Advertisement

Is There an End to the Concentration of Businesses and People?

  • Urban Lindgren
  • Jonathan Borggren
  • Svante Karlsson
  • Rikard H Eriksson
  • Bram Timmermans
Chapter

Abstract

There is extensive literature describing the mechanisms of economic growth, which has tended to occur in big cities. The emergence of knowledge economies has enhanced the importance of human capital—the success of companies is increasingly dependent on employees’ ability to transform their knowledge and skills into new products that can satisfy rapidly changing demand from all over the world. This transformation of the economy creates major challenges for regions that do not have large, well-educated populations. Will rural areas stand a chance against the centripetal forces of agglomeration economies? This issue is addressed by focusing attention on a number of successful, forest-related companies running their operations far from metropolitan Sweden. This presentation is accompanied by a theoretical discussion that challenges the urban assumption.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J. (2006). How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth? Innovations, 1(1), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., & Storey, D. (2004). Introduction: Entrepreneurship and economic development. Regional Studies, 38(8), 871–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alonso, W. (1973). Urban zero population growth. Daedalus, 102(4), 191–206.Google Scholar
  4. Amcoff, J., & Westholm, E. (2007). Understanding rural change—Demography as a key to the future. Futures, 39, 363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amoros, J. E., & Bosma, N. (2014). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2013 global report: Fifteen years of assessing entrepreneurship across the globe. Retrieved from www.gemconsortium.org
  6. Amin, A. (2004). An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development. In T. J. Barnes, J. Peck, E. Sheppard, & A. Tickell (Eds.), Reading economic geography (pp. 48–58). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Antonsson, H., & Jansson, U. (2011). Introduction. Agriculture and forestry in a century of change. In H. Antonsson & U. Jansson (Eds.), Agriculture and forestry in Sweden since 1900. Stockholm: The Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry.Google Scholar
  8. Arrow, K. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Asheim, B. (2009). Guest editorial: introduction to the creative class in European city regions. Economic Geography, 85(4), 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Asheim, B., & Hansen, H. K. (2009). Knowledge bases, talents and contexts: On the usefulness of the creative class approach in Sweden. Economic Geography, 85(4), 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (2002). Growth regimes over time and space. Regional Studies, 36(2), 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beaverstock, J. V., Hubbard, P., & Rennie Short, J. (2004). Getting away with it? Exposing the geographies of the super-rich. Geoforum, 35, 401–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beland Lindahl, K., & Westholm, E. (2011). Food, paper, wood, or energy? Global trends and future Swedish forest use. Forests, 22(1), 51–65.Google Scholar
  15. Birch, D. L. (1981). Who creates jobs? The Public Interest, 65, 3–14.Google Scholar
  16. Borggren, J. (2011). Kreativa individers bostadsområden och arbetsställen. Belysta mot bakgrund av näringslivets omvandling och förändringar i bebyggelsestrukturen i Göteborg. Department of Human and Economic Geography: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  17. Borggren, J., & Eriksson, R. H. (2014). Human capital, skills and uneven intra-urban employment growth: The case of Göteborg, Sweden 1990–2008. Urban Studies Research. Article ID 260813.Google Scholar
  18. Borggren, J., Eriksson, R. H., & Lindgren, U. (2016). Knowledge flows in high-impact firms: How does relatedness influence survival, acquisition and exit? Journal of Economic Geography, 16, 637–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bornhäll, A., Daunfeldt, S.-O., & Rudholm, N. (2015). Sleeping gazelles: The unseen job creators? In A. C. Corbett, J. A. Katz, & A. Mckelvie (Eds.), Entrepreneurial growth: Individual, firm, and region (advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, volume 17) (pp. 161–185). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Boschma, R., Eriksson, R., & Lindgren, U. (2009). How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2), 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Boschma, R., Eriksson, R., & Lindgren, U. (2014). Labour market externalities and regional growth in Sweden: The importance of labour mobility between skill-related industries. Regional Studies, 48(10), 1669–1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2012). Raising the batting average: Re-orientating regional industrial policy to generate more high growth firms. Local Economy, 27, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Burger, M. J., Meijers, E. J., Hoogerbrugge, M., & Tresserra, J. M. (2015). Borrowed size, agglomeration shadows and cultural amenities in north-west Europe. European Planning Studies, 23(6), 1090–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2015). Second-rank city dynamics: Theoretical interpretations behind their growth potentials. European Planning Studies, 23(6), 1041–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clark, T. N. (2003). Urban amenities: Lakes, opera and juice bars—Do they drive development? In T. N. Clark (Ed.), The city as an entertainment machine (research in urban policy, volume 9) (pp. 103–140). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Clark, T. N., Lloyd, R., Wong, K. K., & Jain, P. (2002). Amenities drive urban growth. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(5), 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Clark, W. A. V., & Huang, Y. (2003). The life course and residential mobility in British housing markets. Environment and Planning A, 35, 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Coad, A., Daunfeldt, S.-O., Johansson, D., & Wennberg, K. (2014). Who do high-growth firms hire? Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 293–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Desrochers, P., & Leppälä, S. (2011). Opening up the ‘Jacobs Spillovers’ black box: Local diversity, creativity and the processes underlying new combinations. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(5), 843–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dicken, P. (2004). Geographers and ‘globalization’: (Yet) another missed boat? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dicken, P. (2015). Global shift. Mapping the changing contours of the world economy. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Diesen, M. (1998). Economics of the pulp and paper industry. Finnish Paper Engineers Association.Google Scholar
  33. Eriksson, R. H. (2011). Localized spillovers and knowledge flows: How does proximity influence the performance of plats? Economic Geography, 87(1), 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eriksson, R. H., & Hane-Weijman, E. (2015). How do regional economies respond to crises? The geography of job creation and destruction in Sweden (1990–2010). European Urban and Regional Studies, 1–17. doi: 10.1177/0969776415604016.
  35. Essletzbichler, J. (2004). The geography of job creation and destruction in the US manufacturing sector, 1967–1997. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(3), 602–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Feldman, H. R. (2001). Strategies for nursing leadership. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Florida, R. (2004). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life (Paperback ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  38. Flygare, I., & Isacson, M. (2003). Jordbruket i välfärdssamhället: 1945–2000. Det svenska jordbrukets historia. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur i samrbete med Nordiska museet och Stift.Google Scholar
  39. Fountain, J., & Hall, C. M. (2002). The impact of lifestyle migration on rural communities: A case study of Akaroa, New Zealand. In A. M. Williams & C. M. Hall (Eds.), Tourism and migration: New relationship between production and consumption (pp. 153–168). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Fransson, U. (1997). Ungdomars hushållsbildning—Processer på en lokal arbetsmarknad. Kulturgeografiska Institutionen. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
  41. Frey, K. B., & Osborne, M. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Working Paper, Oxford Martin School.Google Scholar
  42. Glaeser, E. L. (2000). The new economies of urban and regional growth. In Clark, G. L., Feldman, M. P., & Gertler, M. S. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of economic geography (pp. 83–98). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H., Scheinkman, J., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1126–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gordon, D. M., Edwards, R., & Reich, M. (1982). Segmented work, divided workers: The historical transformation of labor in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Hay, I. (2013). Geographies of the super-rich. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hart, M., & McGuinness, S. (2003). Small firm growth in UK regions 1994–1997: Towards an explanatory framework. Regional Studies, 37(2), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Håkansson, J. (2000). Changing population distribution in Sweden—Long term trends and contemporary tendencies. Gerum Kulturgeografi, 2000:1. Umeå: Umeå University.Google Scholar
  48. Hansen, H. K., & Niedomysl, T. (2009). Migration of the creative class: Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harvey, D. (2011). Roepke lecture in economic geography: Crises, geographic disruptions and the uneven development of political responses. Economic Geography, 87(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  50. Haugen, K., Karlsson, S., & Westin, K. (2015). New forest owners: Change and continuity in the characteristics of Swedish non-industrial private forest owners (NIPFs) 1990–2010. Manuscript, Department of Geography and Economic History, Umeå University, Umeå.Google Scholar
  51. Haugen, K., & Lindgren, U. (2013). On the importance of forest assets for micro-firm performance. Fennia, 191(2), 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Henderson, V., Kuncoro, A., & Turner, M. (1995). Industrial development in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 103(5), 1067–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hoogvelt, A. (1997). The history of capitalist expansion. In A. Hoogvelt (Eds.), Globalisation and the postcolonial world. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  54. Hultdins. (2016). Webpage: http://hultdins.se/om/ (2016-05-10).
  55. Hymer, S. (1972). The internationalization of capital. Journal of Economic Issues, 6(1), 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Indexator. (2016). Webpage: http://www.indexator.se/en-GB/om-oss/historia/ (2016-06-01).
  57. Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  58. Jonsson, R., Egnell, G., & Baudin, A. (2011). Swedish forest sector outlook. Future Forests Working Report. www.mistra.org/program/futuresforests/hem/publikationer
  59. Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  60. Larsson, S., & Malmberg, A. (1999). Innovations, competitiveness and local embeddedness: A study of machinery producers in Sweden. Geografiska Annaler B, 81(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lindgren, U. (2003). Who is the counter-urban mover? Evidence from the Swedish urban system. International Journal of Population Geography, 9, 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lindgren, U., Pettersson, Ö., Jansson, B., & Nilsagård, H. (2000). Skogsbruket i den lokala ekonomin. Skogsstyrelsen rapport nr 4 2000, Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsens förlag.Google Scholar
  63. Lundholm, E. (2007a). New motives for migration? On interregional mobility in the nordic context. Umeå: Department of Social and Economic Geography, Umeå University.Google Scholar
  64. Lundholm, E. (2007b). Are movers still the same? Characteristics of interregional migrants in Sweden 1970–2001. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98(3), 336–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lundvall, B.-Å., & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lyons, D. (1995). Changing business opportunities: The geography of rapidly growing small US private firms, 1982–1992. The Professional Geographer, 47(4), 388–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Marjavaara, R. (2008). Second home tourism: The root to displacement in Sweden? Department of Social and Economic Geography. Umeå: Umeå University.Google Scholar
  68. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan. Retrieved October 2, 2015, from http://www.econlib.org/library/Marshall/marP1.html
  69. Maskell, P., & Malmberg, A. (1999). Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Massey, D. (1984). Spatial divisions of labour: Social structures and the geography of production. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
  71. Massey, D. (2004). Uneven development: Social change and the spatial divisions of labor. In T. J. Barnes, J. Peck, E. Sheppard, & A. Tickell (Eds.), Reading economic geography (pp. 111–124). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mayer, H., & Baumgartner, D. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship and innovation in peripheral regions. The Planning Review, 50(1), 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. de Meza, D. (2002). Overlending? The Economic Journal, 112(477), F17–F31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Moretti, E. (2013). The new geography of jobs. New York: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
  75. Mulder, C. H. (2007). The family context and residential choice: A challenge for new research. Population, Space and Place, 13(4), 265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Niedomysl, T. (2008). Residential preferences for interregional migration in Sweden: Demographic, socioeconomic and geographical determinants. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1109–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Niedomysl, T. (2011). How migration motives change over distance: Evidence on variations across socioeconomic and demographic groups. Regional Studies, 45(6), 843–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Nightingale, P., & Coad, A. (2014). Muppets and gazelles: Political and methodological biases in entrepreneurship research. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 113–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ohmae, K. (1995). The end of the nation-state. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  81. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  82. Pettersson, R., & Jansson, U. (2011). Sveriges nationalatlas: Jordbrukets och skogsbrukets betydelse sedan år 1900. SNA.Google Scholar
  83. Pissarides, C. A. (1994). Search unemployment with on-the-job search. Review of Economic Studies, 61(3), 457–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Porter, M. E. (1998). On competition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  86. Ritsilä, J., & Tervo, H. (2002). Effects of unemployment on new firm formation: Micro-level panel data evidence from Finland. Small Business Economics, 19(1), 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Robertsson, L., & Marjavaara, R. (2015). The seasonal buzz: Knowledge transfer in a temporary setting. Tourism Planning and Development, 12(3), 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sæther, B., Isaksen, A., & Karlsen, A. (2011). Innovation by co-evolution in natural resource industries: The Norwegian experience. Geoforum, 42, 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schön, L. (2007).Google Scholar
  91. Scott, A. J. (1998). Regions and the world economy: The coming shape of global production, competition and political order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Scott, A. J. (2006). Creative cities: Conceptual issues and policy questions. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  94. Skogsindustrierna. (2016). Branschstatistik, 2015.Google Scholar
  95. Stam, E. (2005). Window on the Netherlands: The geography of gazelles in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(1), 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Stjernström, O. (1998). Flytta nära, långt bort: de sociala nätverkens betydelse för val av bostadsort. Umeå: Kulturgeografiska Institutionen, Umeå Universitet.Google Scholar
  97. Storper, M., & Scott, A. J. (2009). Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2), 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Storper, M., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4), 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Swedish Forest Industries Federation. (2008). The Forest Industry—A Natural Part of Sweden. Sweden. Online at: Swedish Forest Industries Federation, Stockholm. http://www.forestindustries.se/web/Publications_and_surveys.aspx Google Scholar
  100. Tillväxtanalys. (2012). Från aktiv lokaliseringspolitik till regional politik. Working Paper, 2012, 18.Google Scholar
  101. Törnqvist, G. (1963). Studier i industrilokalisering. Meddelanden från geografiska institutionen vid Stockholms universitet Nr. 153. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  102. Törnqvist, G. (1996). Sverige I nätverkens Europa: gränsöverskridandets former och villkor. Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
  103. Van Oort, F., de Geus, S., & Dogaru, T. (2015). Related variety and regional economic growth in a cross-section of European urban regions. European Planning Studies, 23(6), 1110–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wallander, J. (1948). Flykten från skogsbygden. Stockholm: Industrins Utredningsinstitut.Google Scholar
  105. Wastensson, L., & Nilsson, L.-E. (Eds.). (1990). National atlas of Sweden. The Forests. Jönköping: The National Board of Forestry.Google Scholar
  106. Westerlund, O. (2001). Arbetslöshet, arbetsmarknadspolitik och geografisk rörlighet. Ekonomisk Debatt, 29(4), 263–272.Google Scholar
  107. Weber, A. (1899). The growth of cities in the 19th century: A study in statistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  108. Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Urban Lindgren
    • 1
  • Jonathan Borggren
    • 1
  • Svante Karlsson
    • 1
  • Rikard H Eriksson
    • 1
  • Bram Timmermans
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Geography and Economic HistoryUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  2. 2.Department of Strategy and ManagementNorwegian School of EconomicsBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations