The Theory and Reality of Soft Power: Practical Approaches in East Asia

  • Shin-Wha Lee
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy book series (GPD)


Soft power has been referred to as a form of national power that is based on ideational and cultural attractiveness, which is intentionally or unintentionally utilized by actors in international relations to achieve strategic imperatives.1 Soft power also constitutes more than mere cultural power and includes political values and ideas, educational and socioeconomic systems, and legitimate national policies as accepted by other nations and people.2 When other countries are persuaded that a nation’s ideals or policies are legitimate, indeed desirable, then the “soft power” of that nation is increased.3 As a theoretical concept, soft power means taking on increasing importance and relevance. Many countries have recognized the significance of using soft power tools and resources to engage in competitive politics of attraction, legitimacy, and credibility. This is because compatibility with other nations’ values and interests can be as important as the exercise of hard power to achieve a nation’s desired objectives.


Foreign Policy Power Resource Soft Power Official Development Assistance Public Diplomacy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Joseph S. Nye, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: PublicAffairs, 2004)Google Scholar
  2. Gregory F. Treverton and Seth G. Jones, Measuring National Power, Rand National Security Research Division Conference Proceedings (Santa Monica CA: RAND Corporation, 2005), p. 17.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Watanabe Yasushi and David McConnell, Soft Power Superpowers: Cultural and National Assets of Japan and the United States (New York: M.E. Sharpe, 2008).Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Joshua Kurlantzick, Charm Offensive: How China s Soft Power is Transforming the World (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Tsuneo Akaha, Soft Power in Japan s Security Policy: Implications for Alliance with the United States, Pacific Focus, 59–91, no. 1, spring (2005).Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Peter Digester, The Fourth Face of Power, The Journal of Politics, 54, no. 4 (1992).Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    E.H. Carr, The Twenty Years Crisis, 1919 1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1939).Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations, 3rd ed. (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1960), pp. 158–163 and 227–271.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics (Reading MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979).Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Kenneth Boulding, Three Faces of Power (London: Sage, 1989), p. 29.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Touchstone, 1996).Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    Brantly Womack, Dancing Alone: A Hard Look at Soft Power, Japan Focus, November 16. 2005. Available online at Scholar
  13. 15.
    Playing Soft or Hard Cop, The Economist, January 19, 2006.Google Scholar
  14. 16.
    Richard Armitage and Joseph S. Nye, CSIS Commission on Smart Power: A Smarter, More Secure America, November 6, 2007. Available online at pubs/071106_csissmartpowerreport.pdfGoogle Scholar
  15. 17.
    Joseph S. Nye, The Powers to Lead (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), preface, p. ix–xiii.Google Scholar
  16. 21.
    Peter J. Katzenstein (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
  17. Janice Bially Mattern, Why Soft Power isn t So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33, no. 3, June (2005).Google Scholar
  18. 22.
    Global Affairs and Asia Society, The United States and the Rise of China and India: Results of a 2006 Multinational Survey of Public Opinion (Chicago IL: Chicago Council on Global Affairs, 2006)Google Scholar
  19. CCGA, Soft Power in Asia: Results of a 2008 Multinational Survey of Public Opinion (Chicago IL: Chicago Council on Global Affairs, 2008).Google Scholar
  20. 27.
    Ogoura Kazuo, The Limits of Soft Power [Sofuto Pawa ron no shikaku], Wochi Kochi, June/ July 2006, pp. 60 65.Google Scholar
  21. 29.
    David McConnell and Watanabe Yasushi, Soft Power Superpowers: Cultural and National Assets of Japan and the United States (New York: M.E. Sharpe, 2008).Google Scholar
  22. 32.
    Gilbert Rozman and Shin-wha Lee, Unravelling the Japan South Korea Virtual Alliance, Asian Survey, XLVI, no. 5, September/October (2006).Google Scholar
  23. 33.
    Yul Sohn, Japan s Soft Power, Making an Attractive Nation: Future Strategy of Soft Power [Maeryokkukga Mandulgi, in Korean], Peace Forum, 21, no. 2, summer (2005).Google Scholar
  24. 34.
    Kazuo Ogura, Japan s New Cultural Diplomacy: A Personal View with a Historical Perspective, International House of Japan Bulletin, 24, no. 2, autumn (2004).Google Scholar
  25. 35.
    Gilbert Rozman, Japanese Strategic Thinking on Regionalism, in Gilbert Rozman, Kazuhiko Togo, and Joseph P. Ferguson (eds.), Japanese Strategic Thought toward Asia (New York: Palgrave, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 36.
    Toyoo Gyohten, Japan s Soft Power Reconsidered, Global Communications Platform (GLOCOM), August 30, 2004, available online at essays/20040830_gyohten_japan/index.html.Google Scholar
  27. 37.
    Leif-Eric Easley, Seoul and Beijing s Embrace of Soft Power, November 10, 2007, available online at menu=A11100& no=380929&rel_no=l&back_url=.Google Scholar
  28. 39.
    Gilbert Rozman, In-taek Hyun and Shin-wha Lee (eds.), South Korean Strategic Thought toward Asia (New York: Palgrave, 2008).Google Scholar
  29. 40.
    Tong Kim, Lee Myung-bak s Foreign Policy, The Korea Times, December 2, 2007.Google Scholar
  30. 43.
    Hae-jeong Cho, Reading the Korean Wave as a Sign of Global Shift, Korea Journal 45, no. 4, Winter 2005: 160.Google Scholar
  31. 46.
    Jan Melissen, Korea Needs Public Diplomacy Strategy, an interview with The Korea Times, February 13, 2008, available online at special/2008/ll/178_18885.htmlGoogle Scholar
  32. Jan Melissen, The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations (London and New York: Palgrave, 2006).Google Scholar
  33. 47.
    Yiwei Wang, Public Diplomacy and the Rise of Chinese Soft Power, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616, no. 1, March (2008): 257–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 49.
    Joshua Cooper Ramo, Beijing Consensus, The Foreign Policy Center, 2004, available online at Scholar
  35. Young-nam Cho and Jong-ho Jeong, China s Soft Power: Discussions, Resources and Prospects, Asian Survey XLVIII, no. 3. May/June (2008).Google Scholar
  36. 50.
    China s Charm Offensive, Los Angeles Times, June 23, 2007, available online at,0,7036919. story?coll=a-news-comment-opinions.Google Scholar
  37. 53.
    Drew Thompson, China s Soft Power in Africa: From the Beijing Consensus to Health Diplomacy, Asian Media Archives, October 13, 2005, available online at Scholar
  38. 55.
    Stephen Marks, China in Africa: The New Imperialism?, March 2, 2006, available online at Scholar
  39. 58.
    Joseph S. Nye, Asia s Hardening Soft Power, Taipei Times, November 17, 2005, available online at Scholar
  40. 59.
    Bruce Klingner, China Shock for South Korea, Asia Times, September 11, 2004, available online at Scholar
  41. 64.
    William Middlebrooks, Beyond Pacifism: Why Japan Must Become a Normal Nation (Westport CT: Praeger Security International, 2008).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sook Jong Lee and Jan Melissen 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shin-Wha Lee

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations