Advertisement

Schools, Ritual Economies, and the Expanding State:The Changing Roles of Lao Buddhist Monks as “Traditional Intellectuals”

  • Patrice Ladwig

Abstract

In 2004, I walked into the office of UNICEF in Vientiane to interview a Lao member of staff. I was interested in a program set up by UNICEF with the Lao Buddhist Fellowship Organization, in which monks were engaged in prevention work by disseminating information about HIV in remote villages. The project was supposed to combine “traditional” methods of teaching on compassion and Buddhist precepts with new forms of information distribution. In this project, monks were praised as ideal disseminators due to their elevated status, knowledge, and authority in moral matters (Mettathamma, 2003; Ladwig, 2008, p. 475f). After a friendly and long conversation, my counterpart—himself a devout Buddhist in his late fifties—and I came to the million-dollar question of the development of the business at hand: the efficiency of the program and its overall impact. He gave me a critical look, and after a short moment of hesitation answered:

I think Buddhist monks in Laos have lost their leading position in society. There were so many fields in which they were involved in the past. What has remained of this? The development of modern Lao society has overtaken them and the ideas of most monks’ haven’t changed very much although society has. There are many reasons for this, like, for example, Laos’ isolation in the past, the missing possibilities for monks to study new topics and so forth.

Keywords

Colonial Rule Traditional Intellectual Moral Economy French Colonial Intellectual Elite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abhay, T. (1956). Le Bouddhisme Lao. France-Asie 118–120, 917–936.Google Scholar
  2. Abrams, P. (1988). Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State. Journal of Historical Sociology 1 (1), 58–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Althusser, L. (1977). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards An Investigation). In Ben Brewster (Trans.), Lenin, Philosophy and Other Essays, pp. 121–173. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous. (1964). Buddhist Morality for Elementary Schools. Vientiane: Ministry of Education. [In Lao.].Google Scholar
  5. Asad, T. (1993). Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. —. (2003). Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Asia Foundation. (1966). Report on Buddhism and Buddhist Programming in Laos. San Francisco, CA: Asia Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Barber, M. (1974). “Urbanisation” and Religion in Laos—A Comparative Study. In M. Barber and A. Dore (Eds.), Sangkhom Khady San: Colloquium of Researchers in The Human Sciences. Luang Prabang: (publisher unknown).Google Scholar
  9. Bechert, H. (1967). Buddhismus, Staat Und Gesellschaft in Den Ländern Des Theravāda Buddhismus (Band II). Goettingen: Metzner.Google Scholar
  10. Bertrand, D., and Chantharavady Choulamany. (2008). Mental Health in the Lao PDR. Juth Pakai, 5, 6–17.Google Scholar
  11. Bhikkhu Mettanando. (1999). Meditation and Healing in the Theravāda Buddhist Order of Thailand and Laos. Hamburg: University of Hamburg Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Genesis and Structure of the Religious Field. Comparative Social Research, 13, 1–44.Google Scholar
  13. —. (1994). Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field. Sociological Theory12 (1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapelier, G., and J. van Malderghem. (1971). Plain of Jars: Social Change under Five Years of Pathet Lao Administration. Asia Quarterly10 (1), 61–89.Google Scholar
  15. Chapelier, G., and Vongsavanh Boutsavath. (1973). Lao Popular Buddhism and Community Development. Journal of the Siam Society61 (2), 1–38.Google Scholar
  16. Coedès, G. (1968). The Indianized States of Southeast Asia. Honululu: Hawai’i University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Collins, S. (1998). Nirvana and Other Buddhist Felicities: Utopias of the Pali Imaginaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Condominas, G. (1959). La plaine de Vientiane. Paris: Commissariat au plan.Google Scholar
  19. —. (1998). Le Bouddhisme au village. Vientiane: EFEO.Google Scholar
  20. Deacon, R. (2006). From Confinement to Attachment: Michel Foucault on the Rise of the School. The European Legacy11 (2), 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Egge, J. (2002). Religious Giving and the Invention of Karma in Theravāda Buddhism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Evans, G. (1990). Lao Peasant under Socialism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  23. —. (1993). Buddhism and Economic Action in Socialist Laos. In C. Hann (Ed.), Postsocialism. Ideals, Ideologies and Practices in Eurasia. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. —. (1998). The Politics of Ritual and Remembrance: Laos Since 1975. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press.Google Scholar
  25. —. (2002). A Short History of Laos: The Land in Between. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  26. —. (2008). Lao Peasant Studies Today. In Y. Goudineau and M. Lorillard (Eds.), Nouvelles recherches sur le Laos. Paris and Vientiane: EFEO.Google Scholar
  27. Ferguson, J. (1999). Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Foucault, M. (1994). La naissance de la médecine sociale. In D. Defert and F. Ewald (Eds.), Dits et écrits, 1954–1988, pp. 207–228. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  29. —. (2006). Governmentality. In Akhil Gupta and Aradhana Sharma (Eds.), The Anthropology of the State: A Reader. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Goscha, C., and S. Ivarsson. (2007). Prince Phetsarath (1890–1959): Nationalism and Royalty in the Making of Modern Laos. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies38 (1), 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Gunn, G. (1990). Rebellion in Laos. Peasant and Politics in a Colonial Backwater. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  33. —. (1992). Prince Souphanouvong: Revolutionary and Intellectual. Journal of Contemporary Asia22 (1), 529–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. —. (1998). Theravadins, Colonialists and Commissars in Laos. Bangkok: White Lotus.Google Scholar
  35. Ha, M. (2003). From “nos ancêtres, les Gaulois” to “leur culture ancestrale”: Symbolic Violence and the Politics of Colonial Schooling in Indochina. French Colonial History 3, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Halpern, J. M. (1961). Capital, Savings and Credit among Lao Peasants. Proceedings from Werner Grenn Symposium on Economy and Anthropology (paper No. 6). Chicago.Google Scholar
  37. —. (1964). Government, Politics, and Social Structure in Laos: a Study of Transition and Innovation. New Haven, CT: Southeast Asia Studies, Yale University.Google Scholar
  38. Hansen, A. (2007). How to Behave. Buddhism and Modernity in Colonial Cambodia 1860–1930. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hansen, T. B., and F. Stepputat. (2001). Introduction: States of Imagination. In T. B. Hansen and F. Stepputat (Eds.), States of Imagination: Ethnographic Explorations of the Postcolonial State. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Harris, I. C. (2007). Buddhism, Power and Political Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. High, H. (2006). Work Together, Act Together, for the Common Good, Solidarity! Village Formation in Southern Laos. Sojourn21 (1), 22–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ireson, R. (1996). Evolving Village-State Relations in the Lao PDR: Time, Space, Ethnicity. In Butler-Diaz, J. (Ed.), New Laos, New Challenges. Temple: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
  43. Ishii, Y. (1986). Sangha, State and Society: Thai Buddhism in History. Honululu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  44. Ivarsson, S. (1999). Bringing Laos into Existence. Laos between Indochina and Siam 1860–1945. PhD dissertation, Copenhagen University.Google Scholar
  45. —. (2008): Creating Laos. The Making of a Lao Space between Indochina and Siam, 1860–1945. Copenhagen: NIAS.Google Scholar
  46. Kemp, J. (1988). Seductive Mirage: The Search for the Village Community in Southeast Asia. Dordrecht: Fordis.Google Scholar
  47. Keyes, C. (1990). Buddhist Practical Morality in Changing Agrarian World: A Case Study from Northeastern Thailand. In F. Russel and D. K. Swearer (Eds.), Ethics, Wealth and Salvation. A Study in Buddhist Social Ethics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  48. Koret, P. (1996). Past and Present Lao Perceptions of Traditional Literature. In J. Butler-Diaz (Ed.), New Laos, New Challenges. Temple: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
  49. Kourilsky, G. (2006). Recherches sur l’institute bouddique au Laos (1930–1949): Les circonstances de sa création, son action, sonéchec. Unpublished masters thesis. EPHE, Paris.Google Scholar
  50. Kurtz, D. (1996). Hegemony and Anthropology: Gramsci, Exegeses, Reinterpretations. Critique of Anthropology16 (2), 103–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ladwig, P. (2008). Between Cultural Preser vation and This-Worldly Commitment: Modernization, Social Activism and the Lao Buddhist Sangha. In Y. Goudineau and M. Lorillard (Eds.), Nouvelles recherches sur le Laos. Paris and Vientiane: EFEO.Google Scholar
  52. —. (2009a). Prediger der Revolution: Der buddhistische Klerus und seine Verbindungen zur kommunistischen Bewegung in Laos (1957–1975). Jahrbuchfü r Historische Kommunismusforschung, XV, 181–197.Google Scholar
  53. —. (2009b). Narrative Ethics: The Excess of Giving and Moral Ambiguity in the Lao Vessantara-Jataka. In M. Heintz (Ed.), The Anthropology of Moralities. Oxford and New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  54. —. (2011). The Genesis and Demarcation of the Religious Field: Monasteries, State Schools, and the Secular Sphere in Lao Buddhism (1893–1975). Sojourn. Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia26 (2), 196–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lafont, P. B. (1982). Buddhism in Contemporary Laos. In M. Stuart-Fox (Ed.), Contemporary Laos. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  56. Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Ling, T. (1993). Buddhist Trends in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  58. Lipset, S. (1959). American Intellectuals: Their Politics and Status. Daedalus, 88, 460–486.Google Scholar
  59. Maha Khamthan Thepbuali. (1976). Buddhism and Society. Vientiane: Neo Lao Haksat [in Lao].Google Scholar
  60. Maha Sila Viravong. (2004). My Life—Buddhist Predictions and Poems from the ’40s. Vientiane, Doked Press [Lao-English].Google Scholar
  61. McDaniel, J. (2008). Gathering Leaves and Lifting Words. Histories of Buddhist Monastic Education in Laos and Thailand. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  62. Mignot, F. (2003). Santéet intégration nationale au Laos. Rencontres entre montagnards et gens des plaines. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  63. Mitchell, T. (2002). Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  64. —. (2006). Society, Economy, and the State Effect. In A. Gupta and A. Sharma (Eds.), The Anthropology of the State: A Reader, pp. 169–186. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  65. —. (Ed.) (2000). Questions of Modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  66. Moermann, M. (1969). A Thai Village Headman as a Synaptic Leader. Journal of Asian Studies28 (3), 535–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Obeyesekere G., F. Reynolds, and B. Smith (1972). The Two Wheels of the Dhamma: Essays on the Theravāda Tradition in India and Ceylon. Chambersburg, PA: American Academy of Religion.Google Scholar
  68. Phoumi Vongvichit. (1987). Memoirs of My Life. Vientiane: Lao State Printing [in Lao].Google Scholar
  69. —. (1995). The New Perfection and the Revolutionary Morality. Vientiane: Lao State Printing [in Lao].Google Scholar
  70. Phouvong Phimmasone. (1973). L’organisation du Bouddhisme au Laos. Bulletin des amis du Royaume Lao, 9, 121–129.Google Scholar
  71. Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation. London: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  72. Popkin, S. L. (1979). The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  73. Portelli, H. (1974). Gramsci et la question religieuse. Paris: Anthropos.Google Scholar
  74. Pottier, R. (2007). Yu di mi haeng. etre bien, avoir de la force. Essai sur les pratiques therapeutiques lao. Paris: EFEO.Google Scholar
  75. Rehbein, B. (2007). Globalization, Society and Culture in Laos. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  76. Said, E. W. (1994). Representations of the Intellectual. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  77. Schneider, A. (2001). Laos im 20. Jahrhundert: Kolonie und Königreich, befreite Zone und Volksrepublik. [Working Paper No. 21] Berlin: Humboldt University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Schober, J. (1995). The Theravāda Buddhist Engagement with Modernity in Southeast Asia: Whither the Paradigm of the Galactic Polity?. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies26 (2), 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Scott, J. (1976). The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  80. —. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Shils, E. (1972). The Intellectuals and the Powers, and Other Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  82. Strenski, I. (1983). On Generalized Exchange and the Domestication of the Sangha. Man (NS), 18, 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stuart-Fox, M. (1997). A History of Laos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Stuart-Fox, M., and R. Bucknell. (1982). Politicization of the Buddhist Sangha in Laos. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies13 (1), 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Taillard, C. (1974). Essai sur la bi-polarisation autour du vat et de l’école des villages Lao de la plaine de Vientiane: Le bouddhisme populaire confronte au développementéconomique. Asie du Sud-est et Monde Insulindien 5 (3), 91–104.Google Scholar
  86. —. (1977). Le village Lao de la région Vientiane: Un pouvoir local enface au pouvoir étatique. L’Homme17 (2–3), 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. —. (1979). Le dualisme urbain-rural au Laos et la récupération de l’idéologie traditionnelle. Asie du Sud-est et Monde Insulindien10 (2–4), 91–108.Google Scholar
  88. Tambiah, S. J. (1968). Literacy in a Buddhist Village in North-East Thailand. In J. Goody (Ed.), Literacy in Traditional Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  89. —. (1976). World Conqueror and World Renouncer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Taylor, C. (2007). A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Taylor, J. L. (1993). Forest Monks and the Nation-State: An Anthropological and Historical Study in Northeastern Thailand. Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
  92. Trouillot, M. (2001). The Anthropology of the State in the Age of Globalization: Close Encounters of the Deceptive Kind. Current Anthropology41 (1), 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. UNICEF and The Lao Buddhist Fellowship Organization. (2003). Mettathamma project Paper. Vientiane: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  94. Vacca, G. (1982). Intellectuals and the Marxist theory of the State. In A. Sassoon (Ed.), Approaches to Gramsci, pp. 37–69. London: Writers and Readers.Google Scholar
  95. Vannasopha, K. M. (2003). Religious affaire in Lao PDR. Vientiane: Ministry of Information and Culture.Google Scholar
  96. Walzer, M. (1989). In the Company of Critics: Social Criticism and Political Commitment in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  97. Williams, R. (1977). Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  98. Zago, M. (1972). Rites et cérémonies en milieu bouddhiste Lao. Rome: Universita Gregoriana.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John Whalen-Bridge and Pattana Kitiarsa 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrice Ladwig

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations