Educational Reform Processes in a Globalized World

  • Laura M. Portnoi


Portnoi establishes the central foundations of public policy, and considers the ideological and political nature of policymaking. Public policies provide governments with the opportunity to publicly declare their priorities, while the absence of a policy indicates lack of commitment to a specific issue. Portnoi outlines theories and models related to the formation of public policies, including the influential policy process model and the four stages of policy borrowing model, which stems from the field of comparative education. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to policymaking are also discussed, as is the role of street-level bureaucrats. Given the influence of global governance organizations, Portnoi considers the question of coercion versus agency in implementing policies, highlighting that both are possible.


  1. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and poststructuralist approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, B. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates, R., Lewis, S., & Pickard, A. (2011). Education policy, practice and the professional. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
  6. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. D. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting change: Vol. 7. Implementing and sustaining innovations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  8. Birkland, T. (2010). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of policy making (3rd ed.). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  9. Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. J. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Educational Policy, 25(4), 547–560.Google Scholar
  10. Brodkin, E. Z. (2003). Street-level research: Policy at the front lines. In T. Corbett & M. C. Lennon (Eds.), Policy into action: Implementation research and welfare reform (pp. 145–164). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brodkin, E. Z. (2011). Putting street-level organizations first: New directions for social policy and management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 1199–1201.Google Scholar
  12. Brodkin, E. Z. (2012). Reflections on street-level bureaucracy: Past, present and future. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 940–949.Google Scholar
  13. Cairney, P. (2011). Understanding public policy: Theories and issues. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
  15. Datnow, A. (2006). Connections in the policy chain: The ‘co-construction’ of implementation in comprehensive school reforms. In New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 105–123). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dempster, M. A. H., & Wildavsky, A. (1979). On change: Or, there is no magic size for an increment. Political Studies, 27, 371–389.Google Scholar
  17. Dye, T. (2012). Understanding public policy (14th ed.). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  18. Dye, T., & Ziegler, H. (2011). The irony of democracy: An uncommon introduction to American politics. Independence, KY: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  19. Dyer, C. (1999). Researching the implementation of educational policy: A backward mapping approach. Comparative Education, 35(1), 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Elmore, R. F. (1979–1980). Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. Political Science Quarterly, 94(4), 601–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fowler, F. C. (2009). Policy studies for educational leaders: An introduction. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  23. Gofen, A. (2014). Mind the gap: Dimensions and influence of street-level divergence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 473–493.Google Scholar
  24. Gordon, I., Lewis, J., & Young, R. (1977). Perspective on policy analysis. Public Administration Bulletin, 25, 26–35.Google Scholar
  25. Harvey, D. (2009). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing public policy: An introduction to the study of operational governance (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Hupe, P., & Buffat, A. (2014). A public service gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16(4), 548–569.Google Scholar
  28. Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85, 279–299.Google Scholar
  29. Keating, J., Preston, R., Burke, P. J., Van Heertum, R., & Arnove, R. F. (2013). The political economy of educational reform in Australia, Britain, and the United States. In R. Arnove, C. A. Torres, & S. Franz (Eds.), Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (4th ed., pp. 247–292). Boston, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  30. Kingdon, J. W. (2010). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.Google Scholar
  31. Kraft, M. E., & Furlong, S. R. (2014). Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives (5th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lasswell, H. D. (1948). Power and personality. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  33. Lasswell, H. D. (1951). The policy orientation. In D. Lerner & H. D. Lasswell (Eds.), The policy sciences (pp. 3–15). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of ‘muddling through’. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.Google Scholar
  35. Lipsky, M. (2010). Street level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation (Original work published 1980).Google Scholar
  36. Malen, B. (2006). Revising policy implementation as a political phenomenon: The case of school reconstitution. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 83–104). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  37. Maynard-Moody, S., & Portillo, S. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy theory. In R. F. Durant (Ed.), Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy (pp. 252–277). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. McLaughlin, M. W. (2006). Implementation research in education: Lessons learned, lingering questions, and new opportunities. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 209–228). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  39. Natesan, S. D., & Marathe, R. R. (2015). Literature review of public policy implementation. International Journal of Public Policy, 11(4/5/6), 219–241.Google Scholar
  40. Ochs, K. (2006). Cross-national policy borrowing and educational innovation: Improving achievement in the London borough of Barking and Dagenham. Oxford Review of Education, 32(5), 599–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ochs, K., & Phillips, D. (2002). Toward a structural typology of cross-national attraction in education. Lisbon, Spain: Educa.Google Scholar
  42. Phillips, D. (2005). Policy borrowing in education: Frameworks for analysis. In J. Zadja (Ed.), International handbook on globalisation, education and policy research (pp. 23–34). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003). Processes of policy borrowing in education: Some explanatory and analytical devices. Comparative Education, 39(4), 451–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rice, D. A. (2013). Street-level bureaucrats and the welfare state: Toward a micro-institutionalist theory of policy implementation. Administration and Society, 45(9), 1038–1062.Google Scholar
  45. Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  48. Smith, S. R. (2012). Street-level bureaucracy and public policy. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (2nd ed., pp. 431–436). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Spring, J. (2015). Globalization of education: An introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Ward, S. C., Bagley, C., Lumby, J., Hamilton, T., Woods, P., & Roberts, A. (2015). What is ‘policy’ and what is ‘policy response’? An illustrative study of the implementation of the Leadership Standards for Social Justice in Scotland. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1–14. doi: 10.1177/1741143214558580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wildavsky, A. (1964). Politics of the budgetary process. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (, which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura M. Portnoi
    • 1
  1. 1.California State UniversityLong BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations