Advertisement

Homeless Survival and Resistance in the Neoliberal City

  • Chantal Butchinsky
Chapter

Abstract

Chantal Butchinsky aims to explore the ways that neoliberal urban policies have affected the lives of homeless people and discusses how street homeless people deploy survival and resistance strategies in neoliberal cities. Research using an anthropological methodology focuses particularly on the case study of a chronically homeless man, Double Diamond. ‘Roll out’ neoliberal policies since the 1980s have created a ‘new regime’, whereby city organisations consider homeless people who do not accept their services as anti-social individuals who require the control and discipline of experts. Yet ‘resistance’ can be re-conceptualised as a diffuse, at times subversive, idea of a homeless lifestyle and culture, while concepts of ‘unhome’ and ‘economies of makeshift’ facilitate a discussion of how homelessness may be considered an effective strategy of survival.

References

  1. Bird, John. 2001. Special Supplement. The Independent, December 8, p. 7.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2002. Don’t Give Money to Beggars. The Sunday Times, December 22, p. 1.Google Scholar
  3. Desjarlais, Robert. 1997. Shelter Blues. Philadelphia, PA: Penn Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fumerton, Patricia. 2006. Unsettled: The Culture of Mobility and the Working Poor in Early Modern England. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gray, Frank. 1931. The Tramp: His Meaning and Being. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Hopper, K., E. Susser, and S. Conover. 1985. Economies of Makeshift: Deindustrialization and Homelessness in New York City. Urban Anthropology 14 (1–3): 183–236.Google Scholar
  7. Hufton, Olwen H. 1974. The Poor of Eighteenth-Century France 1750–1789. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ingold, Tim. 2005. Epilogue: Towards a Politics of Dwelling. Conservation and Society 3 (2): 501–508.Google Scholar
  9. Jiménez, Alberto Corsin. 2003. On Space as a Capacity. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9 (1): 37–153.Google Scholar
  10. Kendall, Jeremy. 2000. The Mainstreaming of the Third Sector into Public Policy in England in the Late 1990s: Whys and Wherefores. Policy and Politics 28 (4): 541–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lenhard, Johannes. 2014. Austere Kindness or Mindless Austerity: The Effects Of Gift-Giving to Beggars in East London. Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología 18: 85–105 (Bogotá). https://www.academia.edu/6720958/Austere_kindness_or_mindless_austerity_the_effects_of_gift-giving_to_beggars_in_east_London. Accessed 11 Apr 2014.
  12. Madden, Mary. 2003. Braving Homelessness on the Ethnographic Street with Irene Glasser and Rae Bridgman. Critique of Anthropology 23 (3): 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mayer, Margit. 2009. The ‘Right to the City’ in the Context of Shifting Mottos of Urban Social Movements. City 13 (2–3): 362–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mitchell, Don. 1992. Iconography and Locational Conflict from the Underside – Free Speech, People’s Park and the Politics of Homelessness in Berkeley, California. Political Geography 11 (2): 152–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Newburn, Tim, and Paul Rock. 2005. Living in Fear: Violence and Victimisation in the Lives of Single Homeless People. London: Crisis.Google Scholar
  16. Oxford City Council. 2001. Street Scene Task Force: Progress Report.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2013. Ending Rough Sleeping in Oxford Action Plan. https://www.oxford.gov.uk/downloads/download/593/ending_rough_sleeping_in_oxford_action_plan
  18. Ravenhill, Megan. 2008. The Culture of Homelessness. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Thanem, Torkild. 2012. All Talk and No Movement? Homeless Coping and Resistance to Urban Planning. Organization 19 (4): 441–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tonkens, Evelien, and Lia van Doorn. 2001. Turning Rough Sleepers into Responsible Citizens: Third Way Policies on Homelessness in England and the Netherlands. Renewal 9 (2-3): 142–151.Google Scholar
  21. Veness, April P. 1993. Neither Homed Nor Homeless: Contested Definitions and Personal Worlds of the Poor. Political Geography 12 (4): 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Whiteford, Martin. 2008. Street Homelessness and the Architecture of Citizenship. People, Place & Policy Online 2 (2): 88–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. 2010. Hot Tea, Dry Toast and the Responsibilisation of Homeless People. Social Policy & Society 9 (2): 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wright, Talmadge. 1997. Out of Place: Homeless Mobilizations, Subcities, and Contested Landscapes. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  25. Wright, Talmadge, and Anita Vermund. 1996. Suburban Homelessness and Social Space: Strategies of Authority and Local Resistance in Orange County, California. In There’s No Place Like Home, ed. Anna Lou Dehavenon, 1–17. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chantal Butchinsky
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Birkbeck CollegeLondonUK
  2. 2.Oxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations