Advertisement

Chapter 1.1: Two Teaching Cases with Online Forum Discussions

  • Eugene MatusovEmail author
  • Ana Marjanovic-Shane
  • Mikhail Gradovski
Chapter

Abstract

All Bakhtinian teaching cases reported by the self-inspired Bakhtinian educators in our interviews with them were placed on an online discussion forum. In this chapter we present two of these teaching cases with their full online discussions. Case#11 (case numbers derive from the order in which they appeared on our discussion online forum—subsequently we started referring to these numbers in our analyses and further dialogues with our colleagues): Bakhtinian teaching as unfinalized dialogues between the consciousnesses of equal minds, by Tara Ratnam, India, and Case#9: Bakhtinian teaching as a messy chatting on a subject matter, by Dmitri Nikulin, USA. Cases#11 and #9 were chosen for this chapter based on the richness and the diversity of their online discussions. Due to the lack of space, we could not present more cases with their full online discussion.

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1961). Between past and future: Six exercises in political thought. New York, NY: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aukerman, M. S. (2013). Rereading comprehension pedagogies: Toward a dialogic teaching ethic that honors student sensemaking. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 1, A1–A31.Google Scholar
  4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bakhtin, M. M. (1991). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act (1st ed.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bakhtin, M. M. (1999). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  8. Berlyand, I. E. (2009). A few words about Bibler’s dialogics: The School of the Dialogue of Cultures conception and curriculum. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47(1), 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bibler, V. S. (1991). Михаил Михайлович Бахтин или поэтика культуры [Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin or the poetics of culture]. Moscow, Russia: Progress.Google Scholar
  10. Bibler, V. S. (2009). The foundations of the School of the Dialogue of Cultures Program. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47(1), 34–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Biesta, G. (2013). The beautiful risk of education. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Bloome, D., & Beauchemin, F. (2016). Languaging everyday life in classrooms. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 65(1), 152–165.Google Scholar
  13. Bohm, D., & Nichol, L. (2004). On dialogue (Routledge classics ed.). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Brock, E. (1990). Five ways to kill a man. London, UK: Enitharmon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cervetti, G. N., DiPardo, A. L., & Staley, S. J. (2014). Entering the conversation: Exploratory talk in middle school science. The Elementary School Journal, 114(4), 547–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Di Paolo, E., & De Jaegher, H. (2012). The interactive brain hypothesis. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 6(163).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00163.
  18. Emerson, C., & Holquist, M. (1991). Glossary. In Dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  19. Feryok, A. (2012). Activity theory and language teacher agency. The Modern Language Journal, 96(1), 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freire, P., Freire, A. M. A. J., & Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  21. Hodges, B. H., Steffensen, S. V., & Martin, J. E. (2012). Caring, conversing, and realizing values: New directions in language studies. Language Sciences, 34(5), 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Linell, P. (2016). On agency in situated languaging: Participatory agency and competing approaches. New Ideas in Psychology, 42, 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matusov, E. (2007). Applying Bakhtin scholarship on discourse in education: A critical review essay. Educational Theory, 57(2), 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2015). Rehabilitation of power in Democratic Dialogic Education. In K. Jezierska & L. Koczanowicz (Eds.), Democracy in dialogue, dialogue in democracy (pp. 193–209). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Matusov, E., Smith, M. P., Soslau, E., Marjanovic-Shane, A., & von Duyke, K. (2016). Dialogic education from and for authorial agency. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 4, A162–A197. http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/172/130.  https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2016.172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matusov, E., & von Duyke, K. (2010). Bakhtin’s notion of the Internally Persuasive Discourse in education: Internal to what? (A case of discussion of issues of foul language in teacher education). In K. Junefelt & P. Nordin (Eds.), Proceedings from the Second International Interdisciplinary Conference on perspectives and limits of dialogism in Mikhail Bakhtin Stockholm University, Sweden June 3–5, 2009 (pp. 174–199). Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  28. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Morson, G. S. (2004). The process of ideological becoming. In A. F. Ball & S. W. Freedman (Eds.), Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning (pp. 317–331). Cambridge, UK/New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nikulin, D. V. (2006). On dialogue. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  31. Nikulin, D. V. (2010). Dialectic and dialogue. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Popova, M. (2016). Legendary physicist David Bohm on the paradox of communication, the crucial difference between discussion and dialogue, and what is keeping us from listening to one another. http://tinyw.in/IZRi.
  33. Ratnam, T. (2016). My career trajectory as a teacher of English as second language in India: Narrative self construction through a dialogic lens. In P. Haworth & C. Craig (Eds.), The career trajectories of English language teachers (pp. 61–76). Oxford, UK: Symposium Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  34. Ricœur, P. (1991). Life in quest of narrative. In D. Wood (Ed.), On Paul Ricœur: Narrative and interpretation (pp. 34–47). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Ricœur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Shcherba, L. V. (1915). Vostochnoluzhitskoe narechie [An Eastern Sorbian dialect]. Petrograd, Russia: Kollins.Google Scholar
  37. Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective planes of activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Yakubinsky, L. P., & Eskin, M. (1997). On dialogic speech. PMLA, 112(2), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugene Matusov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ana Marjanovic-Shane
    • 2
  • Mikhail Gradovski
    • 3
  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Independent ScholarPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.University of StavangerStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations