Advertisement

Chapter 2.2: Ontological Engagement

  • Eugene MatusovEmail author
  • Ana Marjanovic-Shane
  • Mikhail Gradovski
Chapter

Abstract

What is ontological engagement of the students? We analyze practices described in the teaching cases looking for the meaning of ontological engagement. We found that kindling and nurturing students’ ontological engagement is an omnipresent pedagogical desire of all Bakhtinian educators we have interviewed as well as a schoolteacher of Russian, Mikhail Bakhtin himself (Bakhtin, Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42, 12–49, 2004). This pedagogical desire is to overcome alienated learning—learning which is prevalent in contemporary conventional schooling based on instrumental, technological assumptions. In this chapter we explore the diverse instances and meanings of students’ ontological engagement in the curriculum. We define students’ ontological engagement in education as when the students’ lives outside the classroom, as well as the students’ lives in the moment, become a crucial part of education itself. We explore different types of ontological engagement: extrinsic, intrinsic, eventful, and through self-selection. At the end of the chapter we discuss diverse issues of ontological engagement: pseudo-ontological engagement and exploitation of ontological engagement.

References

  1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1991). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1999). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bakhtin, M. M. (2004). Dialogic origin and dialogic pedagogy of grammar: Stylistics in teaching Russian language in secondary school. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42(6), 12–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. New York, NY: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill House.Google Scholar
  6. Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects—State, trends and issues in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyer, E. L. (1983). High school: A report on secondary education in America (1st ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience (1st ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  9. Davydov, V. V., & Kilpatrick, J. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1929). My pedagogic creed. Washington, DC: Progressive Education Association.Google Scholar
  11. Freedom Writers, & Gruwell, E. (1999). The Freedom Writers diary: How a teacher and 150 teens used writing to change themselves and the world around them (1st ed.). New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  12. Freire, P. (1986). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  13. Graeber, D. (2014). Debt: The first 5,000 years (Updated and expanded ed.). Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.Google Scholar
  14. Grumet, M. R. (1988). Bitter milk: Women and teaching. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hedeen, T. (2003). The reverse jigsaw: A process of cooperative learning and discussion. Teaching Sociology, 31(3), 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ito, M., Horst, H. A., Antin, J., & Finn, M. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kant, I. (2013). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. In R. Shafer-Landau (Ed.), Ethical theory: An anthology (2nd ed., pp. 485–498). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Kolker, A., Alvarez, L., & Center for New American Media (1986). American tongues [videorecording/]. New York, NY: The Center.Google Scholar
  19. Kurganov, S. Y. (2009). Reading and literature in the primary and middle Schools of the dialogue of cultures. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47(2), 30–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Corp.Google Scholar
  22. Lensmire, T. J. (1997). The teacher as Dostoevskian novelist. Research in the Teaching of English, 31(3), 367–392.Google Scholar
  23. Liston, D. P., & Zeichner, K. M. (1996). Culture and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  24. Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2016). “Spoilsport” in drama education vs. dialogic pedagogy. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 4, A45–A80. http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/151/113.  https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2016.151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marjanovic-Shane, A., Meacham, S., Choi, H. J., Lopez, S., & Matusov, E. (2018, in press). Idea-dying in critical ontological democratic dialogue in classrooms. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.10.001.
  26. Matusov, E. (2009a). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Matusov, E. (2009b). The school of the dialogue of cultures pedagogical movement in Ukraine and Russia. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Matusov, E. (2011a). Authorial teaching and learning. In E. J. White & M. Peters (Eds.), Bakhtinian pedagogy: Opportunities and challenges for research, policy and practice in education across the globe (pp. 21–46). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Matusov, E. (2011b). Irreconcilable differences in Vygotsky’s and Bakhtin’s approaches to the social and the individual: An educational perspective. Culture & Psychology, 17(1), 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matusov, E. (2017). Nikolai N. Konstantinov’s authorial math pedagogy for people with wings: Special issue. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 54(1), 1–117.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2017.1352391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matusov, E. (2018). Chronotopic analysis of values in critical ontological dialogic pedagogy. In A. U. Branco & M. C. Lopes-de-Oliveira (Eds.), Alterity, values and socialization: Human development within educational contexts (pp. 1–29). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Matusov, E., Baker, D., Fan, Y., Choi, H. J., & Hampel, R. L. (2017). Magic Learning Pill: Ontological and instrumental learning in order to speed up education. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(3), 456–476.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s121240-179-3848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Matusov, E., & Brobst, J. (2013). Radical experiment in dialogic pedagogy in higher education and its centaur failure: Chronotopic analysis. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2012). Diverse approaches to education: Alienated learning, closed and open participatory socialization, and critical dialogue. Human Development, 55(3), 159–166.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000339594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2015). Typology of critical dialogue and power relations in Democratic Dialogic Education. In K. Jezierska & L. Koczanowicz (Eds.), Democracy in dialogue, dialogue in democracy (pp. 211–229). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  36. Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2016). Dialogic authorial approach to creativity in education: Transforming a deadly homework into a creative activity. In V. P. Glăveanu (Ed.), The palgrave handbook of creativity and culture research (pp. 307–325). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Matusov, E., & Miyazaki, K. (2014). Dialogue on dialogic pedagogy. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 2, SI:ddp-1–SI:ddp-47.  https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2014.121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Matusov, E., & von Duyke, K. (2010). Bakhtin’s notion of the Internally persuasive discourse in education: Internal to what? (A case of discussion of issues of foul language in teacher education). In K. Junefelt & P. Nordin (Eds.), Proceedings from the second international interdisciplinary conference on Perspectives and Limits of Dialogism in Mikhail Bakhtin Stockholm University, Sweden June 3–5, 2009 (pp. 174–199). Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  39. Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Han, S. (2012). Community of learners: Ontological and non-ontological projects. Outlines: Critical Social Studies, 14(1), 41–72.Google Scholar
  40. Morson, G. S. (2004). The process of ideological becoming. In A. F. Ball & S. W. Freedman (Eds.), Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning (pp. 317–331). Cambridge, UK/New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Solomadin, I., & Kurganov, S. Y. (2009). The history of world culture as dialogue of cultures middle and high school curricula. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47(2), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tyson, C. A. (1999). “Shut my mouth wide open”: Realistic fiction and social action. Theory Into Practice, 38(3), 156–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. von Duyke, K. (2013). Students’ agency, autonomy, and emergent learning interests in two open democratic schools (PhD thesis). University of Delaware, Newark.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugene Matusov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ana Marjanovic-Shane
    • 2
  • Mikhail Gradovski
    • 3
  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Independent ScholarPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.University of StavangerStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations