Advertisement

Sentencing on Criminal Record

  • Margaret Fitzgerald O’Reilly
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines the impact of criminal convictions upon the sentencing process and focuses upon explaining when past convictions are taken into consideration by a sentencing judge, the justifications for this, the relevance of past records, and the effect that its use has upon the offender. There is a particular emphasis upon documenting the increased use of mandatory minimum sentencing provisions in Ireland that focus upon repeat offenders. In recent years, there has been a notable increase in legislative attention to the use of criminal records in sentencing and the implications of this are explored in this chapter.

Bibliography

  1. Ashworth, A. (1983). Sentencing and Penal Policy. London: Weidenfield & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  2. Ashworth, A. (2017). Deserved Criminal Sentences. London: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Beccaria, C. (1963). On Crimes and Punishments (H. Paolucci, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Company.Google Scholar
  4. Bottoms, A. E., & Brownsword, R. (1982). The Dangerousness Debate After the Floud Report. British Journal of Criminology, 22, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doob, A., & Webster, C. (2003). Sentence Severity and Crime: Accepting the Null Hypothesis. Crime and Justice, 30, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Edney, R., & Bagaric, M. (2007). Australian Sentencing; Principles and Practice. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ehlers, S., Schiraldi, V., & Ziedenberg, J. (2004). Still Striking Out: Ten Years of California’s Three Strikes Law. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Farrell, R. A., & Swigert, V. L. (1978). Prior Offence Record as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. Law & Society Review, 12(3), 437–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitzgerald, C. (2008). Californication of Irish Sentencing Law. Irish Criminal Law Journal, 18(2), 42.Google Scholar
  10. Floud, J., & Young, W. (1981). Dangerousness and Criminal Justice. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  11. Hart, H. L. A., & Gardner, J. (2008). Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. HMSO, White Paper. (1990). Crime, Justice and Protecting the Public: The Governments Proposals for Legislation. Cm965. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  13. Hough, M., Jacobson, J., & Millie, A. (2003). The Decision to Imprison: Sentencing and the Prison Population. London: Prison Reform Trust.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobs, J. B. (2015). The Eternal Criminal Record. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, T., & Newburn, T. (2006). Three Strikes and You’re Out: Exploring Symbol and Substance in American and British Crime Control Politics. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kilcommins, S., O’Donnell, I., O’Sullivan, E., & Vaughan, B. (2004). Crime, Punishment and the Search for Order in Ireland. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
  17. McGuire, J. (Ed.). (2002). Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment: Effective Programmes and Policies to Reduce Re-offending. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Monahan, J. (2004). The Future of Violence Risk Management. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The Future of Imprisonment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Murphy, G. (2007). An Analysis of Sentencing Provisions in the Criminal Justice Act 2006. Judicial Studies Institute Journal, 1, 60–100.Google Scholar
  20. Ni Raifeartaigh, U. (1993). The Law Reform Commission Consultation Paper on Sentencing. Irish Law Times, 11, 101.Google Scholar
  21. O’Malley, T. (2011). Sentencing: Towards a Coherent System. Dublin: Round Hall.Google Scholar
  22. O’Malley, T. (2006). Sentencing Law and Practice (2nd ed.). Dublin: Round Hall.Google Scholar
  23. O’Malley, T. (2016). Sentencing Law and Practice (3rd ed.). Dublin: Round Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Roberts, J. V. (1997). The Role of Criminal Record in the Sentencing Process. Crime and Justice, 22, 303–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roberts, J. V., & Yalincak, O. K. (2014). Revisiting Prior Record Enhancement Provisions in State Sentencing Guidelines. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 26(3), 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Russell, S. (2010). Rethinking Recidivist Enhancements: The Role of Prior Drug Convictions in Federal Sentencing. U.C. Davis Law Review, 43, 1135–1182.Google Scholar
  27. Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. (2002). The Effect of Imprisonment on Recidivism Rates of Felony Offenders: A Focus on Drug Offenders. Criminology, 40, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. The Law Reform Commission. (LRC CP 6-1993). Consultation Paper on Sentencing. Dublin: Law Reform Commission.Google Scholar
  29. Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Tonry, M. (2004). Punishment and Politics: Evidence and Emulation in the Making of English Crime Control Policy. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  31. Tonry, M. (2014). The Questionable Relevance of Previous Convictions to Punishments for Later Crimes. In J. V. Roberts & J. V. Von Hirsch (Eds.), Previous Convictions at Sentencing. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  32. Travis, J. (2002). Invisible Punishment: An Instrument of Social Exclusion. In M. Mauer & M. Chesney-Lind (Eds.), Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Consequences of Mass Imprisonment. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  33. Von Hirsch, A. (1976). Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  34. Von Hirsch, A. (1981). Desert and Previous Convictions in Sentencing. Minnesota Law Review, 65, 591.Google Scholar
  35. Von Hirsch, A. (2002). Record-Enhanced Sentencing in England and Wales. In S. Rex & M. Tonry (Eds.), Reform and Punishment: The Future of Sentencing. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Von Hirsch, A. (2005). Proportionate Punishments. In A. Von Hirsch & A. Ashworth (Eds.), Principled Sentencing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Von Hirsch, A. (2009). Incapacitation. In A. Ashworth, A. Von Hirsch, & J. Roberts (Eds.), Principled Sentencing: Readings on Theory and Policy (3rd ed.). Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Von Hirsch, A. (2014). Proportionality and the progressive Loss of Mitigation: Some Further Reflections. In J. V. Roberts & J. V. Von Hirsch (Eds.), Previous Convictions at Sentencing. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  39. Von Hirsch, A., Bottoms, A. E., Burney, E., & Wikstrom, P. O. (1999b). Criminal Deterrence and Sentencing Severity. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Von Hirsch, A., & Roberts, J. V. (2004). Legislating Sentencing Principles: The Provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 Relating to Sentencing Purposes and the Role of Previous Convictions. Criminal Law Review, 639Google Scholar
  41. Young, D. (1986). Introduction, On Crimes and Punishments. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  42. Zimring, F. E., Hawkins, G., & Kamin, S. (2001). Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You’re Out in California. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margaret Fitzgerald O’Reilly
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LimerickLimerickIreland

Personalised recommendations