Advertisement

Eco-Reality Television

  • Geoffrey CraigEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication book series (PSMEC)

Abstract

This chapter investigates those reality television programmes where an environmental theme is foregrounded. It initially discusses the main features of reality television: its representational claims and its production of affect and social integration through the public presentation of what are often more private practices and modes of being. The chapter discusses the roles of the programme hosts and the ordinary participants of reality television shows. An analysis of the eco-build episodes of the popular Grand Designs programme demonstrates that such episodes work to normalise and pluralise sustainable building and lifestyles. A case study of the Aotearoa New Zealand reality television programme, WA$TED! reveals how the show highlights and traces the environmental networks that inform and animate everyday practices and objects.

References

  1. Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bonner, Frances. 2003. Ordinary Television: Analyzing Popular TV. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Bratich, Jack. Z. 2007. “Programming Reality: Control Societies, New Subjects and the Powers of Transformation.” In Makeover Television: Realities Remodelled, edited by D. Heller, 6–22. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  4. Brunsdon, Charlotte. 2003. “Lifestyling Britain: The 8–9 Slot on British Television.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 6 (1): 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunsdon, Charlotte, C. Johnson, R. Moseley, and H. Wheatley. 2001. “Factual Entertainment on British Television: The Midlands TV Research Group’s ‘8–9 Project’.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 4 (1): 29–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Couldry, Nick. 2003. Media Rituals: A Critical Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Cruikshank, Barbara. 1999. The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Escoffery, David S., ed. 2006. How Real Is Reality TV? Essays on Representation and Truth. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
  9. Hartley, John. 1992. The Politics of Pictures: The Creation of the Public in the Age of Popular Media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Heller, Dana, ed. 2007. Makeover Television: Realities Remodelled. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  11. Hill, Annette. 2005. Reality TV: Audiences and Popular Factual Television. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Houston, Melinda. 2012. “House Proud.” The Sydney Morning Herald, September 3. https://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/house-proud-20120831-253yg.html.
  13. Kavka, Misha. 2008. Reality Television, Affect and Intimacy: Reality Matters. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Ministry for the Environment. 2007. “Talk Sustainability.” Issue 4. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/sus-dev/talk-sustainability.
  15. Morley, David. 2000. Home Territories: Media, Mobility and Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Morse, Margaret. 1998. Virtualities: Television, Media Art and Cyberculture. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Murdoch, Jonathan. 2006. Post-structuralist Geography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Parkins, Wendy, and Geoffrey Craig. 2011. “Slow Living and the Temporalities of Sustainable Consumption.” In Ethical Consumption: A Critical Introduction, edited by Tania Lewis and Emily Potter, 189–201. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scannell, Paddy. 1996. Radio, Television and Modern Public Life. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Taylor, Lisa. 2002. “From Ways of Life to Lifestyle: The ‘Ordinari-ization’ of British Gardening Lifestyle Television.” European Journal of Communication 17 (4): 479–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wood, Helen, and Beverley Skeggs. 2011. “Reacting to Reality TV: The Affective Economy of an ‘Extended Social/Public Realm’.” In The Politics of Reality Television: Global Perspectives, edited by Marwan M. Kraidy and Katherine Sender, 93–106. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Auckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations