Advertisement

Qualitative and Quantitative Trends in the Assessment of Subjective Temporality

  • Victor E. C. Ortuño
  • Maria Paula Paixão
  • Isabel Nunes Janeiro
Chapter

Abstract

Research on time perspective (TP) has struggled with several conceptual and methodological problems. One of the consistently identified shortcomings is the scarcity of reliable psychological assessment instruments. In this chapter, the authors provide a critical analysis concerning the methodological evolution of the assessment of the subjective temporality, and briefly describe some of the most representative measures. While most assessment efforts were initially set on the use of qualitative procedures, current research studies and conceptual developments are mainly founded on the use of quantitative assessment instruments providing several measurement indicators. There are, however, some remaining issues that must be addressed concerning the construction and development of innovative assessment procedures used in the understanding of the impact of subjective temporality constructs on individual and social behavior.

References

  1. Aspinwall, L. G. (2011). Future-oriented thinking, proactive coping, and the management of potential threats to health and well-being. In S. Folkman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health and coping (pp. 334–365). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boniwell, I., Osin, E., Linley, P. A., & Ivanchenko, G. V. (2010). A question of balance: Time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing one’s time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 165–178). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Bouffard, L., Lapierre, S., & Bastin, E. (1989). Extension Temporelle des Projects Personnels au Cours de la Vieillesse [Temporal extension of the personal projects and aging course]. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 265–291.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carelli, M. G., Wiberg, B., & Wiberg, M. (2011). Development and construct validation of the Swedish Zimbardo time perspective inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 220–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cottle, T. J. (1976). Perceiving time: A psychological investigation with men and women. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Cottle, T. J., & Klineberg, S. L. (1974). The present of things future: Explorations of time in human experience. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. De Volder, M. L., & Lens, W. (1982). Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive-motivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(3), 566–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Desmmyter, F., & De Raedt, R. (2012). The relationship between time perspective and subjective well-being of older adults. Psychologica Belgica, 52(1), 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dias, M. (2009). Em Busca do Tempo Construído: Contributos da Perspectiva Diacrónica [In search for the constructed time: A diachronic perspective contribute]. Portugal: Editorial Novembro.Google Scholar
  11. Dorr, N., Krueckeberg, S., Strathman, A., & Wood, M. D. (1999). Psychosocial correlates of voluntary HIV antibody testing in college students. AIDS Education and Prevention, 11, 14–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Drake, L., Duncan, E., Sutherland, F., Abernethy, C., & Henry, C. (2008). Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time & Society, 17(1), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frank, L. K. (1939). Time perspectives. Journal of Social Philosophy, 4, 293–312.Google Scholar
  14. Gjesme, T. (1979). Future time orientation as a function of achievement motives, ability, delay of gratification, and sex. The Journal of Psychology, 101(2), 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gjesme, T. (1983). On the concept of future time orientation: Considerations of some functions´ and measurements´ implications. International Journal of Psychology, 18, 443–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamilton, J. M., Kives, K. D., Micevski, V., & Grace, S. L. (2003). Time perspective and health-promoting behavior in a cardiac rehabilitation population. Behavioral Medicine, 28(4), 132–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Heatherton, T. F., & Wyland, C. L. (2003). Assessing self-esteem. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment. A handbook of models and measures (pp. 219–233). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holman, E. A., & Silver, R. C. (2005). Future-oriented thinking and adjustment in a nationwide longitudinal study following the September 11th terrorist attacks. Motivation and Emotion, 29(4), 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Husman, J., & Shell, D. F. (2008). Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 166–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Irving, L. M., Crenshaw, W., Snyder, C. R., Francis, P., & Gentry, G. (1990, May). Hope and its correlates in a psychiatric inpatient setting. Paper presented at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  21. Janeiro, I., Bardagi, M., Teixeira, M., & Ortuño, V. (2016, July). Psychometric properties of the ITP: Evidence from two culturally different samples. Communication presented at the 31st International Congress of Psychology, Yokohama, Japan.Google Scholar
  22. Janeiro, I. N. (2012). O Inventário de Perspectiva Temporal: Estudo de validação [The time perspective inventory: Validation study]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico e Avaliação Psicológica, 34, 117–133.Google Scholar
  23. Joireman, J. (2005). Environmental problems as social dilemmas: The temporal dimension. In A. Strathman & J. Joireman (Eds.), Understanding behavior in the context of time: Theory, research, and application (pp. 289–304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Joireman, J., Balliet, D., Sprott, D., Spangenberg, E., & Schultz, J. (2008). Consideration of future consequences, ego-depletion, and self-control: Support for distinguishing between CFC-immediate and CFC-future sub-scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Joireman, J., Daniels, D., George-Falvy, J., & Kamdar, D. (2006). Organizational citizenship behaviors as a function of empathy, consideration of future consequences, and employee time horizon: An initial exploration using an in-basket simulation of OCBs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2266–2292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Joireman, J., Kamdar, D., Daniels, D., & Duell, B. (2006). Good citizens to the end? It depends: Empathy and concern with future consequences moderate the impact of a short-term time horizon on OCBs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1307–1320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1272–1287.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Joireman, J., Strathman, A., & Balliet, D. (2006). Considering future consequences: An integrative model. In L. Sanna & E. Chang (Eds.), Judgments over time: The interplay of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors (pp. 82–99). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Joireman, J. A., Lasane, T. P., Bennett, J., Richards, D., & Solaimani, S. (2001). Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 133–155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Joireman, J. A., Van Lange, P. A. M., & Van Vugt, M. (2004). Who cares about the environmental impact of cars? Those with an eye toward the future. Environment and Behavior, 36, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kant, I. (1997). Crítica da razão pura [Critique of pure reason] (A. Morão, Trans.). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. (Original Work Published in 1781).Google Scholar
  32. Kastenbaum, R. (1961). The dimensions of future time perspective, an experimental analysis. The Journal of General Psychology, 65(2), 203–218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kazakina, E. (2013). Time perspective of older adults: Research and clinical practice. In M. P. Paixão, J. T. da Silva, V. Ortuño, & P. Cordeiro (Eds.), International studies on time perspective (pp. 71–86). Coimbra: University of Coimbra Press.  10.13140/RG.2.1.1602.0008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knapp, J. H., & Garbutt, J. T. (1958). Time imagery and the achievement motive. Journal of Personality, 26, 426–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lasane, T. P., & O’Donnell, D. A. (2005). Time orientation measurement: A conceptual approach. In A. Strathman & J. Joireman (Eds.), Understanding behavior in the context of time. Theory, research and application (pp. 11–30). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Lennings, C. J. (1994). An investigation of the effects of agency and time perspective variables on career maturity. The Journal of Psychology, 128(3), 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lens, W. (1986). Future time perspective: A cognitive-motivational concept. In D. R. Brown & J. Veroff (Eds.), Frontiers of motivational psychology. Esssays in honour of John Atkinson (pp. 173–190). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lewin, K. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. American Journal of Sociology, 44(6), 868–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewin, K. (1942). Field theory of learning. Yearbook of the National Society for the study of Education, 41(part 2), 215–242.Google Scholar
  40. Lewin, K. (1943). Defining the field at a given time. Psychological Review, 50(3), 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lindsay, J. J., & Strathman, A. (1997). Predictors of recycling behavior: An application of a modified health belief model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1799–1823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marques, S. C., Pais-Ribeiro, J. L., & Lopez, S. J. (2009). Validation of a Portuguese version of the children hope scale. School Psychology International, 30, 538–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marques, S. C., Pais-Ribeiro, J. L., & Lopez, S. J. (2011). “Building hope for the future”: A program to Foster strengths in middle-school students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McGrath, J., & Kelly, J. (1986). Time and human interaction: Towards a social psychology of time. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  45. McKay, M. T., Worrell, F. C., Temple, E. C., Perry, J., Cole, J. C., & Mello, Z. R. (2015). Less is not always more: The case of the 36-item short form of the Zimbardo time perspective inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mello, Z. R., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). The adolescent time inventory: Technical manual (version 3). San Francisco, CA: Authors.Google Scholar
  47. Melo, V., & Pais-Ribeiro, J. (2010). Relação entre Optimismo, Esperança e Bem-Estar Subjectivo com o Medo do Cancro da Mama em Estudantes Universitárias [Relation between optimism, hope and subjective well-being with breast cancer fear in university students]. In I. Leal, J. Pais-Ribeiro, M. Marques, & F. Pimenta (Eds.), Proceedings of 8° Congresso Nacional de Psicologia da Saúde: Saúde, sexualidade e género (pp. 927–934). Lisboa: Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada.Google Scholar
  48. Nurmi, J. E. (1991). How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Developmental Review, 11, 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nuttin, J., & Lens, W. (1985). Future time perspective and motivation: Theory and research method. Belgium: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Ortuño, V. (2014). Time perspective stability: Studies with a multidmensional model in the university context. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.Google Scholar
  51. Ortuño, V., Gomes, C., Vásquez, A., Belo, P., Imaginário, S., Paixão, M. P., & Janeiro, I. (2013). Satisfaction with life and college social integration: A time perspective multiple regression model. In M. P. Paixão, J. T. da Silva, V. Ortuño, & P. Cordeiro (Eds.), International studies on time perspective (pp. 101–106). Coimbra: University of Coimbra Press.  10.13140/RG.2.1.1602.0008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ortuño, V., Janeiro, I., Paixão, M. P., Esteves, C., & Cordeiro, P. (2018). Um novo modelo multidimensional da Perspectiva Temporal [A new multidimensional model of time perspective]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnostico y Evaluación Psicologica, 45(1).Google Scholar
  53. Ortuño, V., & Vásquez, A. (2013). Time perspective and self-esteem: Negative temporality affects the way we judge ourselves. Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Psychologica, VI, 109–125.Google Scholar
  54. Ortuño, V. E., & Janeiro, I. N. (2009). Estudo Comparativo de duas medidas de Perspectiva temporal: IPT & ZTPI em foco [Comparative study of two measures of time perspective: IPT & ZTPI in focus]. In Proceedings of X Congresso Internacional Galego-Português de Psicopedagogia. Braga: Universidade do Minho.Google Scholar
  55. Ortuño, V. E., & Janeiro, I. N. (2010). Análise das Diferenças na Perspectiva Temporal em Vários Grupos Etários através do IPT e do ZTPI [Analysis of the differences on time perspective in several age groups through the IPT and the ZTPI]. In C. Nogueira, I. Silva, L. Lima, A. T. Almeida, R. Cabecinhas, R. Gomes, C. Machado, A. Maia, A. Sampaio, & M. C. Taveira (Eds.), Proceedings of VII Simpósio Nacional de Investigação em Psicologia (pp. 35–46). Braga: Universidade do Minho.Google Scholar
  56. Ortuño, V. E., Paixão, M. P., & Janeiro, I. (2011). Tempo e Universidade: A Evolução da Perspectiva Temporal ao Longo do Percurso Universitário [Time and university: Time perspective’s evolution along the university course]. In L. Faria, A. Araújo, F. Morais, E. Sá, J. Pinto, & A. Silva (Eds.), Carreira, Criatividade e Empreendedorismo (pp. 217–225). Braga: APDC Edições.Google Scholar
  57. Ouellette, J. A., Hessling, R., Gibbons, F. X., Reis-Bergan, M., & Gerrard, M. (2005). Using images to increase exercise behavior: Prototypes versus possible selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 610–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271589 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Pais-Ribeiro, J., Pedro, L., & Marques, S. (2006). Contribuição para o estudo psicométrico e estrutural da escala de esperança (de futuro) [Contributes for the psychometric and structural study of the future scale of hope]. In I. Leal, J. Pais-Ribeiro, & S. Neves (Eds.), Proceedings of 6° Congresso Nacional de Psicologia da Saúde (pp. 75–81). Lisboa: ISPA.Google Scholar
  59. Paixão, M. P. (1996). Organização da Vivência do Futuro e Comportamento de Planificação. Compreensão dos Processos Motivacionais e Cognitivos na Elaboração e Avaliação de Projectos Pessoais [The organization of the subjective future and planning behavior. Comprehension of the motivational and cognitive processes involved in the elaboration and evaluation of personal projects]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Coimbra, Portugal.Google Scholar
  60. Paixão, M. P., Abreu, M. V., & Lens, W. (2012). Motivation, future time perspective and vocational planning behavior. In D. Leontiev (Ed.), Motivation, consciousness, and self-regulation (pp. 41–63). NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  61. Petrocelli, J. V. (2003). Factor validation of the consideration of future consequences scale: Evidence for a short version. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(4), 405–413.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Phan, H. P. (2009, November). Examination of time perspective, hope, self-efficacy, and ethnic identity: A structural equation model. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  63. Phan, H. P. (2013). Examination of self-efficacy and hope: A developmental approach using latent growth modeling. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Piaget, J. (1977). Problemas de Psicologia Genética [Genetic psychology problems]. Lisboa: Publicações Dom Quixote. (Original work published in 1972).Google Scholar
  65. Piaget, J. (1986). A Epistemologia Genética [The genetic epistemology]. Lisboa: Moraes Editores. (Original work published in 1979).Google Scholar
  66. Rand, K. L. (2009). Hope and optimism: Latent structures and influences on grade expectancy and academic performance. Journal of Personality, 77(1), 231–260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Rappaport, H., Enrich, K., & Wilson, A. (1985). Relation between ego identity and temporal perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1609–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Seema, R., Baltin, A., & Sircova, A. (2014). Transcendental future—Is it a healty belief or a time perspective? The transcendental-future time perspective inventory (TTPI) in Estonian. Trames, 1, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Seginer, R. (2009). Future orientation: Developmental and ecological perspectives. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Shores, K., & Scott, D. (2007). The relationship of individual time perspective and recreation experience preferences. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(1), 28–59.Google Scholar
  72. Sircova, A., van de Vijver, F., Osin, E., Milfont, T., Fieulaine, N., Kislali-Erginbilgic, A., … 54 members of the International Time Perspective Research Project. (2014). A global look at time: A 24 country study of the equivalence of the Zimbardo time perspective inventory. SAGE Open, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013515686
  73. Snyder, C. R., Feldman, D. B., Shorey, H. S., & Rand, K. L. (2002). Hopeful choices: A school counselor’s guide to hope theory. Professional School Counseling, 5(5), 298–307.Google Scholar
  74. Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., … Harney, P. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570.Google Scholar
  75. Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, T. F., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, R. L. (1996). Development and validation of the state hope scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.321 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Stahl, M. (2012). An exploratory study on the relation between time perspective, positive mental health and psychological distress across the adult lifespan. Unpublished master dissertation, University of Twente, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  77. Stolarski, M., Matthews, G., Postek, S., Zimbardo, P. G., & Bitner, J. (2014). How we feel is a matter of time: Relationships between time perspectives and mood. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(4), 809–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stouthard, M. E. A., & Peetsma, T. T. D. (1999). Future-time perspective: Analysis of a facet-designed questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15(2), 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 299–351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Tong, E., Fredrickson, B., Chang, W., & Lim, Z. (2010). Re-examinig hope: The roles of agency thinking and pathways thinking. Cognition & Emotion, 24(7), 1207–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. van Beek, W., & Kairys, A. (2015). Time perspective and transcendental future thinking. In M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine, & W. van Beek (Eds.), Time perspective theory; Review, research and application (pp. 73–86). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  83. Vásquez, A. (2011). Experiencia subjetiva del tiempo y su influencia en el comportamiento: revision y modelos. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 27(2), 215–223.Google Scholar
  84. Vásquez, A., Esteves, C., Gomes, C., & Ortuño, V. (2015). Portuguese validation of the consideration of future consequences scale. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18, E7. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vázquez, S. M., & Rapetti, M. V. (2005). Future time perspective and motivational categories in Argentinean adolescents. Adolescence, 41(163), 511–532.Google Scholar
  86. Vowinckel, J. C., Westerhof, G. J., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Webster, J. D. (2015). Flourishing in the now: Initial validation of a present-eudaimonic time perspective scale. Time & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X15577277.
  87. Webster, J. D. (2011). A new measure of time perspective: Initial psychometric findings for the balanced time perspective scale (BTPS). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 43(2), 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wessman, A. E. (1973). Personality and the subjective experience of time. Journal of Personality Assessment, 37, 103–114.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Wohlford, P. (1966). Extension of personal time, affective states, and expectation of personal death. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 559–566.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Worrell, F. C., Me llo, Z. R., & Buhl, M. (2013). Introducing English and German versions of the Adolescent Time Attitude Scale (ATAS). Assessment, 4, 496–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110396202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zaleski, Z. (1996). Future anxiety: Concept, measurement, and preliminary research. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(2), 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zaleski, Z., Sobol-Kwapinska, M., Przepiorka, A., & Meisner, M. (2017). Development and validation of the dark future scale. Time & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X16678257.
  93. Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Stolarski, M. (2013). Comparing three methods to measure a balanced time perspective: The relationship between a balanced time perspective and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zimbardo, P., Sword, R., & Sword, R. (2012). The time cure: Overcoming PTSD with the new psychology of time perspective therapy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  95. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2008). The time paradox: Using the new psychology of time to your advantage. London: Rider.Google Scholar
  97. Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S. B. G., & Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 139–149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor E. C. Ortuño
    • 1
    • 2
  • Maria Paula Paixão
    • 2
  • Isabel Nunes Janeiro
    • 3
  1. 1.University of the RepublicMontevideoUruguay
  2. 2.University of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  3. 3.University of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations