Advertisement

Conclusion: A Complexity-Informed Approach to the Study of Social-Ecological Systems

  • Eoin Flaherty
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter outlines an integrated conceptual framework, bringing together informants from the preceding chapters in a general theoretical and methodological framework. It proposes that any complete analysis of social-ecological systems must tend as much to abstract questions of the constitution of society, as to the specifics of research methods. This approach is based on several related assumptions, including abandoning divisions between disciplines, and insisting on plurality of method. In this final chapter, we refer to critical realism as a means of bringing the perspectives considered in this book together.

References

  1. Alhadeff-Jones, Michel. 2008. Three Generations of Complexity Theories: Nuance and Ambiguities. In Complexity Theory and the Philosophy of Education, ed. Mark Mason, 62–78. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benton, Ted. 1989. Marxism and Natural Limits: An Ecological Critique and Reconstruction. New Left Review 178: 51–86.Google Scholar
  3. Byrne, David. 1998. Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2002. Interpreting Quantitative Data. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 2005. Complexity, Configurations and Cases. Theory, Culture and Society 22 (1): 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Callinicos, Alex. 2005. Against the New Dialectic. Historical Materialism 13 (2): 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capra, Fritjof. 2005. Complexity and Life. Theory, Culture and Society 22 (1): 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castellani, Brian, and Frederic William Hafferty. 2009. Sociology and Complexity Science: A New Field of Inquiry. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cilliers, Paul. 2001. Boundaries, Hierarchies and Networks in Complex Systems. International Journal of Innovation Management 5 (2): 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daly, Herman E. 1999. Reply to Solow/Stiglitz. In Ecological Economics and the Ecology of Economics, ed. Herman Daly, 85–88. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Dean, Kathryn, Jonathan Joseph, John Michael Roberts, and Colin Wight. 2006. Realism, Marxism and Method. In Realism, Philosophy and Social Science, ed. Kathryn Dean, Jonathan Joseph, John Michael Roberts, and Colin Wight, 1–31. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foster, John Bellamy. 2008a. The Dialectics of Nature and Marxist Ecology. In Dialectics for the New Century, ed. Bertell Ollman and Tony Smith, 50–82. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 2008b. Marx’s Grundrisse and the Ecological Contradictions of Capitalism. In Karl Marx’s Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy 150 Years Later, ed. Marcello Musto, 93–106. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Harvey, David L., and Michael Reed. 2004. Social Science as the Study of Complex Systems. In Chaos Theory in the Social Sciences: Foundations and Applications, ed. L. Douglas Kiel and Euel Elliot, 295–323. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  15. Miller, Jessie L., and James G. Miller. 1992. Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts. Behavioural Science 37 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moore, Jason W. 2017a. Metabolic Rift or Metabolic Shift? Dialectics, Nature, and the World-Historical Method. Theory and Society. Online First. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9290-6.
  17. ———. 2017b. The Capitalocene Part I: On the Nature & Origins of Our Ecological Crisis. Journal of Peasant Studies. Online First. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1235036.
  18. Ragin, Charles. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Roberts, John Michael. 2006. Method, Marxism and Critical Realism. In Realism, Philosophy and Social Science, ed. Kathryn Dean, Jonathan Joseph, John Michael Roberts, and Colin Wight, 65–98. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Uprichard, Emma. 2009. Introducing Cluster Analysis: What Can It Teach Us About the Case? In The Sage Handbook of Case-Based Methods, ed. David Byrne and Charles C. Ragin, 132–147. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Walby, Sylvia. 2007. Complexity Theory, Systems Theory and Multiple Intersecting Inequalities. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (4): 449–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 2008. Historical Materialism in ‘Forms Which Precede Capitalist Production. In Karl Marx’s Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy 150 Years Later, ed. Marcello Musto, 79–92. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eoin Flaherty
    • 1
  1. 1.SociologyUniversity College DublinDublinUK

Personalised recommendations