Conclusion: Contestations Within, Rather Than About, Nationalism

  • John Erik Fossum
  • Riva Kastoryano
  • Birte Siim
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology book series (PSEPS)

Abstract

The main contestations that we are witnessing today have been subsumed under the nationalist logic rather than confronting it outright. But even if the terms of debate are set within the ambit of nationalism, transnationalism, cosmopolitanism, and nationalist resurgence (mainly through right-wing populism) reside in different renditions of nationalism. The terms of contestation are however not confined to the form of nationalism, they also encompass the relationship between nationalism and the state. Transnational nationalism emerges as a de-territorialised form of nationalism, a distinct configuration of identity, community, territory, and an underpinning or underlying political structure; the EU and Canada’s embedded cosmopolitan features are reflected in a highly inclusive form of nationalism; and right-wing populist or “new” nationalism is an exclusivist, ethnic form of nationalism.

References

  1. Bangstad, S., & Bunzl, M. (2010). Anthropologists Are Talking About Islamophobia and Anti-Semitism in the New Europe. Ethnos, 75(2), 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Wimmer, A., & Schiller, N. G. (2002). Methodological Nationalism and Beyond: Nation-State Building, Migration and the Social Sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Erik Fossum
    • 1
  • Riva Kastoryano
    • 2
  • Birte Siim
    • 3
  1. 1.University of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Sciences PoParisFrance
  3. 3.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations