Advertisement

Environmental Restriction in Multi-Owned Property

  • Erika Altmann
  • Phillipa Watson
  • Michelle Gabriel
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine impediments to environmentally sustainable and energy-efficient change in multi-owned properties and how this impacts on the capacity of the strata community to achieve economic and environmental goals. Our research identifies four major impediments to sustainable adaptation in the Australian context. First, there are missed opportunities to integrate core environmental sustainability principles into initial design and construction. Second, centralised systems create difficulties in terms of facilitating consumer awareness of on-site energy and water use and waste. Third, decision-making for environmentally sustainable adaptation of dwellings is complex with strata managers remaining key gatekeepers of environmental and financial product information in this process. Finally, the market does not provide appropriate financing mechanisms to facilitate loans within the multi-owned property sector.

References

  1. Altmann, E. 2014. Apartments, Co-ownership and Sustainability: Implementation Barriers for Retrofitting the Built Environment. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 16 (4): 437–457.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Building Codes Board (ABCB). 2016a. National Construction Code Volume One: Building Code of Australia Class 2 to Class 9 Buildings. Canberra: Australian Building Codes Board.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2016b. National Construction Code Volume Three: Plumbing Code of Australia. Canberra: Australian Building Codes Board.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2016c. National Construction Code Volume Two: Building Code of Australia Class 1 and Class 10 Buildings. Canberra: Australian Building Codes Board.Google Scholar
  5. Australian PV Institute (APVI). 2015. http://apvi.org.au/solar-research-conference/2015-apsrc-proceedings/. Accessed 29 Apr 2016.
  6. Bunker, R. 2014. How Is the Compact City Faring in Australia? Planning, Practice & Research 29 (5): 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. City of Melbourne. 2015. Grants and Sponsorships. http://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/about-council/governance-transparency/Pages/grants-and-sponsorships.aspx. Accessed 29 July 2015.
  8. Fensom, A. 2015. Asia’s Urbanization ‘Just Beginning’. The Diplomat, January 30. http://thediplomat.com/2015/01/asias-urbanization-just-beginning. Accessed 1 Sept 2016.
  9. Gabriel, M., P. Watson, R. Ong, W. Wood, and M. Wulff. 2010. The Environmental Sustainability of Australia’s Private Rental Stock, Ed. J. Davison, 1–113, AHURI Final Report No. 159. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, Southern Research Centre Western Australia Research Centre RMIT Research Centre Swinburne-Monash Research Centre.Google Scholar
  10. Green Building Council of Australia (GBCA). 2015a. Green Building Council of Australia. http://new.gbca.org.au/. Accessed 1 Oct 2015.
  11. Hu, H., S. Geertman, and P. Hooimeijer. 2014. Green Apartments in Nanjing China: Do Developers and Planners Understand the Valuation by Residents? Housing Studies 29 (1): 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang, B., V. Mauerhofer, and Y. Geng. 2016. Analysis of Existing Building Energy Saving Policies in Japan and China. Journal of Cleaner Production 112: 1510–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hwang, B.X., Y. Zhao, Y. Lin See, and Y. Zhong. 2015. Addressing Risks in Green Retrofit Projects: The Case of Singapore. Project Management Journal 46: 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Levinson, A., and S. Niemann. 2004. Energy Use by Apartment Tenants When Landlords Pay for Utilities. Resource and Energy Economics 26 (1): 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, G.-Z., Q.-Q. Wang, and J.-L. Wang. 2014. Chinese Standard Requirements on Indoor Environmental Quality for Assessment of Energy-Efficient Buildings. Indoor and Built Environment 23 (2): 194–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lo, A.Y., and C.Y. Jim. 2010. Willingness of Residents to Pay and Motives for Conservation of Urban Green Spaces in the Compact City of Hong Kong. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 9 (2): 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Low, S.P. 2011. Building and Sustainability Controls in Singapore: A Journey in Time. Procedia Engineering 20: 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maller, C., R. Horne, and T. Dalton. 2012. Green Renovations: Intersections of Daily Routines, Housing Aspirations and Narratives of Environmental Sustainability. Housing, Theory and Society 29 (3): 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rex, J., and R. Leshinsky. 2012. Understanding the Knowledge and Information Requirements for Sustainable Retrofits: A Two Stage Study of Apartment Owners in Melbourne, Australia. Swinburne University of Technology, June.Google Scholar
  20. Sharam, A., L. Bryant, and T. Alves. 2015. Making Apartments Affordable: Moving from Speculative to Deliberative Development. Melbourne: Swinburne Institute for Social Research, June.Google Scholar
  21. Stake, R.E. 2010. Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. Vol. 244. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Strata Communities Australia (Victoria) (SCA). 2015. Policy Position. http://www.vic.stratacommunity.org.au/documents/Vic%20Documents/SCA%20(Vic)%20%20Policy%20Position%20v7.1%204%20February%202015.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2016.
  23. Strata Community Australia. 2016. Smart Blocks: Tune Up Your Building. http://smartblocks.com.au/working-with-strata/. Accessed 17 Aug 2016.
  24. United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). 2015. Narrowing the Emissions Gap: Contributions from Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Activities, The Gigaton Coalition Coordinate by UNEP, France. http://www.1gigatoncoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/1-gigaton-coalition-report-narrowing-the-emissions-gap.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2016.
  25. ———. 2016. Green Energy Choices: The Benefits, Risks, and Trade-Offs of Low-Carbon Technologies for Electricity Production. Report of the International Resource Panel. E.G. Hertwich, J. Aloisi de Larderel, A. Arvesen, P. Bayer, J. Bergesen, E. Bouman, T. Gibon, G. Heath, C. Peña, P. Purohit, A. Ramirez, and S. Suh, UNEP, France. file:///C:/Users/home/Downloads/Green_energy_choices__The_benefits,_risks_and_trade-offs_of_low-carbon_technologies_for_electricity_production__Summary_for_policy_makers-2015green_e.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2016.Google Scholar
  26. Yau, Y. 2012. Eco-Labels and Willingness-to-Pay: A Hong Kong Study. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment 1 (3): 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erika Altmann
    • 1
  • Phillipa Watson
    • 2
  • Michelle Gabriel
    • 2
  1. 1.Tasmanian School of Business and EconomicsUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  2. 2.School of SociologyUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations