Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Kingsley Edney
Part of the Asia Today book series (ASIAT)

Abstract

The use of propaganda practices is deeply embedded in the Chinese political system and is a key aspect of how the Party-state exercises power in contemporary domestic politics. In one sense this is visible in the way that the political bodies linked to the central propaganda authorities form a vast network of institutions that operate at all levels of the political system, from the elite central leadership down to the level of village and neighborhood organizations, and control all areas of public discourse. In terms of the practical exercise of power, however, we can also see that propaganda practices have remained an integral component of the Party-state’s day-to-day repertoire of governance techniques, despite changes to the context in which it implements such techniques. As the communicative and technological aspects of globalization have challenged the Party-state’s ability to control public discourse in China, the Party-state has not given up on its use of propaganda practices but has instead adapted them to ensure their continuing utility. Thus far it has been remarkably successful at achieving this objective, although the task is ongoing and requires significant attention and resources.

Keywords

Soft Power Official Discourse Political Cohesion Chinese Political System Transnational Civil Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Anne-Marie Brady, Making the Foreign Serve China: Managing Foreigners in the People’s Republic (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003), 98–99.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Hong Liu, “An Emerging China and Diasporic Chinese: Historicity, State, and International Relations,” Journal of Contemporary China 20, no. 72 (2011): 813–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 4.
    Andrew Hurrell, “Power, Institutions, and the Production of Inequality,” in Power in Global Governance, ed. Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 44.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    David Shambaugh, China’s Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2008).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Susan L. Shirk, China: Fragile Superpower (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kingsley Edney 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kingsley Edney

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations