Advertisement

The Field Hypothesis: Quantum Phenomena and Mind/Matter Interaction

  • Alexandra Walker
Chapter

Abstract

While this book is primarily situated in the disciplines of sociology and social psychology, this chapter introduces the hypothesis of a ‘field’ character of collective consciousness that influences social life and social change. The field hypothesis uses quantum phenomena to connect the human mind with its environment.

Bibliography

  1. Bohm, D. (2002 [1980]). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bohr, N. (1949). Discussions with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, The Library of Living Philosophers (Vol. 7). La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Fuchs, C. A., Mor, T., Rains, E., Shor, P. W., et al. (1999). Quantum Nonlocality without Entanglement. Physical Review, 59(2), 1070–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dhall, A. (2010a). On the Philosophy and Legal Theory of Human Rights in Light of Quantum Holism. World Futures, 66, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47(10), 777–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Holland, G. B. (1998). A Call for Connection: Solutions for Creating a Whole New Culture. Novato, CA: New World Library.Google Scholar
  7. Mansfield, V. (1995). Synchronicity, Science and Soul-Making: Understanding Jungian Synchronicity through Physics, Buddhism and Philosophy. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. McFarlane, T. J. (2000). Quantum Physics, Depth Psychology and Beyond. Retrieved June 18, 2012, from www.integralscience.org
  9. Pattee, H. (1978). The Complementarity Principle in Biological and Social Structures. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 1(2), 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Radin, D. (2006). Entangled Minds: Extrasensory Experiences in Quantum Reality. New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  11. Tribe, L. H. (1989). The Curvature of Constitutional Space: What Lawyers Can Learn from Modern Physics. Harvard Law Review, 83(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wendt, A. (2005). Social Theory as Cartesian Science: An Auto-Critique from a Quantum Perspective. In S. Guzzini & A. Leander (Eds.), Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics (pp. 181–219). Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Wendt, A. (2010). Flatland: Quantum Mind and the International Hologram. Chap. 11 in M Albert, L. Cederman, & A. Wendt (Eds.), New Systems Theories of World Politics. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Wendt, A. (2015). Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wheeler, J., & Zurek, W. (Eds.). (1983). Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra Walker
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Social ImpactUNSW AustraliaSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations