jh. (Teil 1: 1919-1980). Elektronik Siyaset Bilimi Araştırmaları Dergisi/Electronic Journal of Political Science Studies, 6(2), 1–44. www.esbadergisi.com/images/sayi11/aufsatz_giesel_esba_1_teil_2015.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesel, C. (2015b). Status and Situation of the Jews in Turkey: Historical Lines of Development and Contemporary Circumstances in the Context of Socio-political Transformations. In R. N. Bali & L.-O. Mallet (Eds.), Turkish Jews in Contemporary Turkey (2nd ed., pp. 23–81). Istanbul: Libra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesel, C. (2016a). Die muslimischen Georgier in der Türkei zwischen Assimilation und „ethnic revival“ – ein allgemeiner Überblick. In N. Reineck & U. Rieger (Eds.), Kaukasiologie heute: Festschrift für Prof. Heinz Fähnrich (pp. 111–154). König: Greiz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesel, C. (2016b). Erosion des ethnopolitischen Homogenisierungsdogmas sowie offene Entfaltungsmöglichkeiten ethnischer Gruppen im Rahmen politisch-gesellschaftlicher Liberalisierungsansätze in der Türkei im 20. Jh. (Teil 2: 1980-1999). Elektronik Siyaset Bilimi Araştırmaları Dergisi/Electronic Journal of Political Science Studies, 7(2), 1–52. www.esbadergisi.com/images/sayi13/christoph_giesel_esba_2_teil_2016.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesel, C. (2016c). The Erosion of the Kemalist Dogma of Ethno-Political Homogeneity in the Context of Partial Socio-political Liberalisation Processes in Turkey in the Second Half of the 20th Century. In A. Freyberg-Inan et al. (Eds.), Growing together, growing apart: Turkey and the European Union today (pp. 73–99). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giesel, C. (2016d). The Bosniaks in Turkey between Assimilation and Ethnic Revival – Developments of Historical, Social and Political Conditions, Experiences and Attitudes Since the Migration From the Balkans Until Today. In T. Kahl & I. Nechiţi (Eds.), Ethnic and linguistic diversity in Southeast Europe and the Caucasus. Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesel, C. (2016e). Jezičke karakteristike i sociolingvistički stavovi kod iseljenih Bošnjaka Sandžačkog porijekla u Istanbulu (Turska). In A. Kalajdžija (Ed.), Zbornik radova Drugog simpozija o bosanskom jeziku (12–13 mart 2015): Istraživanje, normiranje i učenje bosanskoga jezika – dosadašnji rezultati, potrebe i perspektive. Sarajevo: Insitut za Jezik. (pp. 563–601)

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesel, C. (2017). Ethnizität der Türkei-Bosniaken in Istanbul: Soziale Erfahrungen, Identitäten, Attitüden und Sprachgebrauch. Leipzig: Biblion Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göle, N. (1993). Liberal yanılgı. Türkiye Günlüğü, 24, 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigoriadis, I. N. (2008). On the Europeanization of minority rights protection: Comparing the cases of Greece and Turkey. Mediterranean Politics, 13(1), 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guild, E. (2009). Security and migration in the 21st century. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guild, E., & Carrera, S. (2009). Towards the Next Phase of the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: The European Commission’s Proposals for the Stockholm Programme (CEPS Policy Brief No. 196). Available at ceps.eu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guild, E., Carrera, S., & Atger, A. F. (2009). Challenges and Prospects for the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: Recommendations to the European Commission for the Stockholm Programme (CEPS Working Document No. 313). Available at ceps.eu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güven, D. (2012). Nationalismus und Minderheiten: Die Ausschreitungen gegen die Christen und Juden der Türkei vom September 1955. München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, J. (2000). The European Union and the securitization of migration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(5), 751–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, J. (2006). The Politics of Insecurity Fear: migration and asylum in the EU. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • İnsel, A. (2013, October 1). Temel haklarda azla kifayet meziyet midir? [Is it an ability to be satisfied with little regarding basic rights?]. Radikal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakaya Polat, R. (2008, April 1–3). The European Union as a Desecuritizer: Securitization and Desecuritization of Turkey’s Kurdish Question. 58th Political Studies Association Annual Conference, Democracy, Governance and Conflict: Dilemmas of Theory and Practice. Swansea University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakya Polat, R. (2009). The 2007 parliamentary elections in Turkey: Between securitisation and desecuritisation. Parliamentary Affairs, 62(1), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, A. (2004). Political participation strategies of the Circassian Diaspora in Turkey. Mediterranean Politics, 9(2), 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirişçi, K. (2011). The Kurdish issue in Turkey: Limits of European Union reform. South European Society and Politics, 16(2), 335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutcharian, G. (1989). Der Siedlungsraum der Armenier unter dem Einfluss der historisch-politischen Ereignisse seit dem Berliner Kongress 1878 Eine politisch-geographische Analyse und Dokumentation. Berlin: Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiser, K., & Neumann, C. K. (2003). Kleine Geschichte der Türkei. Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küçükşahin, Ş. (2004, February 23). Gizli Genelgeyle Azınlık Devrimi [Minority Revolution with a Secret Memorandum]. Hürriyet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurban, D., & Hatemi, K. (2009). The Story of an Alienation: Real Estate Ownership Problems of Non-Muslim Foundations and Communities in Turkey. Istanbul: TESEV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matuz, J. (1996). Das Osmanische Reich: Grundlinien seiner Geschichte. Darmstadt: Primus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Gazette No. 24841. (2002, August 9) Article 4, Law No. 4771 Amending Various Laws, August 3, 2002, Official Gazette No. 24841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Gazette No. 24990 (2003, January 11) Law No. 4778 Amending Various Laws, January 2, 2003, Official Gazette No. 24990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Gazette No. 25003 (2003, January 24) Regulation on Acquisition and Disposal of Immovables by Non-Muslim Foundations and Registration of Immovables in their Possession to their Names, Official Gazette No. 25003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Gazette No. 25173 (2003, July 19) Law Amending Various Laws, No: 4928, July 15, 2003, Official Gazette No: 25173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Gazette No. 26800 (2008, February 27) Law on Foundations, No. 5737, February 20, 2008, Official Gazette No. 26800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Gazette No. 28071 (2011, October 1) Regulation on the Implementation of the Article 11 of the Law on Foundations No. 5737, Official Gazette No. 28071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onar, N. F., & Özgüneş, M. (2010). How deep a transformation? Europeanization of Greek and Turkish minority policies. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 17(1), 111–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ökte, F. (n.d.) Varlık Vergisi Faciası [The Wealth Tax Disaster]. Istanbul: Nebioğlu Yayınevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özel, S. (2008). Turkey: The year of living dangerously. The International Spectator, 43(1), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radikal (2008b, May 1) TCK 301 Nihayet Değişti [TPC 301 Has Finally Changed]. Radikal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumpf, C. (1993). Minderheiten in der Türkei und die Frage nach ihrem rechtlichen Schutz. Zeitschrift für Türkeistudien, 2, 173–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saymaz, İ. (2004, June 8). Boşnaklar sitemkâr. Radikal (online). www.radikal.com.tr/haber.php?haberno=118774. Accessed 10 Oct 2010.

  • Scherrer, C. P. (1997). Mehrheiten versus Minderheiten. Zur Kritik erklärungsbedürftiger Konzepte. Wissenschaft und Frieden, 1. www.wissenschaft-und-frieden.de/seite.php?artikelID=1200.

  • Schmitt, C. (1996 [1932]). The Concept of the Political. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soner, B. A. (2010). The justice and development party’s policies towards non-Muslim minorities in Turkey. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 12(1), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieger, C. (2009, December 15). Gefährdete Identität der Aramäer im Tur Abdin: Die syrisch-orthodoxe Minderheit im Südosten der Türkei kämpft um die Erhaltung ihrer Sprache. Neue Zürcher Zeitung (online). www.nzz.ch/aktuell/startseite/gefaehrdete-identitaet-der-aramaeer-im-tur-abdin-1.4196339. Accessed 20 Jul 2016.

  • Şener, C. (2004). Türkiye’de yaşan etnik ve dinsel gruplar. Istanbul: Etik Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Gruppenkonflikt und Vorurteil. Entstehung und Funktion sozialer Stereotypen. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ternon, Y. (1996). Der verbrecherische Staat: Völkermord im 20. Jahrhundert. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunçay, M. (1983). Azınlıklar Nüfusu. Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türkiye Ansikopedisi 6. Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villelabeitia, I. (2009, January 21). Christian monastery in Turkey fights to keep land. Reuters (online). www.reuters.com/article/us-religion-turkey-christians-idUSTRE50L08720090122. Accessed 1 Aug 2016.

  • Waever, O. (1995). Securitisation and Desecuritisation. In R. D. Lipschutz (Ed.), On Security. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waever, O. (2000). The EU as a security actor: reflections from a pessimistic constructivist on post-sovereign security orders. In M. Kelstrup & M. C. Williams (Eds.), International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration (pp. 250–294). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. C. (2003). Words, images, enemies: Securitization and international politics. International Studies Quarterly, 47(4), 511–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZfT (Zentrum für Türkeistudien). (1998). Das ethnische und religiöse Mosaik der Türkei und seine Reflexionen auf Deutschland. Münster: LIT-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bardakci, M., Freyberg-Inan, A., Giesel, C., Leisse, O. (2017). Securitization and Desecuritization of Minority Rights. In: Religious Minorities in Turkey. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-27026-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics