Advertisement

Abstract

This chapter weighs the advantages and disadvantages of data collection through online questionnaires, as opposed to the traditional pen-and-paper method. Online questionnaires, which are frequently used in psychology, allow researchers to reach out to a larger, more diverse and more motivated pool of potential participants (i.e. not just their own students), which strengthens the ecological validity of the resulting database. Critics have raised issues of self-selection biases and lack of context. The chapter considers these issues and offers practical advice on how to develop questionnaires, how to run them and how to interpret the findings.

Keywords

Questionnaires Sampling Sample size Attractiveness Validity Language learning Online questionnaires 

References

  1. Barkhuizen, G. (2014). Number of participants. Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bass, A. R., & Firestone, I. J. (1980). Implications of representativeness for generalizability of field and laboratory research findings. American Psychologist, 35(2), 141–150.Google Scholar
  3. Costa, B., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2012). Psychotherapy across languages: Beliefs, attitudes and practices of monolingual and multilingual therapists with their multilingual patients. Language and Psychoanalysis, 1, 18–40; revised version reprinted in (2014) Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 14(3), 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  5. Dewaele, J.-M. (2013). Emotions in multiple languages (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Dewaele, J.-M. (2015). British ‘Bollocks’ versus American ‘Jerk’: Do native British English speakers swear more—or differently—compared to American English speakers? Applied Linguistic Review, 6(3), 309–339.Google Scholar
  7. Dewaele, J.-M. (2016). Thirty shades of offensiveness: L1 and LX English users’ understanding, perception and self-reported use of negative emotion-laden words. Journal of Pragmatics, 94, 112–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dewaele, J.-M., & Costa, B. (2013). Multilingual clients’ experience of psychotherapy. Language and Psychoanalysis, 2(2), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 237–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. (2016). Foreign language enjoyment and foreign language classroom anxiety. The right and left feet of FL learning? In P. MacIntyre, T. Gregersen, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 215–236). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dewaele, J.-M., MacIntyre, P., Boudreau, C., & Dewaele, L. (2016). Do girls have all the fun? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 2(1), 41–63.Google Scholar
  12. Dewaele, J.-M., & Pavlenko, A. (2001-2003). Web questionnaire on bilingualism and emotion. Unpublished manuscript, University of London.Google Scholar
  13. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, N. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Jaffe, E. (2005). How random is that. American Psychological Society, 9, 17–30. Retrieved from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/how-random-is-that#.WI68i3qvjvo
  16. Kemper, E. A., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Mixed methods sampling strategies in social research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 273–296). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  17. Ness Evans, A., & Rooney, B. J. (2013). Methods in psychological research (3rd ed.). New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is ‘big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Simpson, L., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2019). Self-misgendering among multilingual transgender speakers. International Journal of the Sociology of Language.Google Scholar
  20. Wilson, R., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2010). The use of web questionnaires in second language acquisition and bilingualism research. Second Language Research, 26(1), 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Linguistics and CommunicationBirkbeck, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations