Introduction: The Time We Have–The Time We Make

  • Roxana Moroşanu
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Anthropology of Sustainability book series (PSAS)


Here, Moroşanu introduces her research and situates the theoretical take of the book in relation to the anthropology of energy and social sciences of sustainability literatures. She identifies two interrelated calls—fora reconceptualization of human agency and for new approaches to time—and shows the ways in which the monograph will respond to both. She then looks at the context of the research, focusing on: the interdisciplinary academic framework as well as research funding related to climate change policy in the UK, a set of cultural ideas about the concept of family, and the temporal frameworks and approaches to time that family participants employed in their everyday lives.


  1. Anscombe, Gertrude Elizabeth. 2000 [1957]. Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. BBC. 2015. “Government Considers Fracking Plans in National Parks.”
  3. Birth, Kevin K. 2012. Objects of Time: How Things Shape Temporality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Boyer, Dominic. 2014. “Energopower: An Introduction.” Anthropological Quarterly 87 (2): 309–333.Google Scholar
  7. Carrington, Damian. 2015. “Fracking Will Be Allowed under National Parks, UK Decides.” The Guardian, February 12.
  8. Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. D’Alisa, Giacomo, Federico Demaria, and Giorgos Kallis. 2015. Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. EREC. 2010. Rethinking 2050: A 100% Renewable Energy Vision for the EU. Brussels: EREC.Google Scholar
  11. Eriksen, Thomas. 2001. Tyranny of the Moment: Fast and Slow Time in the Information Age. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  12. EST. 2011. The Elephant in the Living-Room: How Our Appliances and Gadgets Are Trampling the Green Dream.
  13. Faubion, James D. 2011. An Anthropology of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foucault, Michel. 1990. The History of Sexuality, vol. 2. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, Michel. 2000. Ethics: Subjectiviy and Truth (Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  16. Gershon, Ilana. 2011. “Neoliberal Agency.” Current Anthropology 52 (4): 537–555.Google Scholar
  17. Glennie, Paul and Nigel Thrift. 2009. Shaping the Day: A History of Timekeeping in England and Wales 1300–1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Greenhouse, Carol J. 1996. A Moment’s Notice: Time Politics Across Cultures. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Guyer, Jane I. 2007. “Prophecy and the Near Future: Thoughts on Macroeconomic, Evangelical, and Punctuated Time.” American Ethnologist 34 (3): 409–421.Google Scholar
  20. Haraway, Donna. 1991. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Centurt.” In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women, edited by Donna Haraway, 149–181. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  21. Hargreaves, Tom. 2012. “Questioning the Virtues of Pro-Environmental Behaviour Research: Towards a Phronetic Approach.” Geoforum 43 (2). Elsevier Ltd: 315–324.Google Scholar
  22. Harvey, David. 1990. The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Hobson, Kersty. 2011. “Environmental Politics, Green Governmentality and the Possibility of a ‘Creative Grammar’ for Domestic Sustainable Consumption.” In Material Geographies of Household Sustainability, edited by Ruth Lane and Andrew Gorman-Murray, 193–210. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Hobson, Kersty. 2013. “On the Making of the Environmental Citizen.” Environmental Politics 22 (1): 56–72.Google Scholar
  25. Hornborg, Alf. 2013. “The Fossil Interlude: Euro-American Power and the Return of the Physiocrats.” In Cultures of Energy: Power, Practices, Technologies, edited by Sarah Strauss, Stephanie Rupp, and Thomas Love, 41–59. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  26. James, Alison. 1998. “Imagining Children ‘At Home’, ‘In the Family’ and ‘At School’: Movement Between the Spatial and Temporal Markers of Childhood Identity in Britain.” In Migrants of Identity: Perceptions of “Home” in a World of Movement, edited by Nigel Rapport and Andrew Dawson. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  27. Klein, Naomi. 2014. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  28. Knox, Hannah. 2015. “Thinking like a Climate.” Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 16 (1): 91–109.Google Scholar
  29. Laidlaw, James. 2014. The Subject of Virtue: An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Latour, Bruno. 2014. “Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene.” New Literary History 45 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
  32. Massumi, Brian. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Milton, Kay. 1996. Environmentalism and Cultural Theory: Exploring the Role of Anthropology in Environmental Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Mitchell, Timothy. 2011. Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  35. Moore, Henrietta L. 2011. Still Life: Hopes, Desires and Satisfactions. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  36. Morgan, David H.J. 1996. Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  37. Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. PWC. 2010. 100% Renewable Electricity: A Roadmap to 2050 for Europe and North Africa. London: PWC.Google Scholar
  39. Serres, Michel. 1982. Hermes: Literature, Science, Philosophy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Shove, Elizabeth. 2003. Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality. London: Berg.Google Scholar
  41. Shove, Elizabeth. 2010a. “Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change.” Environment and Planning A 42 (6): 1273–1285.Google Scholar
  42. Shove, Elizabeth. 2010b. “Social Theory and Climate Change: Questions Often, Sometimes and Not yet Asked.” Theory, Culture & Society 27 (2–3). TCS Centre: 277–288.Google Scholar
  43. Slocum, Rachel. 2004. “Consumer Citizens and the Cities for Climate Protection Campaign.” Environment and Planning A 36 (5): 763–782.Google Scholar
  44. Stirling, Andy. 2014. “Transforming Power: Social Science and the Politics of Energy Choices.” Energy Research and Social Science 1. Elsevier Ltd.: 83–95.Google Scholar
  45. Strathern, Marilyn. 1992. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Strauss, Sarah, Stephanie Rupp, and Thomas Love. 2013. “Introduction. Powerlines: Cultures of Energy in the Twenty-First Century.” In Cultures of Energy: Power, Practices, Technologies, edited by Sarah Strauss, Stephanie Rupp, and Thomas Love. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  47. Thrift, Nigel. 2008. Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Urry, John. 2000. Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Virilio, Paul. 2012. The Great Accelerator. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  50. Wajcman, Judy. 2015. Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Warde, Alan. 2005. “Consumption and Theories of Practice.” Journal of Consumer Culture 5 (2): 131–153.Google Scholar
  52. Wilhite, Harold. 2005. “Why Energy Needs Anthropology.” Anthropology Today 21 (3): 1–2.Google Scholar
  53. WWF. 2011. The Energy Report: 100% Renewable Energy by 2050. Gland: WWF.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (, which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roxana Moroşanu
    • 1
  1. 1.Loughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations