Advertisement

Introduction

  • Joachim Gentz
  • Perry Schmidt-Leukel

Abstract

Over the past three decades, the question of religious diversity—in particular, the question of how different religious traditions relate to and deal with religious diversity—has attracted public attention and has become one of the central issues within the global academic discussion in political and social sciences, philosophy, theology, and religious studies.

Keywords

Religious Practice Religious Tradition Common People Religious Diversity Chinese Tradition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Donald Harper, “Warring States Natural Philosophy and Occult Thought,” in The Cambridge History of Ancient China, ed. M. Loewe and E. Shaughnessy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 813–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Michael Nylan, The Shifting Center: The OriginalGreat Planand Later Readings (St. Augustin, Nettetal: Monumenta Serica, 1992), 105–146.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    James Legge, The Shoo King or the Book of Historical Documents in The Chinese Classics, vol. 2 (Taipei: Southern Materials Center, 1991; orig. London: Trubner, 1865, vol. 3), 337–338.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sarah A. Queen, Han Feizi and the Old Master: A Comparative Analysis and Translation of Han Feizi, Chapter 20, “Jie Lao,” and Chapter 21, “Yu Lao,” in Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Han Fei, ed. Paul R. Goldin (New York: Springer, 2013), 197–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bachu baijia duzun rushu. This can be found in Hanshu 56 in a memorial ascribed to Dong Zhongshu (c. 195–115), composed in either 140 or 134 BCE. Cf. Sarah A. Queen, From Chronicle to Canon: The Hermeneutics of the Spring and Autumn According to Tung Chung-shu (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), Appendix 2. The dates of the Han-shu 56 memorials, 249–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. J. Dewoskin, trans., Doctors, Diviners and Magicians of Ancient China: Biographies of Fang-shih (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erik Zürcher, “Zum Verhältnis von Kirche und Staat in China während der Frühzeit des Buddhismus,” Saeculum 10, no. 1 (1959): 73–81.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walter Liebenthal, “Chinese Buddhism During the 4th and the 5th Centuries,” Monumenta Nipponica 11, no. 1 (1955): 44–83. Robert H. Sharf even argues that an Indian-Chinese dialogue never took place and that Chinese Buddhism solely discussed Chinese topics, cf. Coming to Terms with Chinese Buddhism (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2002), introduction, esp. 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stephen R. Bokenkamp, Ancestors and Anxiety. Daoism and the Birth of Rebirth in China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007);Google Scholar
  10. Christine Mollier, Buddhism and Taoism Face to Face: Scripture, Ritual, and Iconographic Exchange in Medieval China (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2008).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Erik Zürcher, The Buddhist Conquest of China (Leiden: Brill, 1959), Chapters 5 and 6.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Richard B. Mather, “K’ou Ch’ien-chih and the Taoist Theocracy at the Northern Wei Court 425–451,” in Facets of Taoism: Essays in Chinese Religion, ed. A. Seidel and H. Welch (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1979), 103–122.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Liu Ts’un-Yan, “The Syncretism of the Three Teachings in Sung-Yüan China,” in New Excursions from the Hall of Harmonious Wind (Leiden: Brill, 1984), 3–95;Google Scholar
  14. Mary M. Garrett, “The ‘Three Doctrines Discussions’ of Tang China: Religious Debate as a Rhetorical Strategy,” Argumentation & Advocacy 30, no. 3 (1994): 150–161. http://ccbs.ntu.edu.tw/FULLTEXT/JR-ADM/garrett.htm. Accessed June 15, 2007.Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    David Johnson, “The City-God Cults of T’ang and Sung China,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 45, no. 2 (1985): 363–457, esp. 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 15.
    Thomas A. Wilson, Genealogy of the Way: The Construction and Uses of the Confucian Tradition in Late Imperial China (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995);Google Scholar
  17. Helwig Schmidt-Glintzer, Die Identität der buddhistischen Schulen und die Kompilation buddhistischer Universalgeschichten in China: ein Beitrag zur Geistesgeschichte der Sung-Zeit (Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1982);Google Scholar
  18. Jan Yü-hua, “Buddhist Historiography in Sung China,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 114, no. 2 (1964): 360–381.Google Scholar
  19. 16.
    Hubert Michael Seiwert and Ma Xisha, Popular Religious Movements and Heterodox Sects in Chinese History (Leiden: Brill, 2003).Google Scholar
  20. 17.
    Barend J. ter Haar, The White Lotus Teachings in Chinese Religious History (Leiden: Brill, 1992).Google Scholar
  21. 18.
    Daniel L. Overmyer, Precious Volumes: An Introduction to Chinese Sectarian Scriptures from the Sixteenth to the Seventeenth Centuries (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 1999).Google Scholar
  22. 19.
    Livia Kohn, The Daoist Monastic Manual: A Translation of the Fengdao Kejie (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), 12–13.Google Scholar
  23. 20.
    Anthony C. Yu, State and Religion in China: Historical and Textual Perspectives (Chicago: Open Court, 2005), 145.Google Scholar
  24. 21.
    Kenneth Dean, “Local Ritual Traditions of Southeast China: A Challenge to Definitions of Religion and Theories of Ritual,” in Social Scientific Studies of Religion in China, ed. Yang Fenggang and Graeme Lang (Boston: Brill, 2011), 133–162, esp. 143.Google Scholar
  25. 22.
    Kenneth Dean, “Local Communal Religion in Contemporary South-East China,” China Quarterly 174 (2003): 338–358;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kenneth Dean and Zheng Zhenman, Ritual Alliances of the Putian Plains, 2 vols. (Leiden: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar
  27. 23.
    Christopher Jensen, “‘After All, He Will Be a God One Day’: Religious Interpretations of Mao in Modern China,” MA thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, 2008, 49–74. http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-091720 08–132209/unrestricted/JensenC.pdf. Accessed January 14, 2012.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Perry Schmidt-Leukel and Joachim Gentz 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joachim Gentz
  • Perry Schmidt-Leukel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations