Impediments to Effective Strata Governance

  • Nicole Johnston
  • Eric Too


Effective governance is an essential component in the establishment of a successful strata title scheme. This chapter examines the role and influence of developers in the establishment of governance arrangements prior to and following the registration of a strata title scheme in Australia. The chapter examines the rights of the developer in the initial stage of project development and the consequences of such rights for a scheme’s reputation, functionality and viability. Drawing on a case study of strata development in Queensland, the paper identifies common practices that thwart effective governance. The case highlights that poor decision-making from the outset can impose a structure which leads to poor outcomes for the owners’ corporations for many years to come.


  1. Aguilera, R.V., and A. Cuervo-Cazurra. 2009. Codes of Good Governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review 17 (3): 376–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, M., and N. Johnston. 2013. Partial Statutory Framework for Developer and Body Corporate Relationship. Paper Presented at the Strata and Community Title in Australia for the 21st Century Conference, September, Gold Coast.Google Scholar
  3. Altmann, E., and Z. Yang. 2017. Why Chinese Investors Find Australian Real Estate So Alluring. The Conversation. Accessed 1 May 2017.
  4. Blandy, S., J. Dixon, and A. Dupuis. 2006. Theorising Power Relationships in Multi-owned Residential Developments: Unpacking the Bundle of Rights. Urban Studies 43 (13): 2365–2383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. 1992. Report with Code of Best Practice [Cadbury Report]. London: Gee Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Desender, K.A., R.V. Aguilera, R. Crespi, and M. Garcia-Cestona. 2013. When Does Ownership Matter? Board Characteristics and Behaviour. Strategic Management Journal 34 (7): 823–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Easthope, H., J. Warnken, C. Sherry, C.E. Coiacetto, D. Dredge, C. Guilding, N. Johnston, D. Lamminmaki, and S. Reid. 2014. How Property Title Impacts Urban Consolidation: A Life Cycle Examination of Multi-title Developments. Urban Policy and Research 32 (3): 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grindle, M. 2010. Good Governance: The Inflation of an Idea, Faculty Research Working Paper Series, RWP10-023. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  9. Hyatt, W.S., and J.B. Rhoads. 1976. Concepts of Liability in the Development and Administration of Condominium and Home Owners Associations. Wake Forest Law Review 12 (4): 915–977.Google Scholar
  10. Johnston, N., and E. Too. 2015. Multi-owned Properties in Australia: A Governance Typology of Issues and Outcomes. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 8 (4): 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnston, N., C. Guilding, and S. Reid. 2012. Examining Developer Actions that Embed Protracted Conflict and Dysfunctionality in Staged Multi-owned Residential Schemes. Paper Presented at the 18th Annual Pacific-Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Adelaide, Johnston, January 15–18.Google Scholar
  12. Klakegg, O.J., T. Williams, O.M. Magnussen, and H. Glasspool. 2008. Governance Frameworks for Public Project Development and Estimation. Project Management Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Kumar, P., and A. Zattoni. 2013. Corporate Governance, Board of Directors, and Firm Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review 21 (4): 311–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller, R., and D.R. Lessard. 2000. The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects: Shaping Institutions, Risk and Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Muller, R. 2009. Project Governance. London: Gower.Google Scholar
  16. Queensland Land Registry. Community Management Statements for Sphere Southport. Living Community Titles Scheme 37951 dated 2008, 2011 and 2013.Google Scholar
  17. Ruhanen, L., N. Scott, B. Ritchie, and A. Tkaczynski. 2010. Governance: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Tourism Review 65 (4): 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sherry, C. 2010. Long-term Management Contracts and Developer Abuse in New South Wales. In Multi-owned Housing: Law Power and Practice, ed. J. Dixon, A. Dupuis, and S. Blandy, 15–176. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1997. A Survey of Corporate Governance. Journal of Finance 52 (2): 737–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Too, E., and P. Weaver. 2014. The Management of Project Management: A Conceptual Framework for Project Governance. International Journal of Project Management 32 (8): 1382–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar


  1. Body Corporate and Community Management. Act 1997 (Qld). Google Scholar
  2. Body Corporate and Community Management. (Standard Module) Regulation 2008 (Qld). Google Scholar
  3. Owners Corporations. Act 2006 (Vic). Google Scholar
  4. Strata Schemes Management. Act 1996 (NSW). Google Scholar
  5. Subdivision. Act 1988 (Vic). Google Scholar
  6. Uniform Condominium. Act (USA). Google Scholar


  1. Sphere Southport Living [2013]. QBCCMCmr 338. Google Scholar
  2. Sphere Southport Living [2014]. QBCCMCmr 186. Google Scholar
  3. Sitting Bear Pty Ltd. (receivers and managers appointed) v Body Corporate for Sphere Southport Living CTS 37951 (2014) QCAT (APL 444–13). Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole Johnston
    • 1
  • Eric Too
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of FinanceDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
  2. 2.School of Property, Construction and Project ManagementRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations