Advertisement

Digital Discourses Research and Methods

  • Christoph A. Hafner

Abstract

Digital discourses, that is, texts and interactions in digitally mediated contexts, provide an additional site for applied linguistics research, presenting opportunities and challenges. This chapter begins by providing an overview of the unique affordances and constraints of digital tools and how such tools affect, among other things, the kinds of meanings we can make and the kinds of relationships we can have. The chapter examines important kinds of digital texts and interactions, having regard to (1) how the study of such digital discourses relates to key questions in applied linguistics and (2) how particular digital discourses can be studied, considering issues related to the collection and analysis of data. Common research methodologies used in this area are illustrated by reference to examples drawn from key studies.

Keywords

Discourse analysis Digital media Digital literacies Digital ethnography Computer-mediated communication 

References

  1. Androutsopoulos, J., & Tereick, J. (2016). YouTube: Language and discourse practices in participatory culture. In A. Georgakopoulou & T. Spilioti (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 355–370). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Angouri, J., & Sanderson, T. (2016). ‘You’ll find lots of help here’: Unpacking the function of an online Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) forum. Language & Communication, 46(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  4. Bassett, E. H., & O’Riordan, K. (2002). Ethics of Internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benson, P. (2015). Commenting to learn: Evidence of language and intercultural learning in comments on YouTube videos. Language Learning & Technology, 19(3), 88–105.Google Scholar
  6. Giles, D., Stommel, W., Paulus, T., Lester, J., & Reed, D. (2015). Microanalysis of online data: The methodological development of “digital CA”. Discourse, Context & Media, 7, 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hafner, C. A. (2013). Digital composition in a second or foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 830–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hafner, C. A., Li, D. C. S., & Miller, L. (2015). Language choice among peers in project-based learning: A Hong Kong case study of English language learners’ plurilingual practices in out-of-class computer-mediated communication. Canadian Modern Language Review, 71(4), 441–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herring, S. C. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behaviour. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338–376). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet, 4(1), 1–37.Google Scholar
  12. Hudson, J. M., & Bruckman, A. (2004). “Go away”: Participant objections to being studied and the ethics of chatroom research. The Information Society, 20(2), 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, R. H. (2002). The problem of context in computer mediated communication. In P. LeVine & R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis (pp. 20–33). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, R. H. (2015). Discourse, cybernetics, and the entextualization of the self. In R. H. Jones, A. Chik, & C. A. Hafner (Eds.), Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digital age (pp. 28–47). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones, R. H., & Hafner, C. A. (2012). Understanding digital literacies: A practical introduction. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lockwood, J., & Forey, G. (2016). Discursive control and power in virtual meetings. Discourse & Communication, 10(4), 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. m. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Smith, B. A., & Podlasov, A. (2013). Multimodal digital semiotics: The interaction of language with other resources. Text & Talk, 33(4–5), 665–690.Google Scholar
  22. Page, R. (2016). Moving between the big and small: Identity and interaction in digital contexts. In A. Georgakopoulou & T. Spilioti (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 403–407). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Paolillo, J. C. (2016). Network analysis. In A. Georgakopoulou & T. Spilioti (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 36–54). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Recktenwald, D. (2017). Toward a transcription and analysis of live streaming on Twitch. Journal of Pragmatics, 115, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Stenström, A. B. (2014). An introduction to spoken interaction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38–67.Google Scholar
  28. Townley, A., & Jones, A. (2016). The role of emails and covering letters in negotiating a legal contract: A case study from Turkey. English for Specific Purposes, 44(1), 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  30. Varis, P. (2016). Digital ethnography. In A. Georgakopoulou & T. Spilioti (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 55–68). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Warschauer, M., Zheng, B., & Park, Y. (2013). New ways of connecting reading and writing. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 825–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishCity University of Hong KongKowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations