Advertisement

Abstract

How does soft power work? What is the relationship between hard power and soft power? What is the relationship between the sources of soft power and the actual practice of soft power? What, then, does it mean to increase soft power as a foreign policy? These are the key questions on soft power that have been hotly debated ever since Nye coined the term “soft power” in a 1990 publication.1 The questions are interrelated, often complicated and conflated.

Keywords

Foreign Policy International Relation Productive Power World Politics Asian Development Bank 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Joseph Nye, “Soft Power,” Foreign Policy 80 (1990): 156–166.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steven Lukes, “Power and the Battle for Hearts and Minds,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33, no. 3 (2005): 477–493, at pp. 477–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Michael Barnett and Robert Duvall, “Power in International Relations,” International Organization 59, no. 1 (2005): 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Janice Bially Mattern, “Why ‘Soft Power’ Isn’t So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33, no. 3 (2005): 583–612, at p. 588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Joseph Nye, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: PublicAffairs. 2004), p. 5.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    Robert Dahl, “The Concept of Power” [1957], in Roderick Bell, David Edwards, and Harrison Wagner (eds.), Political Power: A Reader in Theory and Research (New York: Free Press, 1969), pp. 79–93.Google Scholar
  7. 13.
    Susan Strange, “Toward a Theory of Transnational Empire,” in Ernst-Otto Czempiel and James N. Rosenau (eds.), Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s (Lexington MD: Lexington Books, 1989), pp. 165–166.Google Scholar
  8. 14.
    Robert Wade, “Japan, the World Bank, and the Art of Paradigm Maintenance: The East Asian Miracle in Political Perspective,” New Left Review 217 (1995): 2–37.Google Scholar
  9. 15.
    Yong-wook Lee, The Japanese Challenge to the American Neoliberal World Order: Identity, Meaning and Foreign Policy (Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, 2008). Chapter 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 18.
    Dennis Yasutomo, The New Multilateralism in Japan’s Foreign Policy (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1995), p. 79.Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    Thomas Risse, “Let’s Argue!: Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization 54, no. 4 (2000): 1–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Neta Crawford. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization and Humanitarian Intervention (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 21.
    Jeffrey Chekel, “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change,” International Organization 55, no. 3 (2001): 553–588, at p. 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 22.
    Alan Chong, “Singaporean Foreign Policy and the Asian Values Debate, 1992–2000: Reflections on an Experiment in Soft Power,” Pacific Review 17, no. 1 (2004): 95–133, at pp. 97–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 25.
    Peter Morriss, Power: A Philosophical Analysis (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002 [originally published in 1987]), pp. 32–35.Google Scholar
  16. Peter Morriss, “Steven Lukes on the Concept of Power,” Political Studies Review 4 (2006): 124–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 27.
    Christian Reus-Smit, American Power and World Order (London: Polity, 2004).Google Scholar
  18. 29.
    Steven Lukes, Power: A Radical View (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005 [originally published 1974]).Google Scholar
  19. John Gaventa, Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley (Chicago IL: University of Illinois Press, 1982)Google Scholar
  20. Stefano Guzzini, “The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33, no. 3 (2005): 495–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stefano Guzzini, “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations,” European journal of International Relations, 6, no. 2 (2000): 147–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stefano Guzzini. “Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis,” International Organization 47, no. 3 (1993): 443–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jennifer Sterling-Folker and Rosemary Shinko, “Discourses of Power: Traversing the Realist-Postmodern Divide,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33, no. 3 (2005): 637–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Brian Schmidt, “Competing Realist Conceptions of Power,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33, no. 3 (2005): 523–549, dissects various notions of power within realism.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 30.
    Michel Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (Brighton: Harvester, 1980).Google Scholar
  26. 31.
    Yasushi Watanabe, “Revisiting Soft Power,” paper presented at the Japan Foundation Centre for Global Partnership, 2006. Available online at http://www.cgp.org/articleswin-dow.php.Google Scholar
  27. 32.
    Ian Buruma, Inventing Japan, 1853–1964 (New York: The Modern Library, 2003).Google Scholar
  28. 33.
    Walter LaFeber, The Clash: US-Japanese Relations throughout History (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1997), pp. 23–31.Google Scholar
  29. 34.
    Cemil Aydin, The Politics of Anti-Westernism in Asia: Visions of World Order in Pan-Islamic and Pan-Asian Thought (New York: Columbia University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
  30. 38.
    Shogo Suzuki, “Japan’s Socialization into Janus-Faced European International Society,” European Journal of International Relations 11, no. 1 (2005): 137–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 39.
    Victor Koschmann, “Asianism’s Ambivalent Legacy,” in Peter Katzenstein and Takashi Shiraishi (eds.), Network Power: Japan and Asia (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1997), pp. 83–110Google Scholar
  32. Richard Samuels, Securing Japan: Tokyo’s Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 2007), pp. 15–28.Google Scholar
  33. 41.
    Emanuel Adler, “Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 26, no. 2 (1997): 249–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 43.
    Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organizations 52, no. 4 (1998): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 44.
    Jörgen Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, translated by Thomas McCarthy in two volumes (Cambridge: Polity, 1984–1987 [first published in German in 1981]).Google Scholar
  36. 48.
    Richard Lebow, “Power, Persuasion and Justice,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33, no. 3 (2005): 551–581, at p. 572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sook Jong Lee and Jan Melissen 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yong Wook Lee

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations