Advertisement

Untimely Mountains | Entangled Matter

  • Kim W. Wilson
Chapter

Abstract

In the context of the material ‘turn’ and the new material feminisms of philosophers such as Elizabeth Grosz and Karen Barad, this chapter examines the different artistic approaches of the author and the artist John Latham to the oil-shale waste bings of West Lothian, Scotland.

In the 1970s the latter adopted a distanced perspective prioritising form over the material properties and forces of the waste itself. As a visual artist my approach to Niddry bing examines the state of flux of the site as a whole, but also of the oil-shale waste in particular: its oxidisation, its potential for crushing, flaking, compressing and mixing. In examining these two distinct artistic approaches the chapter describes a broader philosophical shift in the humanities and social sciences from the epistemological to the ontological.

Keywords

Material turn Niddry bing Sculpture 

Bibliography

  1. Allix, P., Burnham, A., Fowler, T., Herron, M., Kleinberg, R., & Symington, B. (2011). Coaxing oil from shale. Oil Field Review, 22(4), 4–15.Google Scholar
  2. Almond Valley Heritage Trust. (n.d.). Scottish a brief history of Scotland’s shale oil industry. www.scottishshale.co.uk. Accessed 15 Jan 2013.
  3. Almond Valley Heritage Trust. (2010). A brief history of Scotland’s shale oil industry. http://www.scottishshale.co.uk/KnowledgePages/Histories/ScottishShaleOilIndustry.html. Accessed 3 Sept 2015.
  4. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bolt, B. (2006). Materializing pedagogies. Working papers in art and design 4, University of Hertfordshire. http://herts.ac.uk/_data/assets/pdf_file/0015/12381/WPIAAD_vol4_bolt.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2015.
  7. Bolt, B. (2013). Introduction: Toward a ‘new materialism’ through the arts. In B. Bolt & E. Barrett (Eds.), Carnal knowledge: Towards a new materialism through the arts (pp. 1–14). London: IB Tauris & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency and politics (pp. 1–46). Durham/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. COST. (2013). New materialism: Networking European scholarship on ‘how matter comes to matter’. In Memorandum of understanding for the implementation of a European concerted research action designated as COST action IS1307. Brussels: European Cooperation in Science and Technology Research (COST).Google Scholar
  10. Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). New materialism: Interviews & cartographies. Michigan: Open Humanities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellis, R. (2009). Oil shale. Oil Shale Information Centre, September 1. www.oilshale.co.uk. Accessed 4 Apr 2013.
  12. European Academies Science Advisory Council. (2007). A study on the EU oil shale industry—Viewed in the light of the Estonian experience. Study, EASAC.Google Scholar
  13. Gil Harris, J. (2009). Untimely matter in time of Shakespeare. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grosz, E. (2010). The untimeliness of feminist theory. NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 18(1), 48–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grosz, E. (2011). Becoming undone: Darwinian reflections on life, politics and art. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hale, J. (2006). Gottfried Semper’s primitive hut: Duration, construction and self-creation. In J. Odgers, F. Samuel, & A. Sharr (Eds.), Primitive: Original matters in architecture (pp. 52–62). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, O., & Fowler, C. (2015). Enduring relations: Exploring a paradox of a new materialism. Journal of Material Culture, 20(2), 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harvie, B. (2005). West Lothian local biodiversity plan: Oil shale bings. West Lothian: West Lothian Council.Google Scholar
  19. Hinton, P., & van der Tuin, I. (2014). Preface. Women: A Cultural Review, 25(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  20. Ingold, T. (2010). The textility of making. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iovino, S., & Oppermann, S. (2014). Introduction: Stories come to matter. In S. Iovino & S. Oppermann (Eds.), Material ecocriticism (pp. 1–17). Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Knox, H. (2010a). Obtaining oil from oil shale. www.scottishshale.co.uk. Accessed 15 Jan 2013.
  23. Knox, H. (2010b). The mining of shale. www.scottishshale.co.uk. Accessed 15 Jan 2013.
  24. Lange-Berndt, P. (2015). Introduction: Complicity with materials. In P. Lange Berndt (Ed.), Materiality (documents of contemporary art) (pp. 12–23). London: Whitechapel Gallery.Google Scholar
  25. Latham, J. (1976). Feasibility study. Tate archive TGA 20042.Google Scholar
  26. Ligatus Research Centre. (2015). John Latham archive. http://www.ligatus.org.uk/aae/node/2527. Accessed 2 Mar 2013.
  27. McNeil, M. (2010). Post-millennial feminist theory: Encounters with humanism, materialism, critique, biology and Darwin. Journal for Cultural Research, 14(4), 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller. (1942). Stewartfield Gala Day, Broxburn. Film. Directed by Mr. Miller. Regal Cinema.Google Scholar
  29. Monaghan, A. A. (2014). The carboniferous shales of the midland valley of Scotland: Geology and resource estimation. Governmental, London: British Geological Survey for Department of Energy and Climate Change.Google Scholar
  30. Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. London: Taylor and Francis/Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Randall, S. (1984). Oral history. Scottish Shale, December 5. http://www.scottishshale.co.uk/DigitalAssets/pdf/Reference/OralHistoryTranscripts/JM,%20Mr-%20(4).pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2013.
  32. Richardson, C. (2011). Scottish art since 1960, historical reflections and contemporary overviews. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  33. Richardson, C. (2012). Tate papers no. 17 waste to monument: John Latham’s Niddrie woman. Tate. http://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate-papers/17/waste-to-monument-john-lathams-niddrie-woman. Accessed 5 Mar 2013.
  34. Scottish Oils Limited. (1948). A brief description of the operations of the Scottish shale oil industry. Glasgow: Scottish Oils Ltd.Google Scholar
  35. Stiles, K. K. (n.d.). John Latham 1921–2006 artist biography. http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/john-latham-1470. Accessed 12 May 2013.
  36. Tate. (n.d.). Glossary: Artist placement group. http://www.tate.org.uk/learn/online-resources/glossary/a/artist-placement-group. Accessed 12 May 2013.
  37. Torrence, K. (2011). Investigation of self-sustaining combustion of a coal waste heap in Scotland. GSA Annual Meeting in Minneapolis, Minneapolis, October 9.Google Scholar
  38. van der Tuin, I. (2011). Review essay: ‘New feminist materialisms’. Women’s Studies International Forum, 34, 271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walker, R. L. (2014). The living present as a materialist feminist temporality. Women: A Cultural Review, 25(1), 40–61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim W. Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.Edinburgh College of Art, University of EdinburghEdinburghScotland

Personalised recommendations