Advertisement

The Task Is Greater Than the Title: Professionalising the Role of the Senior Investigating Officer in Homicide Investigations

  • Declan Donnelly
  • Adrian West
Chapter

Abstract

The authors argue that the Police should acknowledge that the basic premise of a professional organisation lies in having an appropriate corpus of professional knowledge. The attainment of knowledge as a necessary foundation for the discipline and practice of investigation requires a radical change to the current training and development of investigators. The development of Senior Investigating Officers (SIO) expertise should be recognised as requiring the summation of relevant theoretical and conceptual domain knowledge, enhanced decision-making skills and the accumulation of investigative experience that allows ready access to conceptual and practical models for action. An understanding of how other disciplines can assist the investigative process requires more than a superficial familiarity with their methods. The emphasis should be on the acquisition of critical thinking and complex problem-solving skills.

Keywords

The influence of the practices of the past The acquisition of knowledge ‘Good coppering’ versus human factors Sense making Investigative expertise Investigative theory 

References

  1. ACPO. (2005a). Guidance on Major Incident Room Standardised Administrative Procedures (MIRSAP). Wyboston: NPIA.Google Scholar
  2. ACPO. (2005b). Practice Advice on Core Investigative Doctrine. Wyboston: NPIA.Google Scholar
  3. ACPO. (2006). Murder Investigation Manual. Wyboston: NPIA.Google Scholar
  4. Adhami, E., & Browne, D. P. (1996). Major Crime Enquiries: Improving Expert Support for Detectives (Home Office Police Research Group Special Interest Series Paper 9). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  5. Alison, L., Doran, B., Long, M., Power, N., & Humphrey, A. (2013). The Effects of Subjective Time Pressures and Individual Differences on Hypotheses Generation and Action Prioritisation in Police Investigations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19(1), 83–93.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alys, L., Massey, K., & Tong, S. (2013). Investigative Decision Making: Missing People and Sexual Offences, Crossroads to an Uncertain Future. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 10(2), 140–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and Deciding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brookman, F. (2005). Understanding Homicide. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Brookman, F., & Innes, M. (2013). The Problem of Success: What Is a ‘Good’ Homicide Investigation? Policing & Society, 23(3), 292–310.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.771538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruhns, J. (1982). Police and Homicides. In L. Danto, J. Bruhns, & A. H. Kutscher (Eds.), The Human Side of Homicide. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bryant, R. P. (2009) Theories of Investigation. In S. Tong, R. P. Bryant, & M. Horvath (Eds.), Understanding Criminal Investigation (pp. 13–35). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Byford, L. (1981). The Yorkshire Ripper Case: Review of the Police Investigation of the Case by Lawrence Byford, Esq., CBE., QPM., Her Majesty’s Inspector of Constabulary. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  13. Carson, D. (2007). Models of Investigation. In T. Newburn, T. Williamson, & A. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of Criminal Investigations (pp. 407–425). London: Willan.Google Scholar
  14. Carson, D. (2009). Detecting, Developing and Disseminating Detectives’ “Creative” Skills. Policing and Society, 19(3), 216–225.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460902871322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carson, D. (2013). Investigations: What Could, and Should, Be Taught. The Police Journal, 86, 249–275.  https://doi.org/10.1350/pojo.2013.86.3.628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook, T., & Tattersall, A. (2016). Senior Investigating Officers’ Handbook (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dawid, P., Twining, W., & Vasilaki, M. (Eds.). (2011). Evidence, Inference and Enquiry. In Proceedings of the British Academy 171. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dean, G., Fahsing, I. A., & Gottschalk, P. (2006). Profiling Police Investigative Thinking: A Study of Police Officers in Norway. International Journal of the Sociology of Law [e-journal], 34(4), 221–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsl.2006.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. du Rose, J. (1971). Murder Was My Business. London: W. H. Allen.Google Scholar
  20. Ericsson, K. A. (2006). An Introduction to the Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance: Its Development, Organisation and Content. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ericsson, K. A., Prietula, M. J., & Cokely, E. T. (2007). The Making of an Expert. Harvard Business Review, 85(7–8), 114–121.Google Scholar
  22. Fahsing, I., & Ask, K. (2013). Decision Making and Decisional Tipping Points in Homicide Investigations: An Interview Study of British and Norwegian Detectives. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 10, 155–165.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fahsing, I., & Ask, K. (2016). The Making of an Expert Detective: The Role of Experience in English and Norwegian Police Officer’s Investigative Decision Making. Psychology Crime & Law, 22(3), 203–223.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2015.1077249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flanagan, Sir R. (2004). A Report on the Investigation by Cambridgeshire Constabulary into the Murder of Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells at Soham on 4 August 2002: Summary of Conclusions and Recommendations. London: HMIC.Google Scholar
  25. Forbes, I. (1973). Squad Man. London: W. H. Allen.Google Scholar
  26. HMIC. (2017). PEEL: Police Effectiveness: A National Overview. London: HMIC.Google Scholar
  27. Hobbs, D. (1988). Doing the Business: Entrepreneurship, Detectives’s and the Working Class in the East End of London. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Innes, M. (2002a). Organisational Communication and the Symbolic Construction of Police Murder Investigations. British Journal of Sociology, 53(1), 67–87.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310120109339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Innes, M. (2002b). The ‘Process Structures’ of Police Homicide Investigations. The British Journal of Criminology, 42, 669–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Innes, M. (2003). Investigating Murder: Detective Work and the Police Response to Criminal Homicide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Innes, M. (2007). Investigation Order and Major Crime Inquiries. In T. Newburn, T. Williamson, & A. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of Criminal Investigations (pp. 255–277). London: Willan.Google Scholar
  32. Irving, B., & Dunnighan, C. (1993). Human Factors in the Quality Control of CID Investigations. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  33. Irving, B., & McKenzie, I. (1993). A Brief Review of Relevant Police Training. In The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice: Human Factors in the Quality Control of CID Investigations (pp. 77–100). Research Study No 21. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  34. James, A., & Mills, M. (2012). Does ACPO Know Best: To What Extent May the PIP Programme Provide a Template for the Professionalising of Policing? The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles, 85(2), 133–149.  https://doi.org/10.1350/pojo.2012.85.2.587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kassin, S. M. (2012). Why Confessions Trump Innocence. American Psychological Association, 67(6), 431–445.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kind, S. (1987). The Scientific Investigation of Crime. Manchester, UK: Forensic Science Services Limited.Google Scholar
  37. Klein, G. (1998). Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Leo, R. A. (2008). Police Interrogation and American Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Macpherson, Sir W. M. (1999). The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  40. Maguire, M. (2008). Criminal Investigation and Crime Control. In T. Newburn (Ed.), Handbook of Policing (pp. 430–464). London. Willan.Google Scholar
  41. Mark, Sir, R. (1978). In the Office of Constable. London: William Collins & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  42. Neyroud, P., & Disley, E. (2007). The Management, Supervision and Oversight of Criminal Investigations. In T. Newburn, T. Williamson, & A. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of Criminal Investigation (pp. 549–572). London: Willan.Google Scholar
  43. Oughton, F. (1971). Murder Investigation. London: Elek Books Limited.Google Scholar
  44. Powis, D. (1977). The Signs of Crime: A Field Manual for Police. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  45. Riener, R. (2010). The Politics of the Police (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Roycroft, M., Brown, J., & Innes, M. (2007). Reform by Crisis: The Murder of Stephen Lawrence and Socio-Historical Analysis of Developments in the Conduct of Major Crime Investigations. In M. Rowe (Ed.), Policing Beyond MacPherson: Issues in Policing, Race and Society (pp. 148–164). Cullompton, Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
  47. Runciman, Viscount of Doxford. (1993). The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice. London. HMSO (Cm 2263).Google Scholar
  48. Savage, S. P., & Milne, B. (2007). Miscarriages of Justice. In T. Newburn, T. Williamson, & A. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of Criminal Investigation (pp. 610–628). London: Willan.Google Scholar
  49. Schon, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  50. Sentamu, Rt Revd. J., Blakey, D., & Nove, P. (2002). The Damilola Taylor Murder Investigation Review: The Report of the Oversight Panel. Presented to Sir John Stevens QPM DL Commissioner of the Metropolis, December 2002.Google Scholar
  51. Simon, D. (2012). In Doubt: The Psychology of the Criminal Justice System. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, D. J. (2003). The Shipman Inquiry Second Report: The Police Investigation of March 1998. London. HMSO.Google Scholar
  53. Smith, N., & Flanagan, C. (2000). The Effective Detective: Identifying the Skills of an Effective SIO (Police Research Series Paper No. 122). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  54. Stead, P. J. (1977). Preface. In D. Powis (Ed.), The Signs of Crime: A Field Manual for Police. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  55. Stelfox, P. (2007). Professionalising Criminal Investigation. In T. Newburn, T. Williamson, & A. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of Criminal Investigations (pp. 628–651). London: Willan.Google Scholar
  56. Stelfox, P. (2009). Criminal Investigation: An Introduction to Principles and Practice. Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
  57. Stelfox, P., & Pease, K. (2005). Cognition and Detection: Reluctant Bedfellows? In N. J. Smith & N. Tilley (Eds.), Crime Science: New Approaches to Preventing and Detecting Crime (pp. 191–207). Cullopmton, Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
  58. Tate, T., & Wyre, R. (1992). Murder Squad. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  59. Tong, S. (2009). Professionalising Investigation. In S. Tong, R. P. Bryant, & M. Horvath (Eds.), Understanding Criminal Investigation (pp. 197–214). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Tong, S., Bryant, R. P., & Horvath, M. (2009). Understanding Criminal Investigation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  61. West, A. (2001). A Proposal for an Investigative Science Course: Any Takers? Police Research and Management, 5, 13–22.Google Scholar
  62. West, A., & Alison, L. (2005). Conclusions: Personal Reflections on the Last Decade. In L. Alison (Ed.), The Forensic Psychologists Casebook: Psychological Profiling and Criminal Investigation (pp. 380–392). Cullompton, Devon: Willan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Declan Donnelly
    • 1
  • Adrian West
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social SciencesAnglia Ruskin UniversityCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Liverpool Centre for Advanced Policing StudiesLiverpool John Moore’s UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations