Advertisement

Promoting Owner Participation in Management

  • Lisa Wei Gao
Chapter

Abstract

The housing reform that started in 1978 has resulted in the proliferation of multi-owned property (MOP) in China. Unfortunately, Chinese MOP owners have been slow to embrace building care culture. Within this background, this book chapter aims to explore the following two questions. First, what are the institutional barriers to engaging MOP owners with management activities? Second, under the same institutional system, what are the determinants of participation behaviour of MOP owners in management? For the first question, the book chapter presents a brief but critical review of the Chinese institutional system by comparing it with those of other Asian countries. For the second question, it conducts an empirical study of owner participation by using data extracted from the Chinese General Society Survey 2010. The findings in this chapter have implications for the formulation of government policies which aim to promote owner participation in management.

References

  1. Chen, L., and H. Mostert. 2007. The Unavoidable Necessity of Formalizing Condominium Ownership in China: A Pilot Study. Asian Journal of Comparative Law 2 (1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng, P. 2013. A Study on Owners Committee in State-Market-Society Perspective: Based on the Community Ethnographic Investigation in B City. Journal of Public Management 10 (3): 75–89.Google Scholar
  3. Conway, B.P., and D.S. Hachen. 2005. Attachments, Grievances, Resources, and Efficacy: The Determinants of Tenants Association Participation Among Public Housing Tenants. Journal of Urban Affairs 27 (1): 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deng, F. 2014. Why Couldn’t the Neighbourhood Committee Replace HOA in China? Working paper. Chongqing: Chongqing Technology & Business University.Google Scholar
  5. Guo, R.X., D.L. Li, and J. Li. 2008. Research on Special Maintenance Fund Management Based on Condominium Ownership Theory. Construction Economy 12: 20–21.Google Scholar
  6. Huang, X.X. 2013. State Strategic Actions at the Grass-Roots Levels and Community Process: A Community Story of Autonomous Governance by the Owners of Nanyuan. Society 4: 148–175.Google Scholar
  7. Li, L.M., and S.M. Li. 2013. Becoming Homeowners: The Emergence and Use of Online Neighborhood Forums in Transitional Urban China. Habitat International 38: 232–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu, A. 2012. The Dilemma Faced by the Owners’ Committee. Urban Problems 03: 98–102.Google Scholar
  9. Ostrom, E. 1999. Design Principles and Threats to Sustainable Organisations That Manage Commons. Paper Presented at the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis W99-6 Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  10. Sampson, R.J., S.W. Raudenbush, and F. Earls. 1997. Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy. Science 277 (5328): 918–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Talo, C., T. Mannarini, and A. Rochira. 2014. Sense of Community and Community Participation: A Meta-analytic Review. Social Indicator Research 117: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tomba, L.G. 2005. Residential Space and Collective Interest Formation in Beijing’s Housing Disputes. The China Quarterly 184: 934–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang, F. 2013. Determinants of the Effectiveness of Chinese Homeowner Associations in Solving Neighbourhood Issues. Urban Affairs Review 50: 311–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang, J.S., and J. Wu. 2010. A Study of Maintenance Funds Management Problems and Their Solutions. Modern Property 9 (11): 23–25.Google Scholar
  15. Wang, H.S., and W. Ying. 2011. Visible and Invisible State in Grass-roots Society: Episodes in a Commercial Housing Enclave. Sociological Studies 1: 63–95.Google Scholar
  16. Yau, Y. 2010. Sense of Community and Homeowner Participation in Housing Management: A Study of Hong Kong. Urbani izziv 21 (1): 126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yau, Yung. 2011. Collectivism and Activism in Housing Management in Hong Kong. Habitat International 35 (2): 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2014. Perceived Efficacies and Collectivism in Multi-owned Housing Management. Habitat International 43: 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yip, N.M., and Y.H. Jiang. 2011. Homeowners United: The Attempt to Create Lateral Networks of Homeowners’ Associations in Urban China. Journal of Contemporary China 20 (72): 735–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yip, N.M., R.G. Huang, and X.Y. Sun. 2014. Homeowners’ Activism and the Rule of Law in Urban China. China Journal of Social Work 7 (2): 175–188.Google Scholar
  21. Zhu, Y.S. 2015. Toward Community Engagement: Can the Built Environment Help? Grassroots Participation and Communal Space in Chinese Urban Communities. Habitat International 46: 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhu, Y.S., W. Breitung, and S.M. Li. 2012. The Changing Meaning of Neighborhood Attachment in Chinese Commodity Housing Estates: Evidence from Guangzhou. Urban Studies 49 (11): 2439–2457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa Wei Gao
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Public Policy and ManagementGuangxi UniversityNanningChina

Personalised recommendations