Advertisement

A Human Rights-Based Approach to Poverty: The South African Experience

  • Linda Jansen van Rensburg
Chapter

Abstract

There exist numerous definitions of poverty. Traditionally, poverty has been associated with a lack of resources.1 The more recent concept of social exclusion2 is now no longer seen as an alternative to the poverty concept, but as a more comprehensive concept, which concerns much more than money. In fact, poverty (referring to a lack of disposable income) can be seen as part of the multidimensional and dynamic concept of social exclusion (referring to multifaceted failure). Social exclusion, therefore, has to be understood with reference to the failure of any one or more of the following: (i) the democratic and legal system (civic integration); (ii) the labour market (economic integration); (iii) the welfare state system (social integration); and (iv) the family and community system (interpersonal integration).3

Keywords

Human Dignity Social Protection Social Assistance Permanent Resident Social Grant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adato, M. M. Carter and J. May (2004) ‘Sense in Sociability? Social Exclusion and Persistent Poverty in South Africa’ Basis Brief CRSP, no. 25 1–4 available on the internet http://www.basis.wisc.edu/live/basbrief25.pdf.Google Scholar
  2. Arambulo, K. (1999) Strengthening the Supervision on the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Theoretical and Procedural Aspects. Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar
  3. Arat, Z.F. (1991) Democracy and Human Rights in Developing Countries. London: Lynne Reinner Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Berghman, J. (1997) ‘The Resurgence of Poverty and the Struggle against Exclusion: a New Challenge for Social Security?’, International Social Security Review, 50, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brand, D. and S. Russell (2002) Exploring the Core Content of Socio-economic Rights: South African and International Perspectives. Menlo Park: Protea.Google Scholar
  6. Commins, P. (1993) Combating Exclusion in Ireland 1990–1994: A Midway Report. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  7. Committee of Inquiry Into a Comprehensive System of Social Security for South Africa (2002) Transforming the Present — Protecting the Future Consolidated Report. Pretoria: Government Press.Google Scholar
  8. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2001) Poverty and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights E/C.12/2001/10 (Other Treaty-Related Document) (10 May). Available on the internet http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/E.C.12.2001.10.En?Opendocument.Google Scholar
  9. Committee on Economic, Social And Cultural Rights (1990) The Nature of States Parties Obligations No. 3 E/1991/23 (14 December). Available on the internet http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(symbol)/CESCR+General+comment+3.En?OpenDocument.Google Scholar
  10. De Gaay Fortman, B. (2001) Pro Poor Growth, the State and the (Non)-Implementation of the Rights of the Poor, (Unpublished Paper) Lecture for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the RAWOO, The Hague, Foreign Ministry, 26 April.Google Scholar
  11. Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v Grootboom and Others 2000(11) BCLR 1169 (CC).Google Scholar
  12. Hoffmann v SA Airways 2000 21 ILJ 2357 (CC).Google Scholar
  13. International Covenant of Economic Social and Cultural Rights G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 49, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966) U.N.T.S. entered into force 3 January 1976.Google Scholar
  14. Khosa and Others v Minister of Social Development and Others; Mahlaule and Another v Minister of Social Development and Others 2004(6) BCLR 569 (CC).Google Scholar
  15. Malone, M. and D. Belshaw (2003) ‘The Human Rights-Based Approach to Development: overview, context and critical issues’, Transformation, 20(2), 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Noble, M., A. Ratcliffe and G. Wright (2004) Conceptualizing, Defining and Measuring Poverty in South Africa — an Argument for a Consensual Approach. Oxford: CASASP.Google Scholar
  17. Olivier, M.P. and L. Jansen van Rensburg (2002) ‘Addressing the Alleviation of Poverty Through Social Welfare Measures’. Unpublished paper presented at a joint session between CROP and the International Sociological Association (ISA) Research Committee on Sociology of Poverty, Social Welfare and Social Policy at the XVth World Congress of Sociology, entitled Issues in Pro -poor Policy in Non-OECD Countries, Brisbane, Australia, 7–13 July.Google Scholar
  18. Olivier, M.P. and L. Jansen van Rensburg (2006) ‘South African Poverty Law: The Role and Influence of International Human Rights Instruments’, in L. Williams (ed.), International Poverty Law: An Emerging Discourse. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  19. Piron, L.H. (2003) Learning from the UK Department of International Development’s Rights-Based Approach to Development Assistance. Bonn: German Development Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Rodgers, G. (1994) Overcoming Social Exclusion. A contribution to the World Summit for Social Development. Switzerland: International Institute for Labour Studies, ILO.Google Scholar
  21. South African Human Rights Commission (2002/03) ‘5th Economic and Social Rights Report — The right to Social Security’. Available from the Internet http://www.sahrc.org.za/esr_report_2002_2003.htm. Minister of Health and Others v Treatment Action Campaign and Others 2002(10) BCLR 1033 (CC).Google Scholar
  22. United Nations Development Programme (1998) Integrating Human Rights with Sustainable Development. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
  23. United Nations Children’s Fund (2000) Poverty Reduction Begins with Children. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  24. Van Bueren, G. (1999) ‘Alleviating Poverty Through the Constitutional Court’, South African Journal of Human Rights, 15, 52–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Van der Walt, A.J. (2001) ‘Tentative Urgency: sensitivity for the paradoxes of stability and change in social transformation decisions of the Constitutional Court’, South African Public Law, 16(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
  26. Walters v Transitional Local Council of Port Elizabeth & Another 2001 BCLR 98 (LC).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linda Jansen van Rensburg

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations