Advertisement

Propaganda in Chinese Domestic Politics

  • Kingsley Edney
Part of the Asia Today book series (ASIAT)

Abstract

Propaganda practices involve the Party-state exercising power in order to affect how discourses are publicly articulated. The Party-state uses propaganda practices to reproduce its official narrative about key political concepts and issues as well as to suppress any rival narratives that threaten to undermine the shared meanings that legitimize CCP rule. This is intended to prevent the emergence of a coherent alternative political project that could challenge the existing political order. Although these attempts to control public discourse cannot guarantee that people will always accept the assumptions embedded in the official narrative, they are designed to increase the likelihood that the Party-state’s official narrative will prevail in its ideological struggles with alternative interpretations of Chinese politics and society. This chapter focuses on the propaganda practices the Party-state uses to exercise power in the domestic political context and begins by identifying the official institutions that are responsible for carrying out the Party-state’s propaganda practices. This shows the extent to which such institutions are embedded in the structure of the Chinese political system and highlights the fact that all areas of public discourse to some degree fall under the purview of the Party-state.

Keywords

Internet User Media Outlet Official Discourse Falun Gong Internet Cafe 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Anne-Marie Brady, Marketing Dictatorship: Propaganda and Thought Work in Contemporary China (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2008); David Shambaugh, “China’s Propaganda System: Institutions, Processes and Efficacy,” The China Journal, no. 57 (2007): 25–58.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alice L. Miller, “The CCP Central Committee’s Leading Small Groups,” China Leadership Monitor 26 (2008): 1, 3, http://media.hoover.org/docu-ments/CLM26AM.pdf.Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    The others are the PLA, the internal security bureaucracies, and the Organization Department, which is responsible for most CCP and government appointments. Susan L. Shirk, China: Fragile Superpower (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), 83–84.Google Scholar
  4. 16.
    Unger writes that after the Communist revolution historians “were to serve as handmaidens to the Party propagandists.” Jonathan Unger, Introduction, to Using the Past to Serve the Present: Historiography and Politics in Contemporary China, ed. Jonathan Unger (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpé, 1993), 3.Google Scholar
  5. 31.
    On professionalism and Chinese journalists, see Zhongdang Pan and Ye Lu, “Localizing Professionalism: Discursive Practices in China’s Media Reforms,” in Chinese Media, Global Contexts, ed. Chin-Chuan Lee (London: Routledge Curzon, 2003);Google Scholar
  6. Hugo de Burgh, The Chinese Journalist: Mediating Information in the World’s Most Populous Country (London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003), 105–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 32.
    Ashley Esarey, Speak No Evil: Mass Media Control in Contemporary China (Washington, DC: Freedom House, 2006), 4–5.Google Scholar
  8. 36.
    Yuezhi Zhao, Communication in China: Political Economy, Power, and Conflict (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2008), 44.Google Scholar
  9. 39.
    Jonathan Hassid, “Controlling the Chinese Media: An Uncertain Business,” Asian Survey 48, no. 3 (2008): 414–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 40.
    He Qinglian, The Fog of Censorship: Media Control in China, trans. Paul Frank (New York: Human Rights in China, 2008), xviii;Google Scholar
  11. Zhao, Media, Market, and Democracy in China: Between the Party Line and the Bottom Line (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1998), 127.Google Scholar
  12. 41.
    The intellectual magazine Yanhuang Chunqiu and the Southern Media Group that publishes newspapers such as Nanfang Dushi Bao (Southern Metropolis Daily) and Nanfang Zhoumo (Southern Weekend) are two likely examples of this. Pan describes the Southern Media Group as “a camp for the party’s liberal wing.” Philip Pan, Out of Mao’s Shadow: The Struggle for the Soul of a New China (London: Picador, 2008), 239.Google Scholar
  13. 48.
    Madeline Earp, “Although Not Explicit, Legal Threats to Journalists Persist,” in Challenged in China: The Shifting Dynamics of Censorship and Control (Committee to Protect Journalists, March 2013), http://cpj.org/reports/china2013.pdf.Google Scholar
  14. problems connected to existing institutions. Alex Chan, “From Propaganda to Hegemony: Jiaodian Fangtan and China’s Media Policy,” Journal of Contemporary China 11, no. 30 (2002): 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 59.
    Alex Chan, “Guiding Public Opinion through Social Agenda-Setting: China’s Media Policy since the 1990s,” Journal of Contemporary China 16, no. 53 (2007): 547–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 61.
    Tianyong Zhou, Wang Changjiang, and Wang Anling, eds., Gong Jian: Shiqi da hou Zhongguo zhengzhi tizhi gaige yanjiu baogao [Storming the barricades: Research report on China’s political system reform after the 17th Party Congress] (Wujiaqu: Xinjiang Shengchan Jianshe Bingtuan Chubanshe, 2007), 15, 68.Google Scholar
  17. 64.
    See Xin Xu, “Modernizing China in the Olympic Spotlight: China’s National Identity and the 2008 Beijing Olympiad,” in Sport Mega-Events: Social Scientific Analyses of a Global Phenomenon, ed. John Horne and Wolfram Manzenreiter (Maiden, MA: Blackwell, 2006);Google Scholar
  18. Maurice Roche, Mega-Events and Modernity: Olympics and Expos in the Growth of Global Culture (London: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar
  19. 65.
    Susan Brownell, Beijing’s Games: What the Olympics Mean to China (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2008), 88.Google Scholar
  20. 66.
    Anne-Marie Broudehoux, The Making and Selling of Post-Mao Beijing (New York: Routledge, 2004), 161.Google Scholar
  21. 68.
    Yongnian Zheng, Technological Empowerment: The Internet, State, and Society in China (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007), xiii.Google Scholar
  22. However, Internet cafes and commercial Internet accounts did not appear until 1995. Guobin Yang, The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009), 162.Google Scholar
  23. 69.
    On the satirical use of mobile phone text messages during the SARS crisis, see Haiqing Yu, “Talking, Linking, Clicking: The Politics of AIDS and SARS in Urban China,” Positions 15, no. 1 (2007): 46–50.Google Scholar
  24. 72.
    Hu Yong, Zhong sheng xuanhua: Wangluo shidai de geren biaoda yu gonggong taolun [The rising cacophony: Personal expression and public discussion in the Internet age] (Guilin: Guangxi Shifan Daxue Chubanshe, 2008), 93.Google Scholar
  25. 73.
    The authorities closed the Tsinghua-based BBS in 2005. Yang, The Tower of the Internet in China, 53. Qiangguo Tuntan was originally set up by the Teople’s Daily website in response to the outpouring of nationalist sentiment following NATO’s 1999 bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade. Xu Wu, Chinese Cyber Nationalism: Evolution, Characteristics, and Implications (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2007), 48.Google Scholar
  26. 82.
    Haiqing Yu, Media and Cultural Transformation in China (London: Routledge, 2009), 11. See also Hu Yong, Zhong sheng xuanhua [The rising cacophony], 259–74.Google Scholar
  27. 88.
    Rebecca MacKinnon, “Cyber Zone,” Index on Censorship 37, no. 2 (2008): 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 103.
    Guoguang Wu, “In the Name of Good Governance: E-Government, Internet Pornography and Political Censorship in China,” in China’s Information and Communications Technology Revolution: Social Changes and State Responses, ed. Xiaoling Zhang and Yongnian Zheng (London: Routledge, 2009).Google Scholar
  29. 110.
    Guobin Yang, “Contesting Food Safety in the Chinese Media: Between Hegemony and Counter Hegemony,” The China Quarterly 214 (2013): 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 112.
    For an in-depth discussion of intellectuals in contemporary China, see Edward Gu and Merle Goldman, eds., Chinese Intellectuals between State and Market (London: Routledge Curzon, 2004).Google Scholar
  31. 114.
    Mark Leonard, What Does China Think? (London: Fourth Estate, 2008), 17. This is not to say, however, that there is a simple dividing line between those intellectuals who work for the political establishment and those who follow a dissenting line—the reality is much more complex.Google Scholar
  32. See Timothy Cheek, “Xu Jilin and the Thought Work of China’s Public Intellectuals,” The China Quarterly 186 (2006): 401–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 116.
    Perry Link, “The Anaconda in the Chandelier,” The New York Review of Books 49, no. 6 (2002): 67–70;Google Scholar
  34. Edward Gu and Merle Goldman, “Introduction: The Transformation of the Relationship between Chinese Intellectuals and the State,” in Chinese Intellectuals between State and Market, ed. Edward Gu and Merle Goldman (London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004), 10. According to Link this self-censorship also affects foreign intellectuals and businesspeople of both Chinese and non-Chinese origin. For a personal account of such self-censorship, see Ann Condi, “Changing the Subject: The ‘Invisible’ Control Mechanism in Chinese Media,” AsiaMedia, June 22, 2004, http://www.asiamedia.ucla.edu/article.asp?parentid=12169.Google Scholar
  35. 117.
    Kraus notes that most screening of artwork is carried out by editors, managers, and administrators, with only some areas, like film and television, under close official supervision. Richard Curt Kraus, The Party and the Arty in China: The New Politics of Culture (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2004), 109–10.Google Scholar
  36. 120.
    See Pitman B. Potter, “Belief in Control: Regulation of Religion in China,” The China Quarterly 173 (2003): 317–37.Google Scholar
  37. 123.
    Ibid; Tony Saich, “Negotiating the State: The Development of Social Organizations in China,” The China Quarterly 161 (2000): 129–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 124.
    Guobin Yang, “Environmental NGOs and Institutional Dynamics in China,” The China Quarterly 181 (2005): 54–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 126.
    Yongnian Zheng, The Chinese Communist Party as Organizational Emperor: Culture, Reproduction and Transformation (Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2010), 146.Google Scholar
  40. 127.
    Suisheng Zhao, “A State-Led Nationalism: The Patriotic Education Campaign in Post-Tiananmen China,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 31, no. 3 (1998): 288–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 128.
    Ibid., 292–93. See also Suisheng Zhao, A Nation-State by Construction: Dynamics of Modern Chinese Nationalism (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004), 9.Google Scholar
  42. 129.
    See Rachel Murphy, “Turning Peasants into Modern Chinese Citizens: “Population Quality” Discourse, Demographic Transition and Primary Education,” The China Quarterly 177 (2004): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 131.
    Andrew J. Nathan, “Authoritarian Resilience,” Journal of Democracy 14, no. 1 (2003): 16.Google Scholar
  44. 132.
    David Shambaugh, China’s Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2008), 169.Google Scholar
  45. 133.
    See ss Zhao, A Nation-State by Construction; Peter Hays Gries, China’s New Nationalism: Pride, Politics, and Diplomacy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004);Google Scholar
  46. William A. Callahan, “National Insecurities: Humiliation, Salvation, and Chinese Nationalism,” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 29, no. 2 (2004): 199–218;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maria Hsia Chang, Return of the Dragon: China’s Wounded Nationalism (Boulder, CO: Westview, 2001);Google Scholar
  48. Edward Friedman, “Still Building the Nation: The Causes and Consequences of China’s Patriotic Fervor,” in Chinese Political Culture 1989–2000, ed. Shiping Hua (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2001).Google Scholar
  49. 136.
    On heroic news narratives, see Peter C. Pugsley, “Constructing the Hero: Nationalistic News Narratives in Contemporary China,” Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 3, no. 1 (2006): 78–93.Google Scholar
  50. 137.
    On the importance of international status for China see Yong Deng, “Better than Power: ‘International Status’ in Chinese Foreign Policy,” in China Rising: Tower and Motivation in Chinese Foreign Policy, ed. Yong Deng and Fei-Ling Wang (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005).Google Scholar
  51. Ian Buruma, Bad Elements: Chinese Rebels from Los Angeles to Beijing (New York: Vintage Books, 2002), 335;Google Scholar
  52. Jacques deLisle, “‘One World, Different Dreams’: The Contest to Define the Beijing Olympics,” in Owning the Olympics: Narratives of the New China, ed. Monroe E. Price and Daniel Dayan (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008), 23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kingsley Edney 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kingsley Edney

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations