Advertisement

Conclusion: Need for Moderation and a Humane Approach

  • Rohan Gunaratna
  • Arabinda Acharya
  • Wang Pengxin

Abstract

In multiethnic, multinational societies, minority concerns over their share in the political space, control over resources and protection of their identities (religious, linguistic) often contribute to political conflicts.2 There is also a strong and positive correlation between ethnic conflict and ethnic nepotism measured by ethnic heterogeneity3 as with religious polarization and the risk of internal conflict.4 Minority grievances over the lack of political and civil rights, income inequality, and social fragmentation are especially conducive to internal unrest including civic strife and insurgency. With religious polarization, conflicts tend to get protracted as there could be a perception that the conflicting issues are indivisible and hence not amenable to settlement through negotiations.5 It is in this lens that the terrorist threat in China needs to be viewed. Undoubtedly, like many conflicts in other parts of world, the conflict involving Muslims in China is rooted in issues of national self-determination of a minority population. However, this is increasingly being overshadowed by religious undertones. Thus, today, the real threat stems not so much from Uighur nationalism but from their religiosity which unfortunately is under the influence of the ideology of global jihad.

Keywords

Terrorist Threat Separatist Force Transnational Terrorism Muslim Minority Muslim Identity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    T.R. Gurr, People versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century (Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    T. Vanham, “Domestic Ethnic Conflict and Etnic Nepotism: a Comparative Analysis,” Journal of peace Research, Vol. 36 (1999): 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 4.
    M. Reynal- Querol, “Ethnicity, Political Systems and Civil Wars,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 46 (2002): 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 5.
    Isak Svensson, Fighting with Faith: Religion and Conflict Resolution in Civil Wars, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 51, No. 6 (December 2007): 930–949.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Kelvin Siqueria and Todd Sandler, “Terrorists versus the Government: Strategic Interaction, Support and Sponsorship,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 50, No. 6 (December 2006): 878–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 7.
    K. J. Holsti, The State, War and the State of War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 8.
    S.C. Poe, C. N. Tate and D. Lanier, “Domestic Threats: the Abuse of Personal Integrity,” in Paths to State Repression: Human Rights Violations and Contentious Politics, ed. C. Davenport (Latham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000).Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    Nicolas Becquelin, “Staged Development in Xinjiang,” China Quarterly, No. 178 (2008), 358–78.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    Nicolas Becquelin, “Staged Development in Xinjiang,” China Quarterly, No. 178 (2008), 358–78.Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    Amon N. Guiora, Global Perspectives on Counterterrorism (Aspen Publishers, 2007), 19.Google Scholar
  11. 18.
    Wu Xinbo, “China: Security Practice of a Modernizing and Ascending Power,” in Asian Security Practice: Material and Ideational Influences, ed. Muthiah Alagappa (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998), 131.Google Scholar
  12. 19.
    Kung Lap-Yan, “National Identity and Ethno-religious Identity,” A Critical Enquiry into Chinese Religious Policy with Reference to Uighurs in Xinjiang,” Religion, State and Society, Vol. 34, No. 4 (2006): 375–391.Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    Ishaan Tharoor, “Tearing Down Old Kashgar: Another Blow to the Uighurs,” Time (July 29, 2009). http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1913166,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
  14. 22.
    Sofia Jamil and Roderick Chia, “Lifting the Lid OffXinjiang’s Insecurities,” NTS Insight (Singapore S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, September 2008), 7–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rohan Gunaratna, Arabinda Acharya and Wang Pengxin 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rohan Gunaratna
  • Arabinda Acharya
  • Wang Pengxin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations