Advertisement

De-colonising ‘What Works’

  • Elena MarchettiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Race, Ethnicity, Indigeneity and Criminal Justice book series (PSREICJ)

Abstract

This chapter brings together the ideas and findings presented in the previous chapters to consider how current and future justice responses should be tailored to best serve the needs of victims and offenders of Indigenous partner violence. In particular, this chapter focuses on how the research findings are similar or different compared to those of others, and how they relate to feminist debates concerning the use of informal or innovative justice practices when sentencing partner violence offenders. Research or evaluation of even the most thoughtful Indigenous-focused crime and justice programs continues to find that such programs have little or no impact on offending outcomes such as recidivism rates, but we need to ask whether such findings are an accurate reflection of program ineffectiveness or the consequence of how the research was carried out. This chapter considers this question with reference to Indigenous-focused sentencing court practices for those who abuse their partners.

Keywords

De-colonising Evaluations Impact studies Pathways to desistance Methodologies Epistemology Axiology Ontology Judicial officers Judge Magistrate Prosecutor Elders Community Representatives Role of victims 

References

  1. Behrendt, L. (2002) ‘Lessons from the Mediation Obsession: Ensuring That Sentencing “Alternatives” Focus on Indigenous Self-Determination’, in Strang, H. & Braithwaite, J. (eds.) Restorative Justice and Family Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 178–190.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, P. (2016) Specialist Courts for Sentencing Aboriginal Offenders: Aboriginal Courts in Australia. Annandale: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beranger, B., Weatherburn, D. and Moffatt, S. (2010) ‘Reducing Indigenous Contact with the Court System’, NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research: Crime and Justice Statistics Bureau Brief, 54, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  4. Bhabha, H. K. (1994) The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Blagg, H., Williams, E., Cummings, E., Hovane, V., Torres, M. and Woodley, K. N. (2018) Innovative Models in Addressing Violence Against Indigenous Women: Final Report, Sydney: Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety Limited.Google Scholar
  6. Bottoms, A. (2014) ‘Desistance from Crime’, in Ashmore, Z. & Shuker, R. (eds.) Forensic Practice in the Community. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 251–273.Google Scholar
  7. Byles, D. and Karp, T. (2010) Sentencing in the Koori Court Division of the Magistrates’ Court: A Statistical Report. Melbourne: Sentencing Advisory Council.Google Scholar
  8. Cannon, A. (2007) ‘South Australia: Nunga Court II—Aboriginal Sentencing Conferences’, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Indigenous Courts Conference, Mildura, 5 September.Google Scholar
  9. Cultural & Indigenous Research Centre Australia (CIRCA). (2008) Evaluation of Circle Sentencing Program: Report. Sydney: NSW Attorney General’s Department.Google Scholar
  10. Davies, M. (2002) Asking the Law Question. 2nd ed. Sydney: Lawbook Co.Google Scholar
  11. Dick, D. (2004) ‘Circle Sentencing of Aboriginal Offenders: Victims Have a Say’, The Judicial Review, 7, pp. 57–72.Google Scholar
  12. Dick, D. and Wallace, G. (2007) ‘Sentencing of Aboriginal Offenders’, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Indigenous Courts Conference, Mildura, 4–7 September: Australian Institute of Judicial Administration.Google Scholar
  13. Fitzgerald, J. (2008) Does Circle Sentencing Reduce Aboriginal Offending? Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research 115. Available at: http://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Documents/CJB/cjb115.pdf (Accessed: 18 May 2015).
  14. Fletcher, R. (2009) Father-Inclusive Practice Guide. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Available at: https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/father_inclusive_practice.pdf (Accessed: 20 November 2018).
  15. Harris, M. (2006) “A Sentencing Conversation”: Evaluation of the Koori Courts Pilot Program October 2002–October 2004. Melbourne: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  16. Jambor, C. (2018) ‘Does Circle Sentencing Reduce Recidivism and Keep Indigenous Offenders Out of Jail? A Study Will Find Out’, ABC News, 4 September. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-04/circle-sentencing-to-be-reviewed-for-first-time-in-10-years/10198802 (Accessed: 20 November 2018).
  17. Kelly, L. (2002) ‘Using Restorative Justice Principles to Address Family Violence in Aboriginal Communities’, in Strang, H. & Braithwaite, J. (eds.) Restorative Justice and Family Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 206–222.Google Scholar
  18. Kelly, L. and Barac, A. (2011) The Rhetoric and the Reality: Youth Justice Conferencing for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Young Offenders in New South Wales. Submission to the Review by the NSW Department of Attorney General and Justice of the Young Offenders Act 1997 and the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987, Lismore.Google Scholar
  19. Mandel, D. and Rankin, H. (2018) Working with Men as Parents: Becoming Father-Inclusive to Improve Child Welfare Outcomes in Domestic Violence Cases. Columbus: Ohio Intimate Partner Violence Collaborative. Available at: https://safeandtogetherinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/OH_FYLAW_Working-with-Men-as-Parents-Brief_July-2018.pdf (Accessed: 20 November 2018).
  20. Marchetti, E. (2011) ‘Culture Versus Gender: How the Mainstream Criminal Court System Is Still Getting It Wrong’, Indigenous Law Bulletin, 7(26), pp. 27–30.Google Scholar
  21. Moss, A. (2000) ‘Diversionary Programs Within the Criminal Justice System and Their Effects on Victims’. Victims of Crime: Working Together to Improve Services: Conference Proceedings. Adelaide, South Australia: South Australian Institute of Justice Studies, 59–67.Google Scholar
  22. Parker, N. and Pathé, M. (2006) Report on the Review of the Murri Court. Brisbane: Queensland Department of Justice and Attorney-General.Google Scholar
  23. Potas, I., Smart, J., Brignell, G., Thomas, B. and Lawrie, R. (2003) Circle Sentencing in New South Wales: A Review and Evaluation. Sydney: Judicial Commission of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  24. Research and Analysis Branch Department of the Attorney General Western Australia. (2014) Evaluation of the Metropolitan Family Violence Court and Evaluation of the Barndimalgu Court: Evaluation Report. Perth: Government of Western Australia, Department of the Attorney General, Policy and Aboriginal Services Directorate.Google Scholar
  25. Rose, D. B. (1996) ‘Land Rights and Deep Colonising: The Erasure of Women’, Aboriginal Law Bulletin, 3(85), pp. 6–13.Google Scholar
  26. Rottman, D. (2000) ‘Does Effective Therapeutic Jurisprudence Require Specialized Courts (and Do Specialized Courts Imply Specialized Judges)?’, Court Review, 37(1), pp. 22–27.Google Scholar
  27. Roy, A. (2008) ‘Postcolonial Theory and Law: A Critical Introduction’, Adelaide Law Review, 29, pp. 315–357.Google Scholar
  28. Said, E. W. (1978) Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. London: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  29. Tauri, J. (1999) ‘Explaining Recent Innovations in New Zealand’s Criminal Justice System: Empowering Maori or Biculturalising the State?’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 32(2), pp. 153–167.Google Scholar
  30. Wilson, S. (2001) ‘What Is Indigenous Research Methodology?’, Canadian Journal of Native Education, 24(2), pp. 175–179.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Griffith Law SchoolGriffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations