Advertisement

Pronouns in Literary Fiction as Inventive Discourse

  • Henrik Skov Nielsen
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter approaches the question of pronouns from a rhetorical perspective, focusing on literary fiction as inventive discourse. Standard models of pronouns, especially linguistic ones, are based on non-inventive language uses. In the rhetorical approach, it becomes evident that parts of the grammar of literary fiction work differently from non-fictional conversational discourse. Focusing on pronouns, the chapter argues that it is a mistake to impose real-world, non-invented, narrative situations on fictional narratives. Having presented the semiotic framework of Charles Sanders Peirce, I offer a new reading of his ‘concept of’ the indexical sign in order to examine deictic and personal pronouns in literature.

Outside fiction in, say, conversational narratives, the referent of you is inevitably addressed. In most fictional second-person narratives, the referent of you is instead inevitably created, an argument also applicable to first-person narratives. Thus, in light of such unnatural pronoun usage, it is possible to speak of instances in which a fictional narrative foregrounds its own inventive powers and resistance to real-world descriptions.

Keywords

Charles Sanders Peirce Fictionality Literary fiction as invented discourse Rhetoric The unnatural 

References

  1. Barthes, R. (1972) ‘To Write: An Intransitive Verb?’, in Macksey, R. and Donato, E. (eds.) The Structuralist Controversy, Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 134–144.Google Scholar
  2. Hamburger, K. (1957) Die Logik der Dichtung, Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. Jakobson, R. (1990) Shifters and Verbal Categories, in R. Jakobson (ed.), On Language, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Jakobson, R. (1996 [1987]) Language in Literature, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Kjærstad, J. (1999) Oppdageren, Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
  6. Lyons, J, (1977) Semantics, Vols I and II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Nielsen, H. S. (2004) ‘The Impersonal Voice in First-Person Narrative Fiction’ Narrative 12(2): 133–150.Google Scholar
  8. Nielsen, H. S. (2011) ‘Fictional Voices? Strange Voices? Unnatural Voices?’, in Hansen, P. Krogh, Iverson, S., Nielsen, H. Skov, and Reitan, R. (eds.) Strange Voices in Narrative Fiction, Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 55–82.Google Scholar
  9. Nielsen, H. S., Phelan, J. and Walsh, R. (2015) ‘Ten Theses about Fictionality’, Narrative 23(1): 61–73.Google Scholar
  10. Niklas, U. (1984) ‘The Type-Token Distinction in Peirce’, in Pelc, J., Sebeok, T. A., Stankiewicz, E., and Winner, T. G. (eds.) Sign, System and Function, Berlin: Mouton Publishers, pp. 231–239.Google Scholar
  11. O’Brien, F. (1967) The Third Policeman. New York: Walker and Company.Google Scholar
  12. Peirce, C. S. (1960) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, volume II, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Phelan, J. (2011) ‘Rhetoric, Ethics, and Narrative Communication: Or, from Story and Discourse to Authors, Resources, and Audiences’, Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 94(1/2): 55–75.Google Scholar
  14. Walsh, R. (2007) The Rhetoric of Fictionality, Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Walsh, R. (2016) ‘The Fictive Reflex: A Fresh Look at Reflexiveness and Narrative Representation’, Neohelicon 43(2): 379–389.Google Scholar
  16. Waugh, L. R. (1984) ‘Some Remarks on the Nature of the Linguistic Sign’ in Pelc, J., Sebeok, T. A., Stankiewicz, E., and Winner, T. G. (eds.) Sign, System and Function, Berlin: Mouton Publishers, pp. 389–438.Google Scholar
  17. Zetterberg Gjerlevsen, S. (2016a) ‘A Novel History of Fictionality’, Narrative 24(2): 174–189.Google Scholar
  18. Zetterberg Gjerlevsen, S. (2016b) ‘Fictionality’, The Living Handbook of Narratology: http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/fictionality
  19. Zetterberg Gjerlevsen, S. and Nielsen, H. S. (forthcoming) “Distinguishing Fictionality”, in Maagaard, C., Lundholt, M. W., and Schäbler, D. (eds.) Fictionality and Factuality: Blurred Borders in Narrations of Identity, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henrik Skov Nielsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations