Advertisement

Austria: Engaged Neutrality

  • Heinz Gärtner
Chapter
Part of the New Security Challenges book series (NSECH)

Abstract

As a non-NATO state, Austria participates in peace operations and cooperates with NATO while retaining its existing defence policy. Naturally, the fundamental basis of a neutral security policy is avoidance of alliance obligations, including when armed forces are deployed abroad. However, modern neutrality does not exclude cooperation with alliance members or alliances, as long as they can agree on the key issues. Austria shares the basic threat analyses and goals with NATO within the framework of the Alliance’s partnerships, which are not necessarily limited to the institution of Partnership for Peace (PfP). In this partnership context, peace operations are compatible with neutrality. Austria’s ‘engaged neutrality’ means active participation in international security policy in general, and in international peace operations in particular.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I want to thank Caroline Skerlan, Alice Czimmermann, Paul Trauttmansdorff, Katharina Hämmerle and Dominik Rastinger for translations and research.

References

  1. Adenauer, K. (1966). Erinnerungen 1953–1955. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
  2. Adenauer, K. (1967). Erinnerungen 1955–1959. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
  3. Austrian Constitution. (2013). Austria’s Constitution of 1920, Reinstated in 1945, with Amendments Through 2013. Available: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Austria_2013.pdf?lang=en (8 August 2016.
  4. Austrian Federal Assembly. (1955, October 26). Federal Constitutional Law on the Neutrality of Austria. Available: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Erv/ERV_1955_211/ERV_1955_211.pdf (8 August 2016).
  5. Bayer, R. (1995). The Development of ULV from 1961 to 1985: Prerequisite for the Constitutional Holding and the Defense Doctrine. ÖMZ (Special Issue).Google Scholar
  6. Bundeskanzleramt (BKA). (1985). National Defense Plan. Vienna: Bundeskanzleramt (BKA).Google Scholar
  7. Bundeskanzleramt Osterreich. (2013). Austrian Security Strategy Security in a New Decade: Shaping Security. Vienna: Bundeskanzleramt Osterreich. Available: https://www.bka.gv.at/DocView.axd?CobId=52251 (7 August 2016).
  8. Council of the European Union. (2015, July). The European Union in a Changing Global Environment: A More Connected, Contested and Complex World. Brussels: Council of the European Union. Available: https://eeas.europa.eu/docs/strategic_review/eu-strategic-review_strategic_review_en.pdf (7 August 2016).
  9. Docsek, C. (2001). Das Konzept umfassende Sicherheit und die Debatte österreichische Sicherheits- und Verteidigungsdoktrin, doctoral thesis, Vienna: Faculty of Human and Social Sciences of Vienna University.Google Scholar
  10. Gärtner, H. (2015, October 14). The Future of the EU Is About Global Crisis Management, The Europe We Want!. Europe’s World.Google Scholar
  11. Kmentt, A. (2014a, June). Der pragmatische Realismus des Wahnsinns - Sicherheit durch nukleare Abschreckung war und ist eine Schimäre. Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
  12. Kmentt, A. (2014b, June 24). Avoiding the Worst: Re-framing the Debate on Nuclear Disarmament. European Leadership Network.Google Scholar
  13. Sauer, T. (2015, August 6). 70 Years After Hiroshima, the Humanitarian Initiative Challenges Nuclear Weapons. European Leadership Network.Google Scholar
  14. Wiener Zeitung. (1985, March 2). Defense Doctrine. Wiener Zeitung (Special Edition).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heinz Gärtner
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Vienna, International Institute for Peace (IIP)ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations