Advertisement

Naming the World: Situating Freirean Pedagogics in the Philosophical Problematic of Nuestra América

  • Jon L. Mansell
Chapter
Part of the Marxism and Education book series (MAED)

Abstract

Since the first publication of his Pedagogy of the Oppressed in Brazil in 1968, the work of Paulo Freire has come to be a source of inspiration to political militants, socially engaged educators and critical scholars throughout the world. In particular many theorists and practitioners working across both the global north and south have seen in Freire’s work rich resources for a renovation of the praxis of emancipatory politics. An important contribution in this volume to this renovation is offered by Sara Motta, developed in dialogue with theorists of Open Marxism, to challenge the monological representative politics of twentieth-century socialism. Instead, according to Motta, the Freirian approach to pedagogy is suggestive of a form of politics that is lived through “the transformation of subjectivity into non-alienated social flows of being, doing, living and loving” (chapter 3, in this volume). Here politics becomes a process of everyday life, of the construction of self that inherently contests the separation between politics and life implied within twentieth-century social democratic and socialist theories of the state.

Keywords

Sixteenth Century Colonial Period American Context Ethical Commitment Popular Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altamirano, M. and Sarlo, B. (1995), “The Auto Dictat and the Learning Machine,” in Donghi, T. H., Jaksic, I., Kirpatrick, G., and Masiello, F. (eds.), Sarmiento: Author of a Nation, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barber, M. (1996), Ethical Hermeneutics: Rationality in Enrique Dussel’s Philosophy of Liberation, New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bello, A. (1997), Selected Writings of Andrés Bello, López-Morilla, F. M. (trans), Jaksić, I. (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. De Sousa Santos, B. (2007), “Beyond Abyssal Thinking: From Global Lines to Ecologies of Knowledge,” Revista Crítica de Ciéncias Sociais 78: pp. 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dussel, E. (1994), “Leopoldo Zea’s Project for a Latin American Philosophy of History,” in Chanady, A. (ed.), Latin American Identity and Constructions of Difference, Vol. 10, Minneapolis: University of Minnessota Press, pp. 26–42.Google Scholar
  6. — (1995), The Invention of the Americas: The Eclipse of the “Other” and the Myth of Modernity, Barber, M. D. (trans.), New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  7. Echevarría, R. G. (1995), “A Lost World Rediscovered,” in Donghi, T. H., Jaksic, I., Kirpatrick, G., and Masiello, F. (eds.), Sarmiento: Author of a Nation, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Echeverría, E. (1993), El Matadero, Madrid: Catedra.Google Scholar
  9. Freire, P. (1996), Pedagogy of the Oppressed, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. — (2001), Pedagogy of Freedom: Ethics, Democracy and Civic Courage, London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  11. García-Márquez, G. (1992), The Solitude of Latin America, Nobel Prize for Literature Acceptance Speech, http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/1982/marquez-lecture.html.Google Scholar
  12. Garrido, J. M. (2007), “The Desire to Think: A Note on Latin American Philosophy,” CR: The New Centennial Review 7(3): pp. 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guardiola-Rivera, O. (2002), “State of Grace: Ideology, Capitalism and the Geopolitics of Knowledge,” Nepantla: Views from the South 3(1): pp. 15–38.Google Scholar
  14. Katra, W. H. (1995), “Re-reading Viajes: Race, Identity and National Destiny,” in Jaksic, I., Kirpatrick, G, and Masiello, F. (eds.), Sarmiento: Author of a Nation, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lankshear, C. (1994), Critical Literacy: Politics, Praxis and the Postmodern, New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  16. Maciel, D. (1985), “An Interview with Leopoldo Zea,” Hispanic-American Historical Review 65(1): pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mignolo, W. D. (1992), “Nebrija in the New World: The Question of the Letter, the colonisation of American Languages and the Discontinuity of Classical Tradition,” L’Homme 32: pp. 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. — (1995), The Darker Side of the Renaissance: Literacy, Territoriality and Colonialization, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  19. — (2000), Local Hastories/Global Desagns: Colonialaty, Subaltern Knowledges and Border Thinking, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Nebrija, A. (2007), “La Gramática de la lengua castellana,” http://www.antoniodenebrija.org/indice.html.Google Scholar
  21. O’Gorman, E. (1961), The Invention of America: An Inquiry into the Historical Nature of the New World and the Meaning of Its History, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Quijano, A. (2008), “Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism and Social Classification,” in Dussel, E., Morena, M., and Juaregui, C. A. (eds.), Coloniaity at Large: Latin America and the Postcolonial Debate, London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Sarmiento, D. F. (1998), Facundo or Civilisation and Barbarism, Mary Mann (trans.), New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  24. Zea, L. (1963), The Latin American Mind, Abbot, J. H. and Dunham, L. (trans.), Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sara C. Motta and Mike Cole 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon L. Mansell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations