Advertisement

Introduction: Unknotting Tangled Lines in the South China Sea Dispute

  • Jing Huang
  • Sharinee Jagtiani

Abstract

With a constant resurgence of tensions over territorial disputes in the South China Sea, the prospects of developing an effective and long-term “solution” to the issue are becoming increasingly challenging. The dispute exists within a complex web composed of claims of historical sovereignty, legal ambiguities, and a relatively constrained Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Most importantly, Southeast Asian regional security hinges on the geopolitical climax of two major powers, the United States and China, both seeking to establish a primary and lasting presence in the region. While the shadow of external actors weighs heavily over choices and decisions of Southeast Asian countries, leaders in claimant countries have used sovereignty disputes as rallying points to solidify the legitimacy to govern their own people. As a result, the disputes now involve an irreversible nationalistic sentiment that leaders themselves might find challenging to dismiss when it comes to making compromises while negotiating solutions.

Keywords

Democratic Progressive Party Domestic Politics Energy Information Administration Energy Information Administration Spratly Island 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chao, Z. (1987). On the Ban of Maritime Trade of the Ming Dynasty. Journal of Shandong University, 2, 120–127.Google Scholar
  2. EIA (Energy Information Administration). (7 February, 2013). South China Sea. Retrieved 5 March 2014, from Analysis Briefs: http://www.eia.gov/countries/regions-topics.cfm?fips=SCS.Google Scholar
  3. Elleman, B. A. (2011). China’s 1974 Naval Expedition to the Paracel Islands. In B. A. Paine (ed.), Naval Power and Expeditionary Wars: Peripheral Campaigns and New Theatres of Naval Warfare (pp. 141–150). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation). (n.d.). Women in Agriculture, Environment and Rural Production. Retrieved February 2014, from Food and Agriculture Organisation: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/008/ae946e/ae946e00.pdf.Google Scholar
  5. Franckx, E., & Benatar, M. (2011). Dotted Lines in the South China Sea: Fishing for (Legal) Clarity. In T. T. Thuy (ed.), The South China Sea: Towards a Region of Peace, Security and Cooperation (pp. 210–232). Hanoi: The Gioi Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Gallardo, S. M., & Baviera, A. S. (2012). Filipino Media and Public Opinion on the Philippines — China Disputes in the South China Sea: A Preliminary Analysis. Paper presented at the 4th International Workshop on “The South China Sea: Cooperation for Regional Security and Development,” organized by the Diplomatic Academy of the Vietnam and the Vietnam Lawyers’ Association, 18–21 November.Google Scholar
  7. Gregor, A. J. (1989). In the Shadow of Giants: The Major Powers and the Security of Southeast Asia. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
  8. ICG (International Crisis Group). (2012). Stirring up the South China Sea (I). Beijing/Brussels: International Crisis Group.Google Scholar
  9. Joyner, C. C. (1999). The Spratly Islands Dispute in the South China Sea: Problems, Policies, and Prospects for Diplomatic. In R. K. Singh (ed.), Investigating Confidence-Building Measures in the Asia-Pacific Region (pp. 53–108). Washington, DC: Stimson Center.Google Scholar
  10. Lucio Blanco Pitlo III. (24 July 2013). Fishing Wars: Competition for South China Sea’s Resources. Retrieved 25 February, 2014, from Pacific Forum CSIS, Honolulu, Hawaii: https://csis.org/files/publication/Pac1357.pdf.Google Scholar
  11. Ministry of Fisheries and the World Bank. (16 February 2005). Vietnam: Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector Study — Final Report. Retrieved 25 February 2014, from World Bank: Openk Knowledge Repository: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/8533/316950VN0white11official0use0only10.pdf?sequence=1.Google Scholar
  12. Patalano, A. (2013). Sea Power, Maritime Disputes, and the Evolving Security of the East and South China Seas. The RUSI Journal, 158(6), 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Storey, I., & Schofield, C. (November 2009). The South China Sea Dispute: Rising Tensions, Increasing Stakes. Retrieved 25 February 2014, from Academia.edu: https://www.academia.edu/2062121/The_South_China_Sea_Dispute_Rising_Tensions_Increasing_Stakes.Google Scholar
  14. Thang, N.-D., & Tao, N. H. (2012). China’s Nine-Dotted Lines in the South China Sea: The 2011 Exchange of Diplomatic Notes. Ocean Development & International Law, 43(1), 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Till, G. (2008). The South China Sea dispute: An International History. In R. E. Sam Bateman (ed.), Security and International Politics in the South China Sea: Towards a Co-Operative Management Regime (pp. 26–41). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Till, G. (2013). Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty-First Century. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Tonnesson, S. (2002). The History of the Dispute. In T. Kivimäki (ed.), War Or Peace in the South China Sea? (pp. 6–23). Copenhagen: NAIS Press.Google Scholar
  18. Xinhua. (21 June 2013). China, Vietnam Ink Agreement on Fishery Hotline. Retrieved 25 February 2014, from Xinhua: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013–06/21/c_132475771.htm.Google Scholar
  19. Yahuda, M. (2012). China’s Recent Relations with Maritime Neighbours. The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, 47(2), 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jing Huang and Sharinee Jagtiani 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jing Huang
  • Sharinee Jagtiani

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations