Advertisement

Education as an Instrument of Democratization and Governance

  • Edna A. Co
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

A traditional perspective on education and democratization is to view students as a potent force in the articulation of democracy, and to focus on students as activists and actors in the field of education. Although students do have a crucial role to play in democratization by way of social mobilization and political activism that puts pressures upon state institutions regarding democratic issues such as education, this chapter takes another viewpoint on the equation of democratization and education. It posits that due to policy negligence (particularly the negligence on education), democratization in a larger sense, and particularly students’ engagement, are powerfully threatened. As such, policy as a highly political process and instrument creates a social exclusion of large segments of the youth in various ways. Such policy therefore needs to be challenged. Social exclusion of the young through the inaccessibility to education is an erosion of democracy and equally raises questions of governance. That education is essential to the life of a nation is a truism that persistently bears repetition among many governments, policy makers, and even among the youth and the students themselves. Just like the health service, the other basic social service that ought to be available to all among developing nations is education.

Keywords

Civil Society Social Exclusion Basic Education Youth Development Private High Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carino, L.V., ed. (1986), Bureaucratic Corruption in Asia: Causes, Consequences and Controls, Manila: JMC Press and the College of Public Administration.Google Scholar
  2. Co, E. (2000), ‘Heterogeneity and Co-operation: Youth and Social Engagement in the Philippines’, forthcoming, Philippine Journal of Public Administration.Google Scholar
  3. — (2000), ‘Youth Initiatives in the Service of the Nation: the Philippine Experience’, a paper prepared for The Worldwide Conference on Youth Service, San Jose, Costa Rica, 5–8 January 2000.Google Scholar
  4. — (1993), Making Education Work Book 1: Education and Manpower Development Programs Vol. 1, Manila: Congressional Oversight Committee on Education (EDCOM).Google Scholar
  5. — (1993), Making Education Work Book1: Governance and Management. Vol. 4, Manila: Education Commission (EDCOM).Google Scholar
  6. EDCOM (1993), Making Education Work Book 3: Agenda for Reforms, Manila: Education Commission (EDCOM).Google Scholar
  7. — (1993), Making Education Work Book 1: The Financing of Philippine Education, Vol. 5, Manila: Education Commission (EDCOM).Google Scholar
  8. — (1993) Making Education Work Book 2: Tertiary Education. Vol. 3 Manila: Education Commission (EDCOM).Google Scholar
  9. Fernandez, E. (2000), ‘War Exacts Heavy Toll on Education in Philippine’ Daily Inquirer, 29 May 2000, Manila.Google Scholar
  10. ILO (1995), Report on the Philippines, Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  11. — (1999), Medium Term Philippine Youth Development Plan: 1998–2004, (Manila: National Youth Commission, Republic of the Philippines.Google Scholar
  12. Tan, E. (1991), The Financing of Vocational-technical Education, Manila: National Manpower Youth Council.Google Scholar
  13. World Bank (1988), Philippines: Education Sector Study, Part 2, Manila: Population and Human Resources Asia Regional Office, World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edna A. Co

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations