Advertisement

‘Doing Cornishness’ in the English Periphery: Embodying Ideology Through Anglo-Cornish Dialect Lexis

  • Rhys J. Sandow
  • Justyna A. Robinson
Chapter

Abstract

In the current chapter, we explore the social meaning of onomasiological variation of the concept lunch box among males in the Cornish town of Redruth. Collected data point us towards the relevance of the Anglo-Cornish dialect forms crib box and croust tin in projecting speakers’ regional identity. Speakers with a stronger sense of Cornish identity recognise, and ultimately use, local dialect lexis more than those with a weaker sense of Cornish identity. Also, declining local dialect terms occur more frequently in careful speech styles of older speakers. We argue that this unexpected pattern occurs because, when speakers are highly aware that their vocabulary is being observed, they ‘perform’ their Cornish identity through Anglo-Cornish dialect lexis. This study also showcases a new methodological framework for collecting data which allows us to analyse socio-semantic variation.

References

  1. Anderson, A. H., Bader, M., Bard, E. G., Boyle, E., Doherty, G., Garrod, S., Isard, S., Kowtko, J., McAllister, J., Miller, J., Sotillo, C., Thompson, H. S., & Weinert, R. (1991). The HCRC map task corpus. Language and Speech, 34(4), 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, R., & Hazan, V. (2011). DiapixUK: Task materials for the elicitation of multiple spontaneous speech dialogs. Behaviour Research Methods, 43(3), 761–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beal, J., & Burbano-Elizondo, L. (2012). ‘All the lads and lasses’: Lexical variation in Tyne and Wear. English Today, 28(4), 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaton, M. E., & Washington, H. B. (2015). Slurs and the indexical field: The pejoration and reclaiming of faveldo ‘slum-dweller’. Language Sciences, 52, 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beeching, K. (2011). The sociolinguistics of lexical variation in standard French: A diachronic perspective. In T. Pooley & D. Lagorgette (Eds.), On linguistic change in French: Sociohistorical approaches (pp. 37–53). Chambéry: University of Savoy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bewnans Kernow. (2014). Report on the Cornwall council Cornwall local plan strategic policies – Proposed submission document 2010–2030. Available online: http://www.bewnanskernow.org/uploads/2/3/1/8/23183698/bk_local_plan_april_2014.pdf
  7. Boberg, C. (2004). Real and apparent time: Late adoption of changes in Montreal English. American Speech, 79(3), 250–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyd, Z., Elliot, Z., Fruehwald, J., Hall-Lew, L., & Lawrence, D. (2015, April). An evaluation of sociolinguistic elicitation methods. Paper presented at the 18th international conference of the phonetic sciences, Glasgow, UK, 10–14 April.Google Scholar
  9. Bucholtz, M. (1999). “Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society, 28(2), 203–223.Google Scholar
  10. Burbano-Elizondo, L. (2008). Language variation and identity in Sunderland. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
  11. Chambers, J. K., & Trudgill, P. (1998). Dialectology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clegg, D. (2005). Cornwall & the Isles of Scilly: The complete guide. Trowbridge: Cromwell Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cooper, P. (2017). ‘Deregisterment’ and ‘fossil forms’: The cases of gan and mun in ‘Yorkshire’ dialect: The changes in what features constitute ‘Yorkshire’ dialect from the 19th century to the 21st. English Today, 33(1), 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coupland, N. (2007). Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dann, H. (2016). Language, identity and indexicality: A sociophonetic study of first generation in-migrants in Cornwall. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
  16. Deacon, B. (2007). Cornwall: A concise history. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
  17. Du Maurier, D. (1935). Jamaica Inn. London: Little, Brown and Company. reprinted in 2013.Google Scholar
  18. Du Maurier, D. (1938). Rebecca. London: Virago Press. reprinted in 2007.Google Scholar
  19. Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–476.Google Scholar
  21. Van Engen, K. J., Baese-Berk, M., Baker, R. E., Choi, A., Kim, M., & Bradlow, A. R. (2010). The wildcat corpus of native and foreign-accented English: Communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. Language and Speech, 53(4), 510–540.Google Scholar
  22. Ferdinand, S. (2013). A brief history of the Cornish language, its revival and its current status. E-Keltoi: Journal of Interdisciplinary Celtic Studies, 2, 199–227.Google Scholar
  23. Graham, W. (1945–2002). The Poldark novels (Vols. 1–12). London: Pan Macmillan. Reprinted in 2015.Google Scholar
  24. Hall, S. (1991). The local and the global: Globalization and ethnicity. In A. King (Ed.), Culture, globalization, and the world-system (pp. 19–40). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hughes, G. (2000). A history of English words. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Jenner, H. (1904). Preface to ‘A handbook of the Cornish language’. In D. R. Williams (Ed.), Henry and Katherine Jenner: A celebration of Cornwall’s culture, language, and identity (pp. 49–55). London: Francis Boutle (2004).Google Scholar
  27. Johnson, E. (1993). The relationship between lexical variation and lexical change. Language Variation and Change, 5(3), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnstone, B. (2011). Making Pittsburghese: Communication technology, expertise, and the discursive construction of a regional dialect. Language & Communication, 31(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kennedy, N. (2016). Cornish solidarity: Using culture to strengthen communities. Port Laoise: Evertype.Google Scholar
  30. Kent, A. M. (2013). Towards a Cornish philosophy: Values, thought, and language for the West Britons in the twenty-first century. Port Laoise: Evertype.Google Scholar
  31. Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  32. Labov, W. (1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In J. Baugh & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Language in use: Readings in sociolinguistics (pp. 28–54). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Llamas, C. (1999). A new methodology: Data elicitation for social and regional language variation studies. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, 7, 95–118.Google Scholar
  34. McColl Millar, R., Barras, W., & Bonnici, L. M. (2014). Lexical variation and attrition in the Scottish fishing communities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Merton, L. (2003). Oall rite me ansum: A salute to Cornish dialect. Newbury: Countryside Books.Google Scholar
  36. Montgomery, C. (2007). Northern English dialects: A perceptual approach. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
  37. Moore, E., & Carter, P. (2015). Dialect contact and distinctiveness: The social meaning of language variation in an island community. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19(1), 3–36.Google Scholar
  38. Moore, E., & Podesva, R. (2009). Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society, 38(4), 447–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mumford, J. (2014). Hidden Cornwall: Not beaches and ice-cream but poverty and violence. In The Guardian [online]. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jan/04/hidden-cornwall-beaches-poverty-domestic-violence
  40. Nagy, N. (2011). Lexical change and language contact: Faetar in Italy and Canada. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(3), 366–382.Google Scholar
  41. Orton, H., & Dieth, E. (1962–71). Survey of English dialects. Leeds: E. J. Arnold.Google Scholar
  42. Oxford English Dictionary (OED) Online. Available at http://www.oed.com/
  43. Robinson, J. A. (2012a). A sociolinguistic perspective on semantic change. In K. Allan & J. A. Robinson (Eds.), Current methods in historical semantics (pp. 199–230). Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
  44. Robinson, J. A. (2012b). A gay paper: Why should sociolinguistics bother with semantics? English Today, 28(4), 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23(3), 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stamp, R., Schembri, A., Evans, B., & Cormier, K. (2016). Regional sign language varieties in contact: Investigating patterns of accommodation. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 21(1), 70–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Trudgill, P. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Vernon, J. (1998). Cornwall and the English imagi(nation). In G. Cubitt (Ed.), Imagining nations (pp. 153–172). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wakelin, M. (1984). Cornish English. In P. Trudgill (Ed.), Language in the British Isles (pp. 195–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Watt, D. (2002). ‘I don’t speak with a Geordie accent, I speak, like, the Northern accent’: Contact induced levelling in the Tyneside vowel system. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6(1), 44–63.Google Scholar
  51. Watt, D., & Milroy, L. (1999). Patterns of variation and change in three Newcastle vowels: Is this dialect levelling? In P. Foulkes & G. Docherty (Eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles (pp. 25–46). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  52. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wieling, M., Upton, C., & Thompson, A. (2014). Analyzing the BBC voices data: Contemporary English dialect area and their characteristic lexical variants. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 29(1), 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wigmore, T. (2016). The real Cornwall: A county poorer than Lithuania and Hungary. In New Statesman [online]. Available online: http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/welfare/2016/02/real-cornwall-county-poorer-lithuania-and-hungary
  55. Willett, J. (2009). Why is Cornwall so poor? Narrative, perception and identity. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
  56. Willett, J. (2016). Cornwall’s devolution deal: Towards a more sustainable governance. The Political Quarterly, 87(4), 582–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rhys J. Sandow
    • 1
  • Justyna A. Robinson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations