Advertisement

Abstract

In this chapter, I overview current research issues in L2 pragmatic learning, instruction, and assessment. The chapter begins by discussing how pragmatic competence has been conceptualized under various theoretical and analytical frameworks and then examines the recent development of data collection methods in pragmatics research focusing on how pragmatic competence has been operationalized. Two example studies are discussed to illustrate the distinct data collection and analytical approaches in L2 pragmatics research. Along with the conceptual and methodological issues, the chapter offers a survey of research issues in pragmatic learning, instruction, and assessment, in each case synthesizing the research findings available across diverse contexts focusing on current research.

Keywords

Second language pragmatics Discourse completion tasks Role-plays Conversation analysis 

References

  1. Alcón-Soler, E. (2015). Pragmatic learning and study abroad: Effects of instruction and length of stay. System, 48, 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Gahtani, S., & Roever, C. (2012). Proficiency and sequential organization of L2 requests. Applied Linguistics, 33, 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Gahtani, S., & Roever, C. (2015). The development of requests by L2 learners of modern standard Arabic: A longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Foreign Language Annals, 48, 570–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). The interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49, 677–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2012). Formulas, routines, and conventional expressions in pragmatics research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 206–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2013). Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63, 68–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Griffin, R. (2005). L2 pragmatic awareness: Evidence from the ESL classroom. System, 30, 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. S. (Eds.). (2005). Interlanguage pragmatics: Exploring institutional talk. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Bella, S. (2012). Pragmatic development in a foreign language: A study of Greek FL requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1917–1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belz, J. A. (2007). The role of computer mediation in the instruction and development of L2 pragmatic competence. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. D. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crystal, D. (1997). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Eslami, Z. R., Mirzaei, A., & Dini, S. (2015). The role of asynchronous computer mediated communication in the instruction and development of EFL learners’ pragmatic competence. System, 48, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2010). Data collection methods in speech act performance: DCTs, role plays, and verbal reports. In E. Usó Juán & A. Martinex-Flor (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical, and methodological issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  16. Gass, S. M., & Houck, N. (1999). Interlanguage refusals: A cross-cultural study of Japanese-English. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
  17. Golato, A. (2003). Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics, 24, 90–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grabowski, K. (2009). Investigating the construct validity of a test designed to measure grammatical and pragmatic knowledge in the context of speaking. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  19. Hassall, T. (2015). Individual variation in L2 study-abroad outcomes: A case study from Indonesian pragmatics. Multilingua, 34, 33–59.Google Scholar
  20. Hudson, T., Detmer, E., & Brown, J. D. (1995). Developing prototypic measures of cross-cultural pragmatics (Technical Report #7). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
  21. Huth, T. (2010). Can talk be inconsequential? Social and interactional aspects of elicited second-language interaction. Modern Language Journal, 94, 537–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
  23. Jeon, E. H., & Kaya, T. (2006). Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development: A meta-analysis. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 165–211). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kasper, G. (2006). Speech acts in interaction: Towards discursive pragmatics. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, J. C. Félix-Brasdefer, & A. S. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 11, pp. 281–314). University of Hawai’i at Manoa, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
  25. Kasper, G. (2009). L2 pragmatic development. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), New handbook of second language acquisition. Leeds, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
  26. Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics: An introduction. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 3–17). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kasper, G., & Dahl, M. (1991). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 215–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kasper, G., & Roever, C. (2005). Pragmatics in second language learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language learning and teaching (pp. 317–334). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2014). Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 171–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kasper, G., & Youn, S. J. (2017). Transforming instruction to activity: Roleplay in language assessment. Applied Linguistics Review. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim, J. (2014). How Korean EFL learners understand sarcasm in L2 English. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  34. Li, S. (2014). The effects of different levels of linguistic proficiency on the development of L2 Chinese request production during study abroad. System, 45, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu, J. (2006). Measuring interlanguage pragmatic knowledge of EFL learners. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  36. Louw, K. J., Derwing, T. M., & Abbott, M. L. (2010). Teaching pragmatics to L2 learners for the workplace: The job interview. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 739–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nguyen, T. T. M., Do, T. T. H., & Nguyen, A. T. (2015). Teaching email requests in the academic context: A focus on the role of corrective feedback. Language Awareness, 24, 169–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Okada, Y. (2010). Role-plays in oral proficiency interviews: Interactive footing and interactional competencies. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1647–1668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roever, C. (2005). Testing ESL pragmatics. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roever, C. (2011). Testing of second language pragmatics: Past and future. Language Testing, 28, 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roever, C., Fraser, C., & Elder, C. (2014). Testing ESL sociopragmatics: Development and validation of a web-based test battery. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rose, K. R. (2005). On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System, 33, 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rose, K. R., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (2001). Pragmatics and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Ross, S., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (2013). Assessing second language pragmatics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Schauer, G. (2009). Interlanguage pragmatic development: The study abroad context. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  46. Searle, J. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sydorenko, T. (2015). The use of computer-delivered structured tasks in pragmatic instruction: An exploratory study. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12, 333–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sykes, J. (2013). Multiuser virtual environments: Learner apologies in Spanish. In N. Taguchi & J. Sykes (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 71–100). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taguchi, N. (2005). Comprehension of implied meaning in English as a second language. Modern Language Journal, 89, 543–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48, 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y. (Eds.). (2018). Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  53. Taguchi, N., & Sykes, J. (Eds.). (2013). Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  54. Walters, F. S. (2007). A conversation-analytic hermeneutic rating protocol to assess L2 oral pragmatic competence. Language Testing, 24, 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yamashita, S. O. (1996). Six measures of JSL pragmatics (Technical Report #14). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
  56. Youn, S. J. (2014). Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 pragmatic production: Investigating relationships among pragmatics, grammar, and proficiency. System, 42, 270–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Youn, S. J. (2015). Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, 32, 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Youn, S. J., & Brown, J. D. (2013). Item difficulty and heritage language learner status in pragmatic tests for Korean as a foreign language. In S. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp. 98–123). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA

Personalised recommendations