Skip to main content
  • 517 Accesses

Abstract

Our study has explored how data on the social connections between people, insofar as they are linked to occupations, can shed light upon patterns of consequential social inequalities. There are many different ways of measuring and understanding long-term social inequalities, but we argued that the best understanding of all comes from a characterisation of social positions through empirical data on the social interaction patterns exhibited between detailed occupational categories. Specifically, in Chaps. 4, 5, and 6 we described in depth the ‘CAMSIS’ approach to constructing ‘Social Interaction Distance’ scales for occupations. We demonstrated how CAMSIS scales—that should be interpreted as measures of the average position in the stratification structure held by the incumbents of an occupation—provide useful, arguably optimal, measures of social stratification. The construction of CAMSIS scales raise complex issues, and results can be contingent upon low-level decisions made during the scale construction process, but these challenges are surmountable and they should not put us off from exploring and exploiting a very promising tool for understanding the social structure. The CAMSIS approach has been around for many decades, but the use of SID scales for occupations has recently enjoyed an upsurge in popularity, and this text incorporates some extended reference materials for people interested in the approach, and advice on the interpretation and exploitation of CAMSIS scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Atkinson, W. (2017). Class in the New Millennium: The Structure, Homologies and Experience of the British Social Space. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, S. D. (1988). Markets and Market-Areas: Some Preliminary Formulations. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach (pp. 261–303). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingley, P., Corak, M., & Westergard-Nielsen, N. (2012). Equality of Opportunity and Intergenerational Transmission of Employers. In J. Ermisch, M. Jantti, & T. Smeeding (Eds.), From Parents to Children: The Intergenerational Transmission of Advantage (pp. 441–460). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorman, S. A., & White, H. C. (1976). Social Structure from Multiple Networks: Part II. Role Interlock. American Journal of Sociology, 81(6), 1384–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynin, M., & Guveli, A. (2012). Understanding the Ethnic Pay Gap in Britain. Work, Employment and Society, 26(4), 574–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M., & Grusky, D. B. (2004). Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coxon, A. P. M., & Jones, C. L. (1978). The Images of Occupational Prestige: A Study in Social Cognition. London: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, F. (2004). Class Practices: How Parents Help Their Children Get Good Jobs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dorling, D. (2010). Injustice: Why Social Inequality Persists. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ermisch, J., Francesconi, M., & Siedler, T. (2006). Intergenerational Mobility and Marital Sorting. The Economic Journal, 116, 659–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermisch, J., Jantti, M., & Smeeding, T. (Eds.). (2012). From Parents to Children: The Intergenerational Transmission of Advantage. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, S. (2014). The Price of the Ticket: Rethinking the Experience of Social Mobility. Sociology, 48(2), 352–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhse, J. (2009). The Meaning Structure of Social Networks. Sociological Theory, 27(1), 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goblot, E. (1961). Class and Occupation. In T. Parsons (Ed.), Theories of Society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J. H. (2010). Analysing Social Inequality: A Critique of Two Recent Contributions from Economics and Epidemiology. European Sociological Review, 26(6), 731–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, D., & Lambert, P. S. (2012). Dimensions and Boundaries: Comparative Analysis of Occupational Structures Using Social Network and Social Interaction Distance Analysis. Sociological Research Online, 17(2), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, C. (2000). Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century—Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. F. (1981). Book Review: Social Stratification and Occupations. Sociology, 15(4), 620–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O. (2011). Chavs—The Demonisation of the Working Class. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D. (2012). Economic Networks. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurison, D., & Friedman, S. (2016). The Class Pay Gap in Higher Professional and Managerial Occupations. American Sociological Reivew, 81(4), 668–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (1999). Social Networks and Status Attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 467–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, L. (2015). Getting By: Estates, Class and Culture in Austerity Britain. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mercklé, P. (2012). Who Is Responsible for the Disappearance of Social Classes? Bulletin de Methodologie Socilogique, 116(1), 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packard, V. (1959). The Status Seekers. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, G. (2017). The New Social Mobility: How the Politicians Got it Wrong. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P. (2010). Social Mobility Myths. London: CIVITAS: Institute for the Study of Civil Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, M., Cunningham, N., Devine, F., Friedman, S., Laurison, D., McKenzie, L., Miles, A., Snee, H., & Wakeling, P. (2015). Social Class in the 21st Century. London: Pelican Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, M., Devine, F., Cunningham, N., Taylor, M., Li, Y., Hjellbrekke, J., Le Roux, B., Friedman, S., & Miles, A. (2013). A New Model of Social Class: Findings from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey Experiment. Sociology, 47(2), 219–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift, A. (2004). Would Perfect Mobility be Perfect? European Sociological Review, 20(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldinger, R., & Lichter, M. I. (2003). How the Other Half Works: Immigration and the Social Organization of Labor. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (1958). The Rise of the Meritocracy 1870–2033. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lambert, P., Griffiths, D. (2018). Conclusions. In: Social Inequalities and Occupational Stratification. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-02253-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-02253-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-02252-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02253-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics