Advertisement

The Changing Language of Urban Youth: A Pilot Study

  • Rob Drummond
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes the speech of a small group of adolescents (14–16 years old) in inner-city Manchester following an ethnographically informed sociolinguistic pilot study carried out in 2013. The young people had all been excluded from mainstream schools and so were being educated in two learning centres within Manchester’s Pupil Referral Unit. The chapter has two aims: firstly, to provide a description of the linguistic features that make up the current spoken language of a small group of young people in a particular context in Manchester. The description will involve comparison to existing accounts of Manchester English, in addition to work carried out in London. Secondly, to explore some of the social factors behind the observed variation, highlighting problems with looking at social categories such as gender and ethnicity, before going on to suggest a practice-based approach. In achieving this second aim, some reference is made to the subsequent follow-up study which is still in progress at the time of writing. The chapter is intended to offer an introduction to this area of ongoing research while outlining future directions.

References

  1. Baranowski, M., & Turton, D. (2015). Manchester English. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Researching Northern English (pp. 293–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beal, J. C. (2008). English dialects in the North of England: Phonology. In B. Kortmann & C. Upton (Eds.), Varieties of English. Vol. 1: The British Isles (pp. 122–144). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  3. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.4.18. Available online: http://www.praat.org/
  4. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchstaller, I. (2014). Quotatives: New trends and sociolinguistic implications. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Buchstaller, I., & D’Arcy, A. (2009). Localized globalization: A multi-local, multivariate investigation of quotative be like. Journal of SocioLinguistics, 13(3), 291–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cameron, D. (2009). Demythologising sociolinguistics. In N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (Eds.), The new sociolinguistics reader (pp. 106–118). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheshire, J., Kerswill, P., Fox, S., & Torgersen, E. (2011). Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of multicultural London English. Journal of SocioLinguistics, 15(2), 151–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drager, K. (2009). A sociophonetic ethnography of Selwyn Girls’ High. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Canterbury.Google Scholar
  10. Dray, S., & Drummond, R. (Forthcoming). Language variation-in-practice: Variationist and ethnographic research methods in collaboration. In K. Tustin (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistic ethnography. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Drummond, R. (2011). Glottal variation in /t/ in non-native English speech: Patterns of acquisition. English World-Wide, 32(3), 280–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drummond, R. (2012). Aspects of identity in a second language: ING variation in the speech of polish migrants living in Manchester, UK. Language Variation and Change, 24, 107–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drummond, R. (2013). The Manchester polish strut: Dialect acquisition in a second language. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(1), 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drummond, R. (2016). (Mis)interpreting urban youth language: white kids sounding black? Journal of Youth Studies, 1–21. Available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13676261.2016.1260692
  15. Drummond, R., & Dray, S. (2015, October). ‘Gimme dat ting’: Word initial th-stopping among urban British youth. Paper presented at NWAV 44, University of Toronto, 22–25.Google Scholar
  16. Drummond, R., & Schleef, E. (2016). Identity in variationist sociolinguistics. In S. Preece (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp. 50–65). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Fabricius, A., Watt, D., & Johnson, D. E. (2009). A comparison of three speaker-intrinsic vowel formant frequency normalization algorithms for sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change, 21(3), 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harding, N. (2013). Why are so many middle-class children speaking in Jamaican patois? A father of an 11-year-old girl laments a baffling trend. Daily Mail. 11th October. Available online: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2453613/Why-middle-class-children-speaking-Jamaican-patois-A-father-11-year-old-girl-laments-baffling-trend.html
  19. Howley, G. (2016). The acquisition of Manchester dialect variants by adolescent Roma migrants. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Salford.Google Scholar
  20. Hughes, A., Trudgill, P., & Watt, D. (2012). English accents and dialects: An introduction to social and regional varieties of English in the British Isles. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
  21. Johns, L. (2012). Do we really need to listen more to young people? I’m, not so sure. Mail Online. 13th December. Available online: http://johnsblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/12/do-we-really-need-to-listen-more-to-young-people-im-not-so-sure.html
  22. Kerswill, P. (2014). The objectification of ‘Jafaican’: The discoursal embedding of multicultural London English in the British media. In J. Androutsopoulos (Ed.), Mediatization and sociolinguistic change (pp. 428–455). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  23. Kerswill, P., Torgersen, E., & Fox, S. (2008). Reversing ‘drift’: Innovation and diffusion in the London diphthong system. Language Variation and Change, 20, 451–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mufwene, S. S. (2001). The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Quist, P. (2008). Sociolinguistic approaches to multiethnolect: Language variety and stylistic practice. International Journal of Bilingualism, 12, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schleef, E., & Turton, D. (2016). Sociophonetic variation of like in British dialects: effects of function, context and predictability. English Language and Linguistics, 1–41. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067431600023X
  27. Schleef, E., Flynn, N., & Ramsammy, M. (2015). Production and perception of (ing) in Manchester English. In E. Torgersen, S. Hårstad, B. Mæhlum, & U. Røyneland (Eds.), Language variation – European perspectives V (pp. 197–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  28. Svendsen, B. A., & Røyneland, U. (2008). Multiethnolectal facts and functions in Oslo, Norway. International Journal of Bilingualism, 12, 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Szakay, A., & Torgersen, E. (2015). An acoustic analysis of voice quality in London English: The effect of gender, ethnicity and f0. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th international congress of phonetic sciences. Glasgow: The University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
  30. Tollfree, L. (1999). South East London English: Discrete versus continuous modelling of consonantal reduction. In P. Foulkes & G. Docherty (Eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles (pp. 163–184). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Torgersen, E., & Szakay, A. (2012). An investigation of speech rhythm in London English. Lingua, 122(7), 822–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Torgersen, E., Gabrielatos, C., Hoffmann, S., & Fox, S. (2011). A corpus-based study of pragmatic markers in London English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 7(1), 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Turton, D., & Ramsammy, M. (2012, May). /ɪ,ə/−lowering in Manchest[ʌ]: Contextual patterns of gradient variabilit[ε]. Paper given at the 20th Manchester phonology meeting, University of Manchester, 24–26.Google Scholar
  34. Watson, C., & Harrington, J. (1999). Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 458–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wells, J. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wiese, H. (2009). Grammatical innovation in multiethnic urban Europe: New linguistic practices among adolescents. Lingua, 119, 782–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rob Drummond
    • 1
  1. 1.Manchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations